While the timing and details of the Cabinet reshuffle came as a surprise, the axing of premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) is not inexplicable. The composition of the new Cabinet, with some ministers replaced and others staying on, shows that the reshuffle is aimed at maintaining the government’s pro-China policies and improving the prospects of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in local elections in December.
The features of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) third-rate government that gave rise to public resentment remain unchanged. Given Ma’s refusal to admit to any fault on his part, all we can do is pray that Heaven will protect Taiwan until the next presidential election in 2012.
Typhoon Morakot and the ensuing floods led to the premier’s resignation, but other factors contributed to growing unease with the government.
Ma’s administration has belittled Taiwan’s sovereignty, drained the nation’s assets and politicized the judiciary, backtracking on democratic gains won over the years. But it is the government’s persistent arrogance and lack of common sense in the face of death and destruction during and after the typhoon that has revealed its reckless and uncaring attitude. Public opinion has turned sharply against the government, putting it on the defensive. It was therefore right that Liu stepped down.
The National Security Council (NSC) was widely criticized for turning down offers of aid from abroad following the typhoon, but it refuses to acknowledge its mistake or recognize the national security implications of the disaster. By turning down aid when it was offered, the NSC damaged Washington’s confidence in Taipei just as trust between Taiwan and Japan is at its lowest point since the countries broke off diplomatic relations in 1972. All this is a consequence of giving cross-strait relations priority over other ties based on the idea that Taiwan is part of China.
NSC Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起) remains in his post, as does Mainland Affairs Council (陸委會) Minister Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛), indicating that the government intends to maintain its pro-China stance and work toward an economic cooperation framework agreement with China, which will further harm Taiwan’s interests and diminish its sovereignty.
New Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and Vice Premier Eric Chu (朱立倫) were tasked with forming a Cabinet, but there has been no change in the leadership of some ministries directly responsible for handling the typhoon, including the Public Construction Commission, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications and the Council of Agriculture. Minister of Finance Lee Sush-der (李述德), who has been running up public debt, also remains in his post.
The reshuffle is not aimed at dealing with problems thrown up by Morakot, and economic policies driving the economy deeper into the red will continue. All Ma has done is put two political stars with local administrative experience at the head of the Cabinet to present a fresh facade and salvage the KMT’s dented prospects for December’s elections.
The new Cabinet will thus continue leaning toward China, gutting the nation’s finances and using the police and courts to hunt down political opponents. Public resentment following the typhoon has led to a desire for change, but Ma’s appointments show that he is not interested.
His attitude contrasts sharply with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, who appointed one of his harshest critics, Han Seung-soo, as prime minister, and Japanese prime minister-elect Yukio Hatoyama, who has set himself the task of freeing the country from the hold of bureaucrats. Lee and Hatoyama chose Cabinet members with the public interest in mind, but Taiwan’s government is concerned only with winning elections.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s