Apart from countries in the developing world, there are very few nations in which government ministries behave as they do in Taiwan as far as the "colonization" of information by multinational corporations is concerned. That is to say the way in which they completely abandon their powers of reasoning and become appendages of the multinationals and accomplices to their monopolization of markets.
Taiwan's IT hardware industry has been highly successful, yet we still have to rely on operating systems and office management software provided by foreign software companies.
The media have reported that, before the Ministry of Justice began its large-scale crackdown on pirated software, it wasted public funds by purchasing so-called "legal" software from these foreign software companies, apparently considering that it was perfectly in order for it to do so. I worry that once organizations are forced by anti-piracy activities to install legal software, Taiwan will not only lose tens of billions of dollars as feared by some legislators, but, more seriously, it will also have to give up its "sovereignty of information" and maybe even its national security.
Taiwan's IT strategy has all along been tantamount to "Microsoftization." So-called IT education is constantly providing training and marketing at no cost to Microsoft, and the nervous atmosphere created by anti-piracy activities provides an excellent opportunity for the all-out "Microsoftization" of Taiwan. This is a structural problem. Government ministries, IT educators, the media and private organizations, have all, through no fault of their own, fallen into a maelstrom of complex and egregious consequences of the globalization of information and the detailed manipulation of information rights.
Basically, a computer operating system is not only the gateway to information. It is the fundamental platform of information. If we cannot grasp the technologies to utilize that platform and instead entrust our "sovereignty of information" and our national security to a closed company that does not publish the source codes of its software and monopolizes markets, then we simply allow that company to colonize our IT efforts. This is the greatest danger to the development of the information society in Taiwan.
China, whose information industry is less developed than Taiwan's, realized just how frightening this colonization really is a few years back, and has since then been developing its own operating system with the backing of the Chinese government. What's more, the "Chinese 2000" operating system developed by Zhu Bangfu (
Here in Taiwan, there are many talented information professionals quietly protecting the spirit embodied by free software and working hard to create a Chinese user environment.
My point is that Microsoft is far from our only choice. Rather than allocating large funds to purchase foreign software, why doesn't the government invest in the research and development of a few pieces of free software, further developing our own operating systems and office management software? More importantly, such software should not be freeware, but it should be far less expensive than Microsoft's products. In view of the need to cut down on government expenditure and protect national security, I can see no reason why the government should reject such a strategy.
On the pretext of developing an information society, the government has already allowed Taiwan to become substantially "colonized" by Microsoft. Look at all the government Web sites. Whether they consist of statistical research or government reports, they all use proprietary Microsoft formats. The documents available at the sites are very slow to open, and the viewer has to have software capable of reading the Word format installed on his or her computer. Thus the government has taken the lead in the "Microsoftization" of Taiwan, and silently helps Microsoft products become the industrial standard.
While striving to protect intellectual property rights, the government must work toward a legalization in this field that exists in form and in substance, and reflects the true nature of Taiwan's IT industry. The nation's IT strategy must absolutely not amount to "Microsoftization."
Lin Chien-chen is a research assistant at the Social Welfare Research Institute, National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In September 2015, Russia intervened militarily in Syria’s civil war, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorship as it teetered on the brink of collapse. This was the high point of Russia’s resurgence on the world stage and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ability to tilt the war in al-Assad’s favor helped make him a regional power broker. In addition to enhancing Putin’s stature, the operation led to strategic gains that gave Russia leverage vis-a-vis regional and Western powers. Syria was thus a status symbol for the Kremlin. Putin, who sees Russia as a great power on par with the US and China, attaches
With Washington substantially off-guard in power transition, China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping (習近平), is intensifying an anti-corruption campaign against the top military leadership. At a glance, the move seems to be consistent with his emphasis on the necessity of enhancing military preparedness for a possible full military invasion of Taiwan, because the military is required to be well-disciplined without corruption. Looking carefully, however, a series of purges of several top military leaders since last year begs the question of what dynamics has worked behind the anomaly. More specifically, general Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) and his immediate successor, Li Shangfu (李尚福), were removed as People’s
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
The rise of drones — tactical, maritime and integrated drone missiles — and their application on the battlefield is fundamentally changing the character of warfare. Taiwan must be at the forefront of these shifts to leverage their potential, especially in boosting deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Drones are revolutionizing modern warfare, introducing new tactical and strategic dimensions, and providing smaller, less equipped forces with the ability to challenge and overcome larger powers, as seen with Ukraine’s resistance against Russia’s invasion and the ousting of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad by rebels led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). In an interview
RSS