Ly Mom has been driven out of her lifelong home in Cambodia’s fast-growing capital. Like thousands of other Cambodians forcibly evicted by the authorities, she is homeless, jobless and angry.
Her grocery store on the banks of Phnom Penh’s Boeng Kak Lake is being bulldozed to make way for a luxury housing estate to be built by a Chinese developer and a well-connected Cambodian tycoon.
“People living here have nothing apart from their bare hands,” she said. “They have been given no choice.”
Ly Mom’s story is the flipside of a “no strings” Chinese investment boom that Cambodia’s government says will transform its underdeveloped US$10 billion economy and improve living standards for millions of impoverished people.
A total of 2,752 families have already been driven from their homes around Boeng Kak.
Ly Mom’s family is one of 1,500 refusing to budge, protesting each day and rejecting the developer’s compensation of just US$8,500, or relocation to a small apartment on the fringes of the sprawling city. Their latest demand is for 64m2 of lake land to be left for each family.
But no one is listening to them. Similar protests are held every week in Cambodia as families with no title deeds are told to pack their bags.
Experts warn that Cambodia’s government could one day have a rebellion on its hands.
“The long-range economic costs to a country’s development impact ultimately on the welfare of the people,” said Donald Weatherbee, an expert on Southeast Asian politics at the University of South Carolina.
“The political costs? Well, look at Egypt or Libya,” he said.
The luxury housing project is led by China’s Inner Mongolia Erdos Hongjun Investment Corp, which has pledged to spend US$3 billion in Cambodia on real estate, metal processing and power generation.
China is Cambodia’s biggest source of foreign direct investment (FDI). Beijing plans to spend US$8 billion in 360 projects in the first seven months of this year — the same amount it invested in the whole of Southeast Asia in 2008.
China is also Cambodia’s -largest source of foreign aid, providing about US$600 million in 2007 and US$260 million in 2008.
However, as Chinese, Vietnamese, South Korean and local businesses snap up lucrative concessions and real estate, farmers are being evicted and entire villages shifted to make way for mining, agriculture and hydropower projects.
Rights groups and donor countries are concerned and have threatened to withhold much-needed aid to one of Asia’s poorest countries, home to 14 million people and sandwiched between larger neighbors Thailand and Vietnam.
The evictions have risen as Beijing cozies up to its cash-strapped and underdeveloped ally and strengthens a relationship that analysts say has the US concerned about China’s expanding influence in Southeast Asia.
According to Housing Rights Task Force, a Cambodian group monitoring forced evictions, 30,000 people were moved off their land last year, up from 27,000 in 2009. An estimated 150,000 more evictions are expected in the next few years, 70,000 to 80,000 in Phnom Penh alone.
World Bank president Robert Zoellick recently said he was “deeply troubled” by the Boeng Kak evictions and offered financing and expert advice to the government.
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has not responded. In several speeches he has expressed a clear preference for Chinese investment, because it comes without conditions, unlike Western nations that relentlessly prod his government to carry out democratic reforms and improve its dismal record on human rights and corruption.
“China’s investments have few strings attached,” Cambodian political analyst Chea Vannath said. “China’s push for more power and influence works very well with Cambodia, because it needs a cash injection into its economy and infrastructure.”
Most Cambodians who have been forcibly evicted are unable to prove ownership of land and property because legal documents were destroyed during the Khmer Rouge’s brutal 1970s “Year Zero” revolution that killed about 1.7 million people.
Weatherbee said the evictions could one day lead to a groundswell of public discontent over what he calls “crony capitalism” between Cambodian elites and Chinese firms.
“For the people, the short term economic gains seem offset by the disruptions of human displacement, environmental disaster and political oppression,” he said.
Growth and development seems to be Cambodia’s priority. Trade with China climbed 42.1 percent last year to US$1.12 billion. During Hun Sen’s visit last year to Beijing, China promised a US$300 million loan to build two national roads and an irrigation project. Other deals worth about US$293 million, mostly infrastructure-related, were also agreed.
Chinese has so far invested just more than US$1 billion in Cambodia — a figure dwarfed by huge investment pledges over the next five years. Total Chinese FDI in other Southeast Asian economies, up to the end of 2009, included US$799 million in Indonesia, US$448 million in Thailand and US$728 million in Vietnam, official Chinese figures showed.
Analysts say the arrangement with Cambodia has been designed to go beyond business. China will be assured of Cambodia’s political support, while Beijing’s veto as a permanent member of the UN Security Council could offer Cambodia some international protection, as it has the military generals that run Myanmar, who are also key allies of China.
Cambodia showed its unwavering support for China in December 2009 by defying international pressure and deporting 20 Muslim Uighurs who sought asylum after fleeing ethnic violence in China. Two days later, Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) visited Phnom Penh and signed 14 trade deals worth US$850 million.
Following a recent visit to Beijing, Cambodian Foreign Minister Hor Namhong made his country’s stance clear.
“It’s a good thing that China, as the rising superpower, contributes to solve the world’s problems,” he said.
“Should we rather accept Chinese tourists who spend money in our country, or Chinese refugees?” he said.
Similar patterns of Chinese investment are being seen in Myanmar and Communist Laos as Beijing splashes its cash and boosts its presence in Southeast Asia.
China is planning to pour money into rail and road projects to increase trade, investment and tourism in the region, underscoring strengthening ties with the 10-member ASEAN, with which it has agreed a free-trade pact covering an area with a combined population of 1.9 billion people and GDP of nearly US$6 trillion.
For people like Ly Mom, China’s interest in Cambodia has left a sour taste and protests are increasingly common.
Strict laws were passed in 2009 to restrict demonstrations, which rights groups and experts saw as a pre-emptive strike by Hun Sen’s government, aware it could have problems on its hands.
Housing Rights Task Force director Sia Phearum, said that if the rights of ordinary Cambodians were ignored, the result would be instability and eventual upheaval.
“The future is that there will be more serious human rights violations, and unrest like in the Arab countries,” Sia Phearum said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY BEN BLANCHARD
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS