Taiwan can improve in 2010
As it is time for New Year’s resolutions, I want to propose two ideas that could help Taiwan become a more responsible society and gain more respect in the international community. These suggestions can easily be put into effect by the government and have the added advantage that there is no need for China’s approval.
Specifically, Taiwan should stop wasting resources and abolish the death penalty.
Like many foreigners living in Taiwan, I am impressed by the degree to which Taiwanese have gotten used to separating their garbage, rivaling even German standards. At the same time, however, tonnes and tonnes of precious natural resources are wasted every day in the form of plastic bags, plastic cups and throwaway chopsticks.
There simply is no reason for every piece of fruit or bread to be put into separate plastic bags. It is also appalling to see coffee shops handing out plastic cups to customers who drink inside the restaurant. Not only do bags and cups often end up being discarded on the street or in parks (aided by the inexplicable fact that public waste bins are few and far between), this also fosters a throwaway mentality that effectively prevents a sense of responsibility for the environment.
The government could easily change this by making customers pay a compulsory fee of, say, NT$2 for every plastic bag handed out to them, and not just for those stores currently required to charge fees. Also, customers should tell shopkeepers to act more responsibly. Such improvements on the environmental front would also lead to positive press coverage internationally.
Knowing the Western media from the inside, I can further assure Taiwanese that there is no single decision that would generate such an international wave of goodwill for Taiwan as the abolition of the death penalty.
It has been widely argued, including in the Taipei Times, that executions do not prevent crime. More than three years ago, Taiwan’s government wisely decided to put a moratorium on capital punishment. Now the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should use its control of both the government and the legislature to finally get rid of it altogether. By this simple act, Taiwan would make it unmistakably clear to the world that, unlike China, it is a country in which human rights are respected and the government does not need to threaten to kill its own citizens. Media worldwide will gladly report this story.
More often than not, New Year’s resolutions are quickly forgotten. However, Taiwanese should not allow these two to fade away. They will not make Chinese missiles go away, they will not guarantee a seat in any international organization or bring back lost jobs, but they would make Taiwan an even better country.
Klaus Bardenhagen
Taipei
Thumbs down for ‘Taiwan Up’
I’d just like to say that the slogan “Taiwan Up,” in massive illuminated letters on Taipei 101 on New Year’s Eve, was total rubbish, and “up” there for all the world to see.
Which bright spark came up with that? And which (city government) dimwits didn’t point out that it doesn’t actually make much sense in English? Maybe “Up Taiwan” was really what they meant (as in “Up yours”), otherwise why not go to the trouble to come up with a slogan that makes sense in English?
To be serious, while not an exact translation of the Chinese, “Viva Taiwan” would have been better (universally understood and also expressing the hope that things go well/get better), or even just “Go Taiwan!”
Things like this and the English mistakes in the Duty Free shops in Terminal 2 at Taoyuan Airport (which I saw when I was back in Taiwan last month) and in other materials meant to promote Taiwan are well meaning, but badly conceived and shoddily carried out (and easily avoided, simply by asking a reasonably competent native English speaker/translator to check them) and do Taiwan’s international image no favors at all.
It is worth noting that the examples I mention would not happen in Hong Kong.
Kevin Lax
Shanghai
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
RSS