The Legislative Yuan shamed Taiwan again yesterday by electing Lo Fu-chu (羅福助), the self-confessed "spiritual leader" of Taiwan's biggest crime syndicate, as convener of its Judiciary Committee. Not to be outdone, Gary Wang (王令麟), out on bail until Wednesday following the Taiwan Development (台開) probe in which he has been charged with forgery and breach of trust, got himself elected convener of the Finance Committee.
It was not the first time Lo and Wang have been elected to these committees. But yesterday's election of the legislature's committee conveners was the first since the new government came to office. Obviously, the transition of political power has had no effect whatsoever on the deplorable nature of the legislature, which often seems little more than a sanctuary for brigands masquerading as a parliament.
The recent crackdown on "black gold" has made some lawmakers feel unsafe, even behind the shield of their constitutionally guaranteed immunity from prosecution. As a result, they have sought influence in legislative committees through which, utilizing the committees' power to review budgets and regulations of specific government agencies, they can exert pressure to be left alone to get on with their criminal activities.
It might be argued in the legislature's defense that since neither Lo nor Wang have been convicted of any wrongdoing, they are perfectly entitled to stand as candidates in the elections for convener. But the law is only a minimal ethical standard. We should demand standards far higher from elected representatives, recipients of the people's trust. Yesterday's absurdities could not have happened if our legislators, some of whom perhaps are actually law-abiding, had been capable of feeling and acting upon a sense of shame over their colleagues being implicated in criminal cases, or if they had been the least bit sensitive to public opinion. This was not to be, and Taiwan can only be the worse for it.
If this thunderhead has any silver lining at all it might be in the DPP caucus's successfully talking their colleague Chen Sheng-hung (陳勝宏) -- who also has a case pending against him -- out of running for the position of convener of the Judiciary Committee, and replacing him with Lee Ching-hsiung (李慶雄). Perhaps this successful screening by the DPP may prevent the legislature's reputation from hitting rock bottom.
The legislature is rotten to the core; who or what is to blame?
First of all, we could blame the multiple-member district electoral system, which allows questionable politicians to nudge their way into the legislature by controlling small groups of voters. We could also blame the "legislator at large" (不分區立委) system, whereby tycoons can get themselves nominated as legislators -- rather than having to win an election -- by funding the election campaigns of a few party favorites. We can also blame political parties that nominated "black gold" politicians as candidates in legislative elections. The KMT has begun to pay for its sins with the loss of central government power, but this process has far to go.
But we must also blame the electorate, for lacking the courage to resist vote-buying and social pressure, and for selling their country for a measly couple of thousand dollars each. We must also blame the government for not cracking down on "black gold" earlier and for not being more efficient in their crackdown.
The lamentable results of yesterday's elections have made one thing clear: the foundation of political reform lies in the reform of the legislature, which in turn depends on a commitment throughout society to clean itself up. Next year's legislative elections will allow us to pass judgement on this rotten legislature, but they will also allow the outside world to pass judgment on what kind of a society we want to build. Let us hope that judgment is not adverse.
With polls in as many as 76 countries, 2024 is the biggest election year in history. This year’s raft of elections has already produced a left-leaning government in Britain, political gridlock in France, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s return to office for a third term, and the elevation of the pro-sovereignty William Lai (賴清德) as Taiwan’s president, but with his Democratic Progressive Party losing its majority in the legislature. But no election will have a greater global impact than the one in the US. Whether American voters elect Kamala Harris or Donald Trump as the next president, and whether the Republicans
Minnesota Governor and Democratic US vice presidential candidate Tim Walz has connections to China dating back decades that could help inform US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ approach to the world’s second-biggest economy, but might also spell trouble with leaders in Beijing and Republicans back home. The little-known Minnesota governor taught English in China’s southern Guangdong Province in 1989 and 1990, making him the first person on a presidential ticket to have that kind of experience living in the country since former US president George H.W. Bush, who served as US ambassador in Beijing in the 1970s. Walz
There is an old saying in Chinese that essentially means that when an academic tries to reason with a warrior, they might as well be talking to a wall. Times have changed, and military men are far more reasonable now than when this saying emerged. Retired army general Yu Pei-chen (于北辰) is a good example of this. Today, academics are now often the ones who cannot be reasoned with. Alice Ou (區桂芝), who teaches Chinese Literature at Taipei First Girls’ High School, and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), who is also an associate professor at National Tsing Hua
Last week, the South China Morning Post reported that Chinese academics and strategists have proposed the creation of a “shadow government” for Taiwan. The plan involves setting up a fully prepared administrative body, referred to as the “Central Taiwan Work Committee,” which would be ready to take over in Taiwan immediately upon unification — whether achieved through peaceful means or military action. The proposal emphasizes the committee’s role in swiftly assuming control of the island’s administration if unification were to occur. The proposed committee would handle tasks such as currency conversion and infrastructure integration between Taiwan and China, while also encouraging