Almost one year after Taiwan signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China, the government continues to insist the nation will have many more opportunities to reach free-trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries, completely ignoring the fact that the main obstacle to such agreements is China.
The state-owned Central News Agency (CNA) reported last month that the Ministry of Economic Affairs planned to step up its ongoing FTA negotiations with Singapore and had high hopes of concluding a deal within one year, but no one knows for sure how long such a deal could take. What we do know is that a South Korea-EU FTA set to take effect on July 1 is likely to have a significant impact on Taiwan’s economy.
This is unavoidable because Taiwan and South Korea compete head-to-head in steel, machinery, electrical equipment, petrochemicals, plastics and textiles. Even worse, about 70 percent to 75 percent of Taiwan’s exports to Europe overlap with those from South Korea.
Once the FTA between South Korea and the EU comes into effect next month, it will remove almost 100 percent of import duties between the two sides and lead to the easing of other non-tariff barriers. As a result, government data show that Taiwanese exports to Europe will be 16 percent to 55 percent more expensive than those of South Korea.
As bad as this is, worse lies ahead for Taiwanese exporters. Their competition with South Korean exporters is set to intensify even further, as South Korea looks to implement an FTA with the US by the end of the year. At the same time, Seoul is also aggressively pursuing a trilateral trade pact with Japan and China.
In contrast, Taiwan’s promotion of an FTA with either the US or the EU has been on hold for years, with no signs of a quick breakthrough anytime soon.
In the event that a trilateral trade deal between South Korea, Japan and China comes into being next year, Taiwan will be further marginalized in the global economy and increasingly less able to compete with South Korea, which has already established FTAs with Australia, Chile, Singapore, India and ASEAN.
Little wonder then that as the one-year anniversary of signing the ECFA approaches some people have come to dismiss the government’s euphoria over its impact on Taiwan’s push for more FTAs as nothing short of delusional.
Last month, in a speech to a local trade group, Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) blamed Taiwan’s lack of progress in signing FTAs on government officials who he said were reticent about opening local markets to competition.
In his assertion, Siew was only partially right. Another important reason why the nation’s FTA push has made so little progress over the past year is cross-strait political tensions.
In view of South Korea’s growing foreign trade power, Taiwanese exporters need to be aware of the possible impact the South Korea-EU FTA could have on their business and devise strategies to respond to this new challenge as soon as possible. In the long term, they will have to differentiate their products and develop niche markets in order to stay competitive.
As for the government, it needs to realize that a deeper and more diversified trade relationship with the world is far more important than a single trade pact with China. In response it should review Taiwan’s current situation in the global trade environment and adjust its FTA strategy accordingly.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS