In an industrial underground space in central London, models in contrasting period dresses and playful streetwear strutted down a brightly lit London Fashion Week runway.
Unlike most other shows, all the floral dresses, trending workwear and double-denim outfits were secondhand at the event by charity Oxfam and online used clothes retailer Vinted’s “Style for Change.”
Bay Garnett, a sustainable fashion pioneer who picked out the pieces from Oxfam’s warehouses, called the runway “really exciting.”
Photo: AFP
“When we first did this show eight years ago, it was really not like this,” Garnett said backstage, noting the stream of enthusiastic attendees.
Despite the excitement surrounding the Oxfam show alongside another “pre-loved” runway by online auction site eBay Inc, British fashion is struggling with sustainability.
About 44 percent of all British companies overall have put in place a structured climate action plan, according to insurance company Aviva PLC’s “Climate-Ready Index.”
Photo: AFP
By contrast, the fashion world is lagging sorely behind, a situation the Collective Fashion Justice (CFJ) charity said was “an embarrassment.”
A recent CFJ report found that just seven of the 206 members of the British Fashion Council (BFC), which organizes London Fashion Week, had set out targets to reduce their carbon emissions.
Only five of them — or less than 2.5 percent — had goals aligned with the 2016 Paris Agreement to cut global warming, CFJ said.
The UK is the third largest footwear and clothing market in the world, after China and the US, an analysis by the FashionUnited platform showed.
A report released in 2018 by sustainability consultancy Quantis said the sectors account for about 8 percent of planet-heating greenhouse gas emissions.
Luxury fashion giant Burberry Group PLC — a London Fashion Week veteran — is one of the handful of brands publishing scientific targets.
Known for its tartan branding, the fashion house recently raised its emission reduction goals and hopes to be carbon neutral by 2040.
However, BFC chief executive Caroline Rush said that was not enough.
“To set carbon reduction targets, you need a team to be able to measure your targets, understand how to reduce them and then report on them,” she said. “For a small business that’s quite a challenge.”
To help, the BFC has about 50 businesses that would go through its “low carbon transition” program for designers.
Ideally, the program should be extended to help brands monitor and report their carbon reduction plans, advocates said.
Copenhagen Fashion Week has taken its own step to require all brands involved to meet a series of environmental goals.
In the US, reform could come with a “Fashion Act” under consideration by New York authorities, which would legally require businesses to cut emissions and take into account those of their entire supply chains.
“I think a lot of the issue is [that] the fashion industry can try to handball its problems to other industries,” CFJ director Emma Hakansson said.
For example, while there are many discussions on the climate impact of the meat industry, there was not the same pressure on producers of such materials as leather, wool and cashmere, she said.
Yet the latter “are coming from the same supply chains,” which use large quantities of water and emit methane, she added.
There are a number of solutions to make fashion “greener,” some of which would be on display at London Fashion Week, which started on Thursday and ends on Tuesday.
Taiwanese designer Ray Chu (朱柏諺) has created a vegan leather made using recycled tea leaves, while Romanian designer Ancuta Sarca uses recycled materials in her footwear collections.
However, such innovations could struggle to keep up with the scale of emissions and textile waste.
About 300 tonnes of clothes are thrown away every year in the UK, a 2020 British parliament report showed.
Since then, the popularity of fast fashion brands such as Hennes & Mauritz AB’s H&M and Inditex SA’s Zara, and ultra-fast fashion brands like Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu, has only grown.
Such brands sell cheaply made, mass-manufactured clothes at breakneck speeds, only for them to fall apart or be discarded after being worn a few times.
While many brands are turning to recycled materials, or offering clothing repair or rental services, the long-term solution seems to be to “slow down our habits of consumption in general,” Hakansson said.
To help with this, people could work toward “cultivating a sense of personal style,” she said.
“If you don’t know what you as an individual like, then you’re much more likely to follow these micro trends that are being really pushed on us very hard,” she added.
With greater awareness of the challenges posed by climate change, shopping second-hand has become more popularity, Garnett said.
“The kids have basically got the idea that ... secondhand — it’s a cool way to shop. By finding your own style, a one-off piece, it [becomes] like a style choice,” she said.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
RSS