US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte has criticized moves toward holding a referendum on applying for UN membership under the name Taiwan. This is an important warning regarding the relations between Taiwan and the US, and we should pay close attention to what follows.
Negroponte's statements bring to mind former secretary of state Colin Powell's interview with Hong Kong's Phoenix Television in October 2004. Powell said at the time: "There is only one China. Taiwan is not independent. It does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation."
Recently, with statements like Negroponte's that a referendum is "a step towards the declaration ... of independence of Taiwan," or by Dennis Wilder, the senior director of East Asian Affairs on the US' National Security Council, that: "Taiwan, or the Republic of China, is not at this point a state," Washington has virtually become a mouthpiece for the Chinese government. It is increasingly obvious that China uses the US government to put pressure on Taiwan.
The problem is that the US is willing to oppress Taiwanese democracy rather than muster up the will or the courage to take a stand against China's arbitrary and unreasonable demands. And when the US chooses the side of China, relations between Taiwan and the US cannot avoid structural change.
For a long time, Taiwan was different from other Asian countries in that it had no strong national anti-US feeling or movement.
It is therefore worth examining how the US government's position brushes aside the manifestation of the will of the Taiwanese public and harms relations between Taiwan and the US.
With the US and China standing together in preventing Taiwan from breaking out of its diplomatic isolation, feelings of dislike and distrust are growing among Taiwanese. Some polls in Taiwan illustrate this development. The favorable impression the Taiwanese have of the US is steadily weakening, and anti-US sentiment is brewing.
In the interview with Phoenix Television, Negroponte said that "Taiwan has no better friend than the United States." But Washington often disregards the fact that for a long time, Taiwan has been the US' most reliable friend. It seems to take Taiwan's support and cooperation for granted, while disregarding what Taiwan stands for and what it wants. US opposition to Taiwan holding a referendum on UN membership reflects this arrogant attitude.
The biggest blind spot the US has regarding Taiwan is that it doesn't know how to deal with its democracy and its people.
It still believes that by putting pressure on Taiwan's leaders it can change policy. This is exactly the mistake that the US most often warns the leaders in Beijing against.
When Washington criticizes Taipei and says that pushing for a referendum is a mistake, it not only criticizes President Chen Shui-bian (
Rhetoric that seeks to separate Chen from the public only serves to show how little the US, one of the world's foremost democracies, understands democracy.
Arrogance and lack of understanding on the part of the US only makes Taiwanese feel angry and frustrated.
When anti-US sentiment emerges in Taiwan, it could gradually evolve into anti-Americanism, and this in turn could influence Taiwan's strategic choices.
This might be the most important factor in structural changes in the relationship between Taiwan and the US.
Lo Chih-cheng is an assistant professor of political science at Soochow University and the secretary-general of the Taiwan Society.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS