US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte has criticized moves toward holding a referendum on applying for UN membership under the name Taiwan. This is an important warning regarding the relations between Taiwan and the US, and we should pay close attention to what follows.
Negroponte's statements bring to mind former secretary of state Colin Powell's interview with Hong Kong's Phoenix Television in October 2004. Powell said at the time: "There is only one China. Taiwan is not independent. It does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation."
Recently, with statements like Negroponte's that a referendum is "a step towards the declaration ... of independence of Taiwan," or by Dennis Wilder, the senior director of East Asian Affairs on the US' National Security Council, that: "Taiwan, or the Republic of China, is not at this point a state," Washington has virtually become a mouthpiece for the Chinese government. It is increasingly obvious that China uses the US government to put pressure on Taiwan.
The problem is that the US is willing to oppress Taiwanese democracy rather than muster up the will or the courage to take a stand against China's arbitrary and unreasonable demands. And when the US chooses the side of China, relations between Taiwan and the US cannot avoid structural change.
For a long time, Taiwan was different from other Asian countries in that it had no strong national anti-US feeling or movement.
It is therefore worth examining how the US government's position brushes aside the manifestation of the will of the Taiwanese public and harms relations between Taiwan and the US.
With the US and China standing together in preventing Taiwan from breaking out of its diplomatic isolation, feelings of dislike and distrust are growing among Taiwanese. Some polls in Taiwan illustrate this development. The favorable impression the Taiwanese have of the US is steadily weakening, and anti-US sentiment is brewing.
In the interview with Phoenix Television, Negroponte said that "Taiwan has no better friend than the United States." But Washington often disregards the fact that for a long time, Taiwan has been the US' most reliable friend. It seems to take Taiwan's support and cooperation for granted, while disregarding what Taiwan stands for and what it wants. US opposition to Taiwan holding a referendum on UN membership reflects this arrogant attitude.
The biggest blind spot the US has regarding Taiwan is that it doesn't know how to deal with its democracy and its people.
It still believes that by putting pressure on Taiwan's leaders it can change policy. This is exactly the mistake that the US most often warns the leaders in Beijing against.
When Washington criticizes Taipei and says that pushing for a referendum is a mistake, it not only criticizes President Chen Shui-bian (
Rhetoric that seeks to separate Chen from the public only serves to show how little the US, one of the world's foremost democracies, understands democracy.
Arrogance and lack of understanding on the part of the US only makes Taiwanese feel angry and frustrated.
When anti-US sentiment emerges in Taiwan, it could gradually evolve into anti-Americanism, and this in turn could influence Taiwan's strategic choices.
This might be the most important factor in structural changes in the relationship between Taiwan and the US.
Lo Chih-cheng is an assistant professor of political science at Soochow University and the secretary-general of the Taiwan Society.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS