Legislator Shen Fu-hsiung (
Now, a DPP heavyweight is voluntarily raising it again and some of the party's legislators have echoed his view, an indication that, seven months after the DPP government took office, DPP legislators are gradually moving away from the difficult position of "silent consent" toward the minority government to an "open admission of failure." But whether this understanding on the part of DPP legislators can translate into understanding on the part of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is another matter. Even though Shen is the spokesperson for the DPP's Mainstream Alliance (主流聯盟), his policy stances over the past seven months have been largely "non-mainstream."
A considerable number of lawmakers have supported Shen's call this time, but whether it will be received as a "lucky magpie" or as a bad luck "blackbird" in the party remains to be seen. It could even become a target for the DPP to vent its anger after the party's failures.
Back when the new government was being established, this author provided some suggestions in an article entitled Policy-making model for a minority government.
Unfortunately, the new government was not able to see the reality. Instead, it has run in exactly the opposite direction and ended up in an awkward situation -- with the KMT making laws and regulations for the DPP to implement. Even if a coalition government is formed, it is very likely to split if the DPP continues to hang on to A-bian's election platforms and refuses to loosen its grip on power or change its combative habits.
I am afraid, therefore, that the political situation will continue to deteriorate if a coalition government is viewed as a shelter to cover the DPP's inept rule or a means of passing responsibility.
To establish a coalition government, the DPP must humbly admit its failure. What is more, it must face up to two questions. First, should it resume the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant?
Second, should it accept the Guidelines for National Unification (
After all, the current political chaos was stirred up by the nuclear plant issue. These issues must be clarified before any negotiation on a coalition government can begin. Only then can the coalition have a stable foundation for cooperation.
But does a lack of coalition government make it impossible to seek majority support in the Legislative Yuan, or to stabilize the political situation?
According to Shen's view, a coalition government hinges on the premise of a legislative election. But it is not possible to bring forward the next legislative election. Since the election won't be held until December, the current political chaos will have to continue for another year. Can the Taiwan public put up with it?
The most urgent matter is to establish a policy-making mechanism for a minority government before setting up any coalition. The first thing to do is to give up the policy-making model which involves the executive branch taking the lead over the legislative branch. Don't roll out a policy first and then scramble to negotiate with the Legislature and ask for support from lawmakers. Secondly, recognize the KMT's majority advantage in the Legislature. Get vice-ministerial level officials to attend the KMT caucus' regular breakfast meetings, a mechanism for policy negotiations. Thirdly, the ruling and opposition caucuses should reach an initial consensus on a policy formulation before the Executive Yuan sends out a bill for legislative review. Fourthly, give up policy platforms that will anger the opposition.
The Executive Yuan shouldn't send any controversial bills that will trigger a showdown between the ruling and opposition parties. Five, the Executive Yuan should play an active role in reversing so-called "policy vote-buying" (
To avoid becoming the Legislature's executive department, the Executive Yuan should file "reconsideration" proposals (
Just before the partisan showdown on the working hours issue, Chen publicly criticized some people for "harboring an anti-A-Bian complex," to which he attributed the political chaos facing Taiwan.
But his point also showed the solution to the chaos. If the Executive Yuan forgets about A-bian's election platforms and is not overshadowed by A-bian, the opposition will lose its focus and desire for struggle. Only then will cooperation be possible between the ruling and opposition parties.
The biggest disease currently besetting the new government is its obsession with appearances and with A-bian's policy platforms. Trying too hard to realize "A-bian's will" leads to dictatorship by the executive branch.
If the executive branch is not backed up by the legislative branch, we have the kind of political chaos we are witnessing today.
While echoing Shen's call for a coalition Cabinet, I would like to call once again for a policy-making mechanism for the minority government. I hope the people in power will clearly see the political reality in which domination by the executive branch has become a thing of the past.
Letting the Legislative Yuan serve as a policy-making center is highly compatible with parliamentary politics in the first place. This is not merely a policy-making mechanism that the minority government should accept, but also a model for Taiwan's future democratic politics.
The spirit of the Constitution lies in having the Legislative Yuan make laws and the Executive Yuan implement them.
Lee Ching-hsiung is a legislator from the Taiwan Independence Party.
Translated by Francis Huang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
RSS