A US judge on Monday handed Alphabet Inc’s Google a major legal blow, ruling in a landmark antitrust case that it has maintained a monopoly with its dominant search engine.
The court decision against a “big tech” giant could alter how the sector operates
US District Court Judge Amit Mehta found that Google had a monopoly for search and for text advertisements through exclusive distribution agreements that made it the “default” option that people were likely to use on devices.
Photo: AP
“After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” Mehta wrote in his ruling.
The Internet behemoth “has a major, largely unseen advantage over its rivals: default distribution,” he wrote.
The antitrust trial pitting US prosecutors and nearly a dozen states against Google ended in May.
At the heart of the government’s case was the massive payments made by Google to Apple Inc and other companies to keep its world-leading search engine as the default on iPhones, Web browsers and other products.
US Department of Justice lawyers argued that Google achieved and perpetuated its dominance — and strangled rivals — through these default deals that also expanded to Samsung Electronics Co and other device makers.
“This victory against Google is a historic win for the American people,” US Attorney General Merrick Garland said. “No company — no matter how large or influential — is above the law.”
Google would appeal the verdict, Alphabet global affairs president and chief legal officer Kent Walker said.
Walker pointed out that Mehta concludes Google is the industry’s highest-quality search engine, particularly on mobile devices.
“Given this, and that people are increasingly looking for information in more and more ways, we plan to appeal,” Walker said. “As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use.”
It remained to be seen what remedies or damages the judge might order in the case.
In one possible good sign for Google, Mehta concluded in his ruling that the technology titan’s contravention of the US Sherman Antitrust Act did not have “anticompetitive effects.”
“Google’s loss in its search antitrust trial could be a huge deal — depending on the remedy,” Emarketer senior analyst Evelyn Mitchell-Wolf said.
“A forced divestiture of the search business would sever Alphabet from its largest source of revenue,” she said.
Even losing the option of making exclusive deals to be the default option on browsers, smartphones or computers would hurt Google, she added.
Google’s search business would be hampered as generative artificial intelligence wielded by Microsoft Corp’s Bing and OpenAI’s budding “SearchGPT” ramp up competition.
“The biggest winner from today’s ruling isn’t consumers or little tech, it’s Microsoft,” Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. “Microsoft has underinvested in search for decades, but today’s ruling opens the door to a court mandate of default deals for Bing.”
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process