On behalf of Cisco Systems, I would like to point out a number of serious factual errors in the article "Beware Cisco's example in China, author warns," (Sept. 1, page 10).
As one of the world's leaders in Internet networking technology, Cisco Systems has played an important role in the growth of the Internet globally and in China.
Ethan Gutmann's claim that Cisco has somehow built a national security database in China for the Chinese Public Security Bureau is factually wrong. Cisco Systems makes networking software and hardware -- we do not build database software.
Gutmann's false allegations are based on his attendance at a public trade show held in Shanghai in 2002. We note that, at that time, Gutmann did not identify himself as a journalist or author, and that he has never called Cisco to seek any information or explanation on Cisco's products or services for his various magazine articles or forthcoming book.
Apparently, he does not consider it important to check his facts before airing such spurious accusations as he promotes his books.
We believe that these claims stem from a fundamental misunderstanding about what networking products do and what they are capable of: The networking hardware and software products that Cisco sells in China are exactly the same as those we sell in every market in the world. And it is our users, not Cisco, that determine the applications that they deploy.
Gutmann claims that Cisco is in violation of the US Foreign Relations Authorization Act. This is not true. The act in question requires export licensing from the US Department of Commerce for specifically designed policing equipment like shotguns, police helmets and handcuffs. Networking products from Cisco and our competitors are not covered by this legislation.
Cisco does sell networking equipment to law enforcement agencies around the world, including China, in compliance with US Department of Commerce regulations. Our products offer benefits through the networking of computing devices that aid in the effectiveness and timeliness of law enforcement.
We also sell our products to many public sector organizations like universities, municipal governments, utilities, etc.
Cisco Systems does not participate in the censorship of information by governments. Moreover, Cisco complies with US government regulations, which prohibit the sale of our products to certain destinations, or to users who misuse our products or resell them to prohibited users.
Terry Alberstein
Cisco Systems, Asia Pacific
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS