In his article “Good education, made in Taiwan” (July 9, page 8), Bill Costello suggests ways that the US could learn from Taiwan’s educational system. Costello raised some excellent points, but I would caution against the suggestion that Taiwan serve as a model for education in the US.
Costello notes that Taiwanese students do well in math and science, but what about other crucial subjects?
Taiwanese students do well where rote learning is involved, but their independent thought and critical thinking skills leave much to be desired.
Ask a child to add numbers or repeat information and you’ll be amazed at their performance. But ask that same child to form an opinion or draw a conclusion about something and you’re likely to be met with a blank stare.
Students are taught to regurgitate information and are not encouraged to ask questions or apply logic to deduce things for themselves. Tests do not challenge their capacity for creative thinking, but rather check what they have memorized.
Costello suggests the US serve more nutritious lunches, keep students more active and use hands-on interdisciplinary learning. These are all great suggestions, but he also says the US should adopt the practice in Taiwan of requiring public school students to wear uniforms.
Making students don uniforms fits in with the simple input-output instruction employed at Taiwanese schools. Although Costello doesn’t mention it, each student is assigned a number. Students don’t have their names stitched onto their uniforms but their numbers.
This has the effect of discouraging individuality and independent thought. If this is our goal, school uniforms are a superb idea. But if that’s not what we’re shooting for, it is difficult to imagine what benefit uniforms could possibly bring.
Costello writes: “Studies show that school uniforms raise academic performance, while lowering violence, theft and the negative effects of peer pressure.”
I’m skeptical of this claim. What studies is he referring to and what methodology did they employ? How did they eliminate the countless variables that affect academic performance?
The suggestion that putting your son or daughter in a uniform increases his or her chances of performing well at school is ridiculous.
Likewise, we should not think students’ misbehavior is the result of allowing them to choose their own attire.
As for peer pressure, this is part and parcel of the experience of growing and learning, and prepares children for the “real world.”
Costello suggests Taiwanese students are taught more personal responsibility than their US counterparts, citing as evidence the daily cleaning ritual at schools. The question is whether they practice “personal responsibility” outside that ritual.
Students in my new classes have tended to be so messy that I had to clean up the classroom after every lesson. But my students were not incurable. I instilled a sense of responsibility in them not through a cleaning “ritual,” but by asking mess students questions such as how they would feel if the student who used their desk before them had left used tissues in it.
I explained the importance of respecting our shared space and each other. I discussed how our actions affect others, challenged students to think of examples and demonstrated the practicality of applying the golden rule in their daily lives.
When you speak to children as equals, allow them to express themselves, foster their curiosity, promote critical thinking and seek their opinions, the results are truly rewarding.
The effects of doing the opposite are less than desirable.
I agree with Costello that US schools need improvement and Taiwanese schools perform better in some respects. However, Taiwan’s educational system is in dire need of attention before we start touting it as a model for others.
Jeremy R. Hammond has taught English as a second language in Taiwan for seven years.
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS