The recent execution of five death row inmates not only brought the topic of Taiwan’s abolishing the death penalty back into public focus, but also led the German government’s commissioner for human rights policy to immediately condemn the decision and demand that Taiwan’s representative to Germany explain the matter to Germany’s Foreign Office. Shortly after this, the EU’s High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy also issued a strong protest.
The German reaction could easily have been anticipated. In 2005, Washington Post journalist Charles Lane discovered that every time a US state executed a death row inmate, the German media would rise as one to attack the US, although the German government did not dare reprimand the US ambassador to Germany. After researching the issue to get to the bottom of the drafting of Article 102 of Germany’s Grundgesetz (Basic Law), which abolishes the death penalty, Lane wrote a piece called “The Paradoxes of a Death Penalty Stance.”
Many Germans feel that Article 102, which simply reads, “The death penalty is abolished,” gives them the moral high ground, and they think of other nations as being barbaric for not following in their footsteps. If you ask a German about the source of Article 102, the answer would be that they were motivated by disgust at the Nazis’ brutal killings during World War II and so decided to abolish the death penalty to uphold human rights and dignity. However, Lane discovered another reason.
After World War II had just ended, nearly 80 percent of Germans supported the death sentence. Therefore, the Social Democrats, who had promoted abolishing the death sentence, did not dare go against public opinion. Other political parties were the same. However, a miracle occurred and a delegate, Hans-Christoph Seebohm, from a small party on the far right surprisingly proposed abolishing the death sentence. What where his motives for doing so?
At that time, the occupying forces had already held several trials in Nuremberg and major war criminals had been executed while many secondary war criminals had been sentenced to death, but had not yet been executed. Seebohm had very close ties to the Nazis and to save others from execution, he came up with the plan to abolish the death penalty. Unexpectedly, not only did the Social Democrats agree, but the larger Christian Democratic Union also supported the idea, as many of its members were also Nazi sympathizers, and Article 102 was passed.
In his piece, Lane says that those who wrote the article did not care about the fate of ordinary killers and that if it wasn’t for those Nazi leaders, Germany would never have drawn up Article 102.
Germany has been a major player in promoting the abolition of the death sentence. Before World War II, smaller countries like Switzerland and the Netherlands abolished the death sentence, but such a move did not catch on. After Germany’s economy regained its strength and as it gained more of a say in Western European affairs, the Germans used this as an opportunity to promote the values of their Basic Law and worked assiduously at pushing through the European Convention on Human Rights demanding that all member states abolish the death sentence.
With the exception of Belarus, all European countries have now done this, so Germany can claim a lot of the credit for pushing for the abolition of the death sentence. However, we must know that their abolition of the death sentence was a product of chance. Article 102 was drawn up against public opinion and, in comparison, the way Taiwan is acting is more in line with the practices of a democratic nation.
Huang Juei-min is a law professor at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS