Finance chiefs from the G7 industrial democracies yesterday began a two-day meeting in Italy seeking to present a common front on the need to provide a loan to Ukraine and oppose China’s “unfair” industrial policies.
However, comments from officials ahead of the gathering in Stresa, northern Italy, suggest no hard details would emerge on a US push for a loan to Ukraine backed by the future income from US$300 billion of frozen Russian assets.
“We will be putting a proposal to use the windfall profits for the Russian assets for the years to come,” French Minster of Finance Bruno Le Maire told reporters ahead of the opening session, a broad review of the global economy.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“So, let’s compare the proposals. Let’s see what is the most convenient, the most efficient, the most rapid proposal that could be put in place,” Le Maire said.
The loan could amount to about US$50 billion, but no amounts have been agreed, US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen has said.
Meanwhile, other G7 officials involved in the negotiations voiced caution, citing thorny legal and technical aspects to be hammered out.
The ministers would be joined today by Ukrainian Minister of Finance Serhiy Marchenko, whose country has been struggling to contain a Russian offensive in the north and the east for more than two years.
German Minister of Finance Christian Lindner said that there were still many questions on the loan proposal and he did not expect the G7 to reach any concrete decision in Stresa.
Combating China’s growing export strength would be another central theme of the meeting, after the US last week unveiled steep tariff hikes on Chinese imports, including electric vehicle batteries, computer chips and medical products.
Yellen on Thursday said that she wanted the US’ G7 partners — Japan, Germany, France, the UK, Italy and Canada — to show that they stood with Washington.
It is necessary to avoid a trade war with Beijing, which is an “economic partner,” but the G7 needs to protect its industrial interests, Le Maire said.
“A trade war is neither in the interest of the US, nor China, nor Europe, nor any country in the world,” he said. “Nevertheless, we have an issue with the unfair trade practices, with the high level of subsidies, and with [China’s] industrial overcapacities.”
It might only be a matter of time before the EU followed the US’ lead on tariffs, Italian Minister of Economy and Finance Giancarlo Giorgetti said. He is the chair of the Stresa gathering, as Rome holds the G7 presidency this year.
“The US has taken very tough decisions and Europe will probably have to consider whether to do the same,” he told Italian state television RAI yesterday.
Italy had been hoping to use the summit to revive blocked talks on a global minimum tax on multinationals, but Giorgetti said the deal would not be finalized by next month, as was previously planned.
He said the US, India and China have reservations over the terms of the deal, which was signed by about 140 countries in 2021, but has never been fully implemented.
The G7 would also address a proposed global wealth tax on billionaires, promoted by Brazil and France among the broader G20 developed countries.
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process