Millions of dollars in sales of North Korean false eyelashes — marketed in beauty stores around the world as “made in China” — helped drive a recovery in the secretive state’s exports last year.
The processing and packaging of North Korean false eyelashes — openly conducted in neighboring China, the country’s largest trading partner — gives Kim Jong-un’s regime a way to skirt international sanctions, providing a vital source of foreign currency.
Reuters spoke to 20 people — including 15 in the eyelash industry, as well as trade lawyers and experts on North Korea’s economy — who described a system in which China-based firms import semifinished products from North Korea, which are then completed and packaged as Chinese.
Photo: Reuters
The finished eyelashes are then exported to markets including the West, Japan and South Korea, said eight people who work for companies directly involved in the trade.
Some of the people spoke on condition that only their surnames be used because they were not authorized to talk to the media.
North Korea has long been a major exporter of hair products such as wigs and false lashes, which enable people to avoid the hassle of mascara and to achieve a dramatic look, but exports tumbled during the COVID-19 pandemic, when North Korea slammed its borders tightly shut.
Photo: Reuters
Significant trade in North Korea-made lashes via China resumed last year, according to customs documents and four people in the industry.
Chinese customs data showed that North Korea’s exports to China more than doubled last year, when borders reopened. China is the destination for nearly all of North Korea’s declared exports.
Wigs and eyelashes comprised almost 60 percent of declared North Korean exports to China last year. In total, North Korea exported 1,680 tonnes of false eyelashes, beards and wigs to China last year, worth about US$167 million.
In 2019, when prices were lower, it exported 1,829 tonnes at a value of just US$31.1 million.
The US Department of State and international experts estimate that North Korea seizes up to 90 percent of foreign income generated by its citizens, many of whom live in poverty.
Reuters was unable to determine how much of the revenue from eyelash sales flowed back to Kim’s government, or how it was used.
“We have to assume that ... millions of dollars every month that North Korea is making through this eyelash trade is being used for the Kim Jong-un regime,” Seoul-based sanctions lawyer Shin Tong-chan said.
His view was corroborated by two other international trade experts, although none provided specific evidence.
North Korea did not respond to requests for comment for this story sent to its UN missions in New York and Geneva, its embassy in Beijing and its consular office in the Chinese border city of Dandong.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson said that Beijing and Pyongyang “are friendly neighbors” and that “normal cooperation between the two countries that is lawful and compliant should not be exaggerated.”
Since 2006, the UN Security Council has sought to stall Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons program through nearly a dozen sanctions resolutions that restrict its ability to trade products such as coal, textiles and oil. It also imposed strict restrictions on North Koreans working abroad.
Sanctions passed by the Security Council are supposed to be enforced by UN member states — all of whom are legally bound to implement them — using local legislation.
However, there is no direct ban on hair products, so trading false eyelashes from North Korea does not necessarily contravene international law, three sanctions experts said.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it was “not aware of the circumstances” described, but that any alleged contraventions of UN sanctions are “completely without foundation.”
The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not comment on the findings, but said that Tokyo, which bans trade with Pyongyang, would continue to consider “the most effective approach” toward North Korea.
The European External Action Service, the EU’s diplomatic service, did not return requests for comment on North Korean-made eyelashes sold in its jurisdiction.
The US has since 2008 separately expanded its own measures against North Korea, which include sanctions on any company stocking or selling products whose sales fund the Kim regime: a restriction that also applies to non-US firms using the US dollar.
However, there are practical and political limitations on Washington’s ability to enforce such sanctions unilaterally on entities such as foreign businesses that have minimal exposure to the US financial system and do not sell primarily to US clients, two international sanctions lawyers said.
A US Department of Treasury spokesperson said that it “actively enforces the range of our broad North Korea sanctions authorities against both US and foreign firms” and would “continue to aggressively target any revenue generation efforts” by Pyongyang.
The treasury department also referenced its nearly US$1 million settlement with e.l.f. Cosmetics in 2019 over allegations that the US-based firm inadvertently sold false eyelashes containing materials from North Korea.
Its parent company said in a 2019 filing that it discovered two suppliers had used North Korean materials during a “routine, self-administered audit” and that it quickly addressed the issue, which it determined was “not material.”
The company, which has since stopped selling false eyelashes, reiterated its commitment to making products legally and responsibly in a statement for this story.
Reuters was unable to establish whether any Western companies are currently involved in the North Korean eyelash trade.
The people involved in the industry said that Pingdu, an eastern Chinese town that bills itself the “eyelash capital of the world,” is a key node in the supply chain from North Korea.
Many Pingdu-based companies, such as Monsheery, package false eyelashes that are produced primarily by North Koreans, said Wang Tingting, whose family owns the firm, which exports products to the US, Brazil and Russia.
Wang said in an interview from her factory that North Korean goods had helped build Monsheery up from a small family workshop.
The company was founded in 2015, corporate records show.
“The quality of the North Korean product is much better,” Wang said, adding that she was unaware of any sanctions-related issues with using North Korean false eyelashes.
She declined to name her international clients.
Others in Pingdu said they are conscious of the role sanctions play in the complicated distribution chain.
“If not for these sanctions, there would be no need for [North Koreans] to export through China,” said Gao (高), who owns Yumuhui Eyelash.
Cui Huzhe, who represents a North Korean factory that works with a Chinese partner in a venture called the Korea-China Processing Joint Trading Co, said that the North Korean firm sends semifinished eyelashes to China, where they are sold to markets including the US, Europe, Japan and South Korea.
He declined to identify the two companies involved in the partnership or their clients. Subsequently, he could not be reached for comment on the sanctions implications.
Chinese manufacturers began working with North Korean eyelash plants in the early 2000s, three Chinese factory managers said.
They said they prize the country’s labor force for its low cost and the high quality of the eyelashes.
About 80 percent of Pingdu’s eyelash factories purchase or process false eyelash raw materials and semifinished products from North Korea, according to an estimate published last year by Kali, a Chinese manufacturer of eyelash boxes, on its Web site.
Pingdu’s government says the town of about 1.2 million accounts for 70 percent of global output of false eyelashes, which are often made of synthetic fibers, but might also be created from mink fur or human hair.
Trading company Asia Pacific International Network Technology Co, based in the Chinese border city of Hunchun, advertises on its Web site the services of three North Korean eyelash processing factories with images of workers arranging hairs and pasting them on paper.
Reached by phone, a company employee, who would not give her name, declined to comment.
Seoul-based businessman Johny Lee imports products such as chicken-feet shaped lashes used for extensions through Dandong into South Korea.
Those lashes are made by North Koreans, packaged in China, and then sold locally or exported to Asian countries such as Japan, said Lee, who chairs a trade group in Seoul that includes eyelash extension technicians from the West and South Korea.
Asked about legal risks, Lee — who began sourcing eyelashes from China a decade ago — said he was not selling “sophisticated technology like semiconductors.”
North Korean workers “are trying to make a living there,” he said.
South Korean law states that if two or more countries are involved in the production of imported goods, the place where the products gained “essential characteristics” would be deemed the country of origin.
Reuters described how eyelashes made by North Korean workers are packaged and completed in China to Shin Min-ho, a South Korea-certified customs attorney.
North Korea would likely be considered their country of origin because it gave the raw materials “essential characteristics,” he said.
Korea Customs Services said that “importing North Korean products disguised as Chinese can be punished,” but that it was “difficult to determine” country of origin based solely on Reuters’ description of the supply chain between North Korea and China, and that it was not investigating the issue.
Despite the quality of the eyelashes, North Korean labor is poorly paid.
North Korean salaries can be one-tenth of Chinese wages, four Chinese factory owners and managers said.
In addition, Wang, a manager for Pingdu-based manufacturer Co-Lash, which ceased North Korean operations during the pandemic, said the workers gave up most of their income to the state.
He did not supply proof.
Another Chinese manufacturer, PD Lush, pays workers at its factory in the North Korean border town of Rason — whose work is sold internationally — an average monthly salary of 300 yuan (US$42.12), Pingdu-based manager Wang said.
The centrality of North Korea to the industry became clear when the country’s borders closed during the pandemic.
Wang Tingting said that after North Korea closed its borders in 2020 due to the pandemic, ships carrying over the small amount of eyelashes exported during that time were often held up.
“We have very high demand on our side,” she said.
In the wake of the pandemic, supply was still not at full capacity and shipping delays were common, she added.
South Korean false eyelash brand Cinderella Amisolution typically procures supplies from Chinese traders of semifinished North Korean products, which it then sells to customers. When North Korea sealed its border, contractors sent samples that were not made by North Koreans.
“I thought: ‘This isn’t going to work,’” chief executive Choi Jee-won said. “They were completely different.”
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process