The rising trade in cheetahs to serve as luxury pets in the Middle East is helping to drive critical populations of the wild cats to extinction, new research shows. The report from the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) also reveals the deadly costs of the trade, with up to two-thirds of the cheetah cubs being smuggled across the war-torn Horn of Africa dying en route. However, the nations at both ends of the trade have now agreed that urgent action is needed.
Cheetahs, famous as the world’s fastest land animal, have lost about 90 percent of their population over the past century as their huge ranges in Africa and Asia have been taken over by farmland. Fewer than 10,000 remain, and numbers are falling.
There is an ancient tradition of using trained cheetahs as royal hunting animals in Africa, but more recently, a growing demand for status-symbol pets in the Persian Gulf states has further reduced populations.
Illustration: June Hsu
Cheetahs are unusually easy to tame, especially as cubs, and the report found instances of the big cats riding as car passengers, being walked on leashes and even being exercised on treadmills in Persian Gulf states.
Other evidence showed cheetahs pacing around living rooms and tussling with their owners, including young children.
“This whole trade had not been appreciated by the public or by the conservation world,” said Nick Mitchell, who contributed to the report, the first comprehensive overview of the cheetah trade.
“If we do not act now on the trade and land-use changes, then we can be certainly losing sub-populations in a few years,” he said.
Cheetahs do not breed easily in captivity. The Gulf pet trade is supplied with animals snatched from the wild in the Horn of Africa. The distinct subspecies living there numbers about 2,500. The animals are trafficked by boat from Somalia to Yemen and then by road into the Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia.
“Huge number of cheetahs appear to die in transit,” said Mitchell, who is the eastern African coordinator of the Rangewide Conservation Program for Cheetah and African Wild Dog, a joint project of the Zoological Society of London and the Wildlife Conservation Society.
“For sure, we are talking about very poor people in the Horn of Africa, and they are not too worried about the welfare of the animals,” he said.
The seizures often snare 30 cheetah cubs, with an estimated 50 to 70 percent dying along the way. There is also a demand for cheetah-skin shoes in Sudan, where they are considered to confer high status.
Even more threatened is the cheetah subspecies in Iran, where just 40 to 100 survive that may also be endangered by the pet trade. Another seriously threatened subspecies lives in North and West Africa, numbering fewer than 250. There the main threat is from demand for skins for clothing and for bones and body parts used in traditional medicine and magic rituals.
The largest surviving cheetah population — about 6,200 — is in Southern Africa. Trophy hunting, costing US$10,000 to US$20,000 per animal, is allowed in Namibia, Botswana and Zimbabwe, totaling more than 200 kills per year.
In South Africa, about 90 live captive-bred cheetahs a year are exported to zoos, although conservationists worry that illegal animals could be passed off as these legally traded cheetahs.
The South African government says it is moving towards creating cheetah stud books to enable DNA profiling.
Mitchell said that he was “cautiously optimistic” that a new CITES working group, set up in reponse to the report’s revelations, would curb the illegal trade in cheetahs with better law enforcement.
“The countries were told ‘You cannot ignore it: This is being monitored,’” he said.
David Morgan, head of science at CITES, said: “Middle Eastern countries spoke up very clearly and this has been a positive development. Qatar, the Emirates, Kuwait all recognized the problem.”
Morgan said that the demand for endangered species, including big cats, was showing a trend from “health to wealth,” or a growing emphasis on status symbols over traditional medicines.
“Many Asian countries still want the trade in medicinal products, but the more ‘show-off’ element seems to be rising,” he said. “It comes with the rising economies of these countries and that drives up demand. But there are so very few animals left in the wild that they cannot afford a big rise in demand.”
A recent CITES summit that ended on Friday in Switzerland also acted on the elephant poaching crisis.
“Thailand has been given a last warning,” Morgan said. “They have been put on notice that they have to put their house in order or there will be consequences.”
Unless it acts on its domestic ivory trade, a key part of the ivory chain from Africa to China, Thailand is to be barred from trade in all flora and fauna covered by the international CITES agreement, including the lucrative orchid and cacti trades.
Interpol estimates the illegal wildlife trade to be worth US$10 billion to US$20 billion a year, the fourth most lucrative black market after drugs, people and weapons.
It is already at a scale where it harms people and nations, especially in Africa, with CITES Secretary-General John Scanlon telling the Guardian last year: “It increasingly involves organized crime syndicates and in some cases rebel militia. This poses a serious threat to the stability and economy of affected countries and robs them of their natural resources. They must be stopped.”
“The UN Security Council have linked the Lord’s Resistance Army to ivory smuggling in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, while the al-Shabaab group has been linked to illegal ivory in Somalia,” he said.
Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Wu Qian (吳謙) announced at a news conference that General Miao Hua (苗華) — director of the Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission — has been suspended from his duties pending an investigation of serious disciplinary breaches. Miao’s role within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) affects not only its loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but also ideological control. This reflects the PLA’s complex internal power struggles, as well as its long-existing structural problems. Since its establishment, the PLA has emphasized that “the party commands the gun,” and that the military is
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: