On Feb. 25, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) made a very important policy announcement when he received Richard Bush, director of the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution and former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT). Chen publicly called on Taiwan, Japan and South Korea to actively respond to the US-initiated "theater missile defense" (TMD) system.
Commenting on North Korea's abrupt missile test right before the inauguration of South Korea President Roh Moo-hyun, Chen said the test highlighted the seriousness and significance of a TMD system. "North Korea fired a missile into the Sea of Japan. China has also deployed hundreds of ballistic missiles along its southeast coast. We should therefore face the problem seriously. Taiwan, Japan and South Korea must all respond to this actively and effectively," Chen said.
The South Korean government has decided not to build a TMD system due to its worries about irritating North Korea and other concerns. Japan and the US have studied a joint deployment of a TMD system for many years. North Korea's secret development of nuclear weapons, especially this latest missile test, will hasten the Japan-US TMD deployment.
When I visited Tokyo last month, some senior Japanese lawmakers told me that this was a pressing matter, and that the Japanese government should take national security as a priority, and it should not hesitate any longer due to its worries about irritating Beijing.
Former minister of national defense Chiang Chung-ling (蔣仲苓) used to portray a TMD system as a "money pit." Many in military circles also objected to the system due to its expense,which may crowd out the budget for other weapon systems. As a result, the government has adopted an ambiguous attitude toward the system over the past few years. Chen's statement clarified the government's stance. It's a clear policy announcement that deserves people's attention and full support.
China has deployed over 400 ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan. According to the latest US intelligence information, the People's Liberation Army has hastened its missile deployment by adding an average of between 75 and 100 missiles per year. The total num-ber of missiles will exceed 650 by the year 2005.
Once Beijing decides to attack Taiwan, it will launch intensive missile attacks to destroy the nation's command, control, communication, computer, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) mechanisms. It will also damage major economic infrastructure, such as airports, ports, power plants and oil refineries. The government must urgently strengthen the nation's anti-missile forces in light of its limited missile-defense ability.
Mary Tighe, director of the Asian and Pacific affairs of the US Office of the Secretary of Defense, is scheduled to visit Taipei this month. She will have talks with the military on missile-defense issues. Such a visit has a significant meaning. Beijing has always objected to Taiwan-US missile defense cooperation. Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
Washington's insistence on strengthening its missile defense cooperation with Taipei is indeed rare and precious. In fact, when I visited Washington last month, I heard that some US officials dis-agreed with sending a top defense official to Taipei to discuss missile-defense issues. But the government stood by its decision.
Although Washington needs Beijing's support on the Iraq and North Korea crises, US officials repeatedly told Taiwanese legislators that the US will not gain Beijing's support at the cost of sacrificing Taiwan's safety and interest. Given Tighe's upcoming visit, we can tell that the US does value the improvement in Tai-wan's defense ability.
A massive amount of resources is needed for a TMD system-whether it's a "Theater Missile Defense"(戰區飛彈防禦) or a "Taiwan Missile Defense"(台灣飛彈防禦)system. The military should clearly explain to both the legislature and the public the significance and urgency of a TMD system in order to win support for the government's defense policy.
Strictly speaking, a TMD system is not just an anti-missile system. It has four major elements: First, it can strengthen Taiwan's early-warning system and C4ISR functions. The range of the early-warning radar system is limited, which restricts the scope and time to intercept China's missiles to about 90 seconds. After a long-range early-warning radar system is deployed, officials will be aware of a missile attack earlier and will have five more minutes to prepare.
Second, it can strengthen the nation's passive defense ability. Some US defense experts have repeatedly urged Taiwan to protect its C4ISR mechanisms by building underground or bomb-resistant facilities, and dispersing its command posts. This will reduce first-strike damage and will help the command, control and communication systems to survive.
Third, it can strengthen Tai-wan's active defense ability. For example, if the nation can deploy the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) missiles in the next few years, they will expand searching and firing ranges several times those of the PAC-2 missiles, extending preparation time for war. The PAC-3 missiles are "hit-to-kill" missiles that can directly intercept and destroy any missile warheads.
Fourth, it can help Taiwan to develop a deterrent and offensive weapons.
Over the past six months, US defense officials have repeatedly told Taiwanese legislators who visited Washington that it's impossible for Taipei to guard itself against Beijing's missiles in light of the large number of missiles. Offense is the best defense. Hence, the nation must build offensive weapons that are capable of destroying China's missile bases, command, control, radar and other systems in an effort to deter Beijing's ambitions.
It should not be willing to bear China's first strike without hitting back due to its fears about irritating Beijing. A complete TMD system should include countermeasures and offensive forces that strengthen our deterrent and defensive capabilities. In terms of what kinds of offensive weapons should be developed, the legislature and society can have a rational debate in order to form a consensus.
Parris Chang is a DPP legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS