As Taiwan is accelerating its drafting of regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) following the European Council’s passage of the EU AI Act, IBM suggested that local regulators focus on regulating the use of the transformative technology to address various risks, including the generation of falsehoods and issues of bias.
Paul Burton, general manager of IBM Asia-Pacific, offered his advice on AI regulations in an exclusive interview with the Taipei Times last week. During his 36-hour trip to Taiwan, Burton met with IBM’s key clients in the financial services and banking sectors.
“I think there are certain principles that I think are good. One of them is not to regulate the development of technology, but to regulate the use of technology,” Burton said. “The regulation should never hinder the development of technology itself.”
Photo: Bloomberg
The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) on Thursday released its official guidelines, offering instructions for financial institutions and banks to introduce AI tools and manage potential risks based on four categories of AI life cycles. About one-third of 377 financial institutions, mostly banks, have adopted AI tools for customer services, risk evaluations and other functions, the FSC data showed.
By the end of October, the National Science and Technology Council would be ready with a draft AI basic law for various businesses, as rapidly developing generative AI technology poses risks of intellectual property infringement, limited transparency in how the systems function, issues of bias and fairness, or security concerns.
“I do not want to recommend any for Taiwan. Taiwan should come up with its own laws,” Burton said when asked if he would suggest any references.
With implementation of the EU AI Act imminent, many countries are moving ahead with robust regulations and guidelines, but business leaders around the world are feeling pressure to prepare, Burton said.
They are not exactly sure what they are preparing for, he said.
Based on IBM’s “2024 CEO Study,” few than 60 percent of global executives think their organizations are prepared for AI regulation and 69 percent expect a regulatory fine due to generative AI adoption, Burton said.
In the face of this uncertainty and risk, CEOs are pumping the brakes, he said.
More than half, or 56 percent, are delaying major investments until they have clarity on AI standards and regulations, he said.
Overall, 72 percent of executives say their organizations will forgo generative AI benefits due to ethical concerns, he said.
As the financial service sector is IBM’s cash cow, the company launched the Watsonx platform, opening up exciting prospects in financial advisory and data analysis, Burton said.
Configuring generative AI models correctly can simplify complex financial concepts and make them easier for customers to understand in deterministic financial environments, he said.
Financial institutions need to use generative AI thoughtfully to find the right balance between innovation and ethical practices, he added.
Banking is among the industries that could see the biggest impact as a percentage of their revenues from generative AI, especially in terms of customer operations, marketing and sales, banking software, and risk and legal compliance, Burton said.
Across the banking industry, for example, the technology could deliver value equal to an additional US$200 billion to US$340 billion annually if just currently identified use cases are fully implemented, he said, citing the estimates by the World Economic Forum last year.
As IBM is at the forefront of technologies like AI, hybrid cloud and quantum computing, the company built a powerful AI governance into its Watsonx platform and developed quantum-safe cryptography to secure sensitive data, he said.
It is why IBM advocates for smart AI regulation, including holding those who develop and deploy AI accountable for fraudulent, discriminatory and harmful activity, he said.
It is also why IBM and Meta announced the formation of the AI Alliance, a group of more than 70 organizations dedicated to advancing open, safe and responsible AI, he said.
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
Taiwan’s official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) last month rose 0.2 percentage points to 54.2, in a second consecutive month of expansion, thanks to front-loading demand intended to avoid potential US tariff hikes, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. While short-term demand appeared robust, uncertainties rose due to US President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policy, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) told a news conference in Taipei. Taiwan’s economy this year would be characterized by high-level fluctuations and the volatility would be wilder than most expect, Lien said Demand for electronics, particularly semiconductors, continues to benefit from US technology giants’ effort
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US
RSS