A Chinese chip designer, partly owned by the country’s top-sanctioned chipmaker, is purchasing US software and has US financial backing, relationships that underscore Washington’s difficulty in applying new rules meant to block US support for Beijing’s semiconductor industry.
The company, Brite Semiconductor Co (燦芯半導體), offers chip design services to at least six Chinese military suppliers, a Reuters examination of company statements, regulatory filings, tenders and academic articles by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) researchers and institutions found.
Its second-largest shareholder and top supplier, chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯), was placed on the so-called US “entity list” over alleged ties to Beijing’s military, effectively barring it from receiving some goods from US suppliers.
Photo: Reuters
Despite those relationships, Brite boasts funding from a US venture capital firm backed by Wells Fargo bank and a Christian university, and has continued access to sensitive US technology from two California-based software companies, Synopsys and Cadence Design, documents showed.
Reuters found no evidence that Brite’s relationships with US firms violate any regulations.
The administration of US President Joe Biden, with bipartisan support, has taken pains to stop the flow of technology and investment to Beijing’s chip sector, unveiling rules in October last year to halt some US exports of chips and chipmaking tools to China, and in August announcing a ban on certain new US investments in the industry. It also added dozens of Chinese companies to the entity list, many over ties to China’s military.
Although not an apparent breach of any US rules, Brite’s access demonstrates the challenges facing Washington’s bid to keep US equipment and money from being used to advance China’s military ambitions, and suggests the US would struggle to succeed unless it targets many more companies that have slipped under its radar.
US Republican Senator Marco Rubio, an influential China hawk and member of the foreign relations committee, characterized Reuters’ findings on Brite as “concerning.”
“Companies connected to China’s military supply chain should not have access to US technology and investment. The Biden administration’s haphazard approach to export controls and investment restrictions clearly is not working,” he said.
Others said Brite illustrates Beijing’s ability to use low-profile companies to skirt US export bans on big-name Chinese firms.
“Brite is a classic example of how a US-China joint venture could end up funneling valuable semiconductor technology to SMIC and the PLA,” said Martijn Rasser, managing director of Datenna, an open-source intelligence company.
SMIC, which holds a 19 percent stake in Brite, has long been in Washington’s crosshairs. The previous US administration added it to a list of “military end users” in November 2020.
Next, SMIC was added to the “entity list” over its apparent ties to the Chinese military industrial complex. SMIC has previously denied any ties to China’s military, saying that it manufactures chips and provides services “solely for civilian and commercial end-users and end-uses.”
Brite Semiconductor, founded in 2008 as a joint venture between US venture capitalists and Chinese firms, has longstanding ties to SMIC.
SMIC was Brite’s largest shareholder until last year. That stake turned Brite into “a bridge between China’s No. 1 foundry SMIC” and other companies with chip design needs, a presentation on its website showed. The 2021 presentation also notes that SMIC’s co-CEO serves as Brite’s current chairman of the board of directors.
About 85 percent of the funds Brite Semiconductor paid to all suppliers for goods and services last year went to SMIC, its October IPO prospectus showed.
Beyond its links to SMIC, Brite sells its chip design services to Shanghai-based ComNav Technology Ltd (上海司南衛星導航技術股份有限公司), which makes satellite navigation systems for China’s navy and the Strategic Support Force, the PLA unit that oversees information, electronic, and cyberwarfare, a Reuters review of articles authored by PLA researchers and military tenders shows.
Chinese tech companies with links to the Chinese military often get added to the entity list, but Brite has never faced such restrictions, public records show.
“It sure seems like they would be a candidate for an entity listing,” said Emily Kilcrease, a former trade official now at the Center for a New American Security, after reviewing Reuters’ findings.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares