Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table.
In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US.
“The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said.
Photo: Bloomberg
Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of the Taipei-based Confederation of Asia-Pacific Chambers of Commerce and Industry, on Saturday said that TSMC’s orders are currently at full capacity, especially with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), where demand for high-end chips exceeds supply and there are no viable substitutes.
That means that TSMC is a price-setter in the market, rather than a price-taker, Chiu said.
As a result, the more tariffs imposed on TSMC chips, the higher the costs US importers would have to bear, which could lead to inflation and ultimately be passed on to domestic consumers.
Unlike the US tariffs on Chinese products such as plastics, where importers can switch to suppliers from countries such as Vietnam, “TSMC’s chips cannot be easily replaced, even Intel struggles to produce them,” he said.
Eventually, US importers would have no choice but to pay the higher tariffs, he said.
Given that Trump’s advisers are highly respected economic academics, who would certainly not introduce a tariff policy without having considered its impact on the competitiveness of the US AI sector, what Trump really wants is probably to force TSMC to the negotiating table, Chiu said.
Meanwhile, Hsieh Chin-ho (謝金河), chairman of the Chinese-language Wealth Magazine, on Saturday said that he believes Trump hopes to pressure TSMC into increasing its investment in the US.
He said that TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, should extend goodwill toward the Trump administration.
Taipei-based former Bloomberg Opinion columnist Tim Culpan in an online opinion piece on Friday said that if Trump goes further than stand-alone chips and adds import duties to a broader category of semiconductor products including graphics processing units, modules and subsystems, then the results could be “disastrous.”
“The US doesn’t have the capacity to manufacture anywhere near a similar volume of equivalent devices. It would take months, if not years, to build the factories, spin up the tools, and then go through the qualification process,” he wrote in the article titled “How a TSMC Tax Would be a FAFO Move for the US.”
In the opinion piece, Culpan said that the US could impose a tax on Taiwanese chips, but it would hurt the very companies Trump used to bolster his tech credentials.
TSMC would not be the one to suffer the most if Trump imposes the tariff hike, Culpan said.
“The company is capacity constrained in advanced-packaging for AI chips and clients have no other choice,” he wrote.
“In fact, the biggest victims would be the three men who so proudly and obsequiously fawned over the new president the first full day he was in office: Larry Ellison, Sam Altman and Masayoshi Son,” he said.
Ellison, Altman and Son head Oracle Corp, OpenAI and Softbank Group Corp respectively.
“What I think Trump really wants is for TSMC to kiss the ring and pledge to invest more in the US,” he wrote.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
SUPPORT: The government said it would help firms deal with supply disruptions, after Trump signed orders imposing tariffs of 25 percent on imports from Canada and Mexico The government pledged to help companies with operations in Mexico, such as iPhone assembler Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), shift production lines and investment if needed to deal with higher US tariffs. The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday announced measures to help local firms cope with the US tariff increases on Canada, Mexico, China and other potential areas. The ministry said that it would establish an investment and trade service center in the US to help Taiwanese firms assess the investment environment in different US states, plan supply chain relocation strategies and
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such