Last week, Ang Lee's (
The reason? Too many key members of the production were not Taiwanese, which raises the interesting question of how films are defined by their "nationality."
It seems increasingly difficult today to define or determine "nationality," not just for people but also for cultural and commercial products.
Over the decades, the global film industry has mixed and matched talent, expertise, capital and artistic and commercial inspiration from around the world, a trend that is arguably accelerating, as suggested by Hollywood remakes of a series of Asian blockbusters such as The Killer, Ringu, The Grudge and Infernal Affairs. Such borrowing across the East-West line is not unprecedented: The Magnificent Seven was a successful 1960 remake of Akira Kurosawa's The Seven Samurai, for example.
Filmmakers in Asia have conversely borrowed talent and techniques from the West to enhance their filmmaking.
International participation and cooperation is here to stay. These are two of the most important factors in maintaining the quality of films, including in Hollywood, and replenishing pools of talent.
So, disqualifying a film from an award ceremony based on a percentage of less senior foreign crew members seems a little outdated -- if not indefensible. Intriguingly, the rules do not say what the percentages are.
Rule Fourteen for next year's Academy Awards states simply that: "The submitting country must certify that creative talent of that country exercised artistic control of the film," and that "The Academy will make the final determination in all questions of eligibility."
By refusing Lust, Caution a Taiwanese berth, the Academy is claiming that the Taiwanese director, writer and other Taiwanese members of the production crew -- and some of the film's financial backers -- did not exercise "artistic control" over the film. This might have been a more credible statement if the Academy had determined who did exercise this control and to which country these alleged people belonged.
But they did not, creating a situation in which any number of foreign films are ineligible for the Oscars because they are excessively multicultural and insufficiently "national."
Because there are no rules on this matter, we are left with the possibility of political or other interference with the nomination process, a problem that is by no means unique to this part of the Academy's duties.
Still, the fuss over this matter is of little import. Lee has enough Oscars to prove to people who take the Academy Awards seriously that he is a top filmmaker. And there is every likelihood that the film might not have survived the cut to the final five nominees, given that the US release of Lust, Caution has met with a substantial number of poor reviews.
If the Taiwanese government is going to take anything away from this minor fracas, it is this: There are Taiwanese filmmakers to back for an Oscar gong other than Ang Lee, a director of vision and brilliance who needs no further recognition.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s