From Alphabet Inc’s Google to Netflix Inc, prominent US companies are battling Internet boycott calls over their perceived political leanings in a polarizing election season that has exposed them to what researchers call “brand disinformation.”
The online campaigns — which falsely claim that Netflix and Google are funding or favoring Democratic presidential nominee US Vice President Kamala Harris, ahead of the November election — illustrate how brands are vulnerable to political falsehoods that can expose them to financial perils.
Those calling for a boycott include fake accounts on X, researchers said.
Photo: Reuters
The site is owned by Elon Musk, who has endorsed former US president Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, and appears to exert an outsized influence on voters through the platform, which has become a hotbed of disinformation.
The recent boycott calls targeting Netflix, which also spread on TikTok and Instagram, were triggered by false claims of a US$7 million donation from the streaming service to Harris’ campaign, Agence France-Presse fact-checkers reported.
Netflix CEO Reed Hastings contributed to Harris’ campaign, but the company said it was a “personal donation.”
Still, calls to “cancel Netflix” flooded social media sites, with many users falsely claiming the company was indirectly funding the Harris campaign. Some shared screenshots of their canceled subscriptions.
Nearly one-quarter of the boycott calls on X were traced to fake profiles, which have consistently expressed support for Trump through the past year, the disinformation security company Cyabra said.
“Brand disinformation campaigns in today’s polarized climate have far-reaching impacts beyond just corporate reputation,” Cyabra CEO Dan Brahmy said.
“The Netflix case demonstrates how rapidly these campaigns spread, potentially reaching hundreds of millions” and shows how “disinformation can manipulate public opinion and consumer behavior,” he said.
As the hotly contested election nears, “brands must be vigilant,” Brahmy said.
Similar boycott calls targeted Google after unfounded claims that it censors election-related content and manipulates search engine results in favor of Harris.
Cyabra identified hundreds of fake profiles on X — many with a recent history of pro-Trump content — that have called for a boycott of the tech giant while promoting another search engine.
Musk, who has repeatedly criticized Google, played a “significant role in amplifying negative content” against the company, Cyabra said in a report.
“Wow, Google has a search ban on President Donald Trump! Election interference?” Musk wrote in an evidence-free post late last month.
Google did not respond when asked about the allegations or the effect of the boycott calls.
Earlier this month, a survey by the business ratings and online reviews platform Sitejabber showed that 30 percent of respondents had boycotted a brand over political reasons in the past 12 months, while 41 percent said they prefer that companies keep their “political positions private.”
“Brands face a delicate balancing act this election year,” Sitejabber CEO Michael Lai said. “While staying apolitical may seem safe, it’s important for businesses to understand that even neutrality can be interpreted as a position.”
A survey by market research firm Certus Insights showed that people were divided over whether corporations should engage in partisan politics, with more than half the respondents saying companies should refrain from doing so.
Other surveys suggest that people consider it the brand’s fault if its advertising appears next to polarizing, false or defamatory content.
Such concerns have prompted many advertisers to abandon X, which has scaled back content moderation and restored once-banned accounts known to peddle disinformation or hate following Musk’s 2022 acquisition of the platform.
Some also left in light of Musk’s own controversial musings on the site.
Earlier this month, X sued an advertising group and several large corporations, accusing them of causing billions of dollars of losses by “illegally” boycotting his site.
“Disinformation creates chaos and distrust. Brands normally benefit from a well-informed society,” said Claire Atkin, cofounder and chief executive of the anti-disinformation watchdog Check My Ads.
“On the Internet, advertisers have let tech companies take their ads away from the news and straight into the arms of bad actors. Now, unfortunately, we are all experiencing the consequences,” she said.
Nvidia Corp’s demand for advanced packaging from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) remains strong though the kind of technology it needs is changing, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) said yesterday, after he was asked whether the company was cutting orders. Nvidia’s most advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chip, Blackwell, consists of multiple chips glued together using a complex chip-on-wafer-on-substrate (CoWoS) advanced packaging technology offered by TSMC, Nvidia’s main contract chipmaker. “As we move into Blackwell, we will use largely CoWoS-L. Of course, we’re still manufacturing Hopper, and Hopper will use CowoS-S. We will also transition the CoWoS-S capacity to CoWos-L,” Huang said
Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) is expected to miss the inauguration of US president-elect Donald Trump on Monday, bucking a trend among high-profile US technology leaders. Huang is visiting East Asia this week, as he typically does around the time of the Lunar New Year, a person familiar with the situation said. He has never previously attended a US presidential inauguration, said the person, who asked not to be identified, because the plans have not been announced. That makes Nvidia an exception among the most valuable technology companies, most of which are sending cofounders or CEOs to the event. That includes
INDUSTRY LEADER: TSMC aims to continue outperforming the industry’s growth and makes 2025 another strong growth year, chairman and CEO C.C. Wei says Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), a major chip supplier to Nvidia Corp and Apple Inc, yesterday said it aims to grow revenue by about 25 percent this year, driven by robust demand for artificial intelligence (AI) chips. That means TSMC would continue to outpace the foundry industry’s 10 percent annual growth this year based on the chipmaker’s estimate. The chipmaker expects revenue from AI-related chips to double this year, extending a three-fold increase last year. The growth would quicken over the next five years at a compound annual growth rate of 45 percent, fueled by strong demand for the high-performance computing
TARIFF TRADE-OFF: Machinery exports to China dropped after Beijing ended its tariff reductions in June, while potential new tariffs fueled ‘front-loaded’ orders to the US The nation’s machinery exports to the US amounted to US$7.19 billion last year, surpassing the US$6.86 billion to China to become the largest export destination for the local machinery industry, the Taiwan Association of Machinery Industry (TAMI, 台灣機械公會) said in a report on Jan. 10. It came as some manufacturers brought forward or “front-loaded” US-bound shipments as required by customers ahead of potential tariffs imposed by the new US administration, the association said. During his campaign, US president-elect Donald Trump threatened tariffs of as high as 60 percent on Chinese goods and 10 percent to 20 percent on imports from other countries.