How fitting that former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Fitting, because anyone who still believes a word uttered by this wholly discredited figure after last year's events is a complete and utter fool.
Foolish to believe the word of a man who broke so many of the promises he made last time around.
A man that vowed to endure pain, hardship and suffering to stay outside the Presidential Office until Chen stepped down, but who after just a few hours of protesting was whisked off in a chauffeur-driven car for a meal at a fancy restaurant and a shower at a luxury hotel.
A man who on Dec. 5 began a self-imposed exile in his apartment -- again vowing to stay there until Chen stepped down -- but just a few weeks later made a trip to the US.
A man who has never properly explained the source of, or what happened to, the NT$110 million (US$3.3 million) he received in donations ahead of the original campaign.
A man who claimed to be fighting for a better society, but who took to the stage with known gangsters, convicted tax evaders and various other criminal figures.
And a man whose sole campaign premise was based on "fighting corruption," but who showed an incredibly selective attitude when it came to choosing the type of corruption he wanted to fight.
Only complete fools would believe Shih and the reasons he gave on Sunday for the decision to resuscitate his failed campaign; namely that he was worried that Chen would break his promise and refuse to step down if first lady Wu Shu-jen (
Let's hope Shih doesn't manage to fool Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
Indeed, it was Ma who ended up looking like a fool when Taipei residents eventually became so fed up with the disruption caused by Shih's ridiculous movement that the mayor's popularity began to slide.
But while Shih is willing to take everyone else for fools, he himself is not a complete fool. When he spoke on Sunday about creating a "third force" in Taiwanese politics, he made it clear that he would not run in the year-end legislative elections. This is not surprising following his disastrous performance in 2002, when he stood for Kaohsiung mayor and received just 8,750 votes.
It will be interesting to see this time around -- in an election year -- if any pan-blue politicians are foolish enough to pin their stripes on Shih's "anti-corruption" post, especially after People First Party Chairman James Soong (
But the biggest fools of all will be anybody who believes Shih's revived campaign is anything but a partisan attempt to harm the pan-green camp's chances in the upcoming legislative and presidential elections. Why else would Shih rail against an incriminated president, but say nothing about the possibility of an indicted man succeeding him?
No doubt a minority of pan-blue diehards, Chen-haters and the free lunch crowd will be foolish enough to join forces with Shih once more.
But surely no one else is willing to be fooled again?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS