Some of Japan’s most notable companies are feeling somewhat listless about being listed.
That might be the reason for the US$5 billion take-private offer for Taisho Pharmaceutical Co, the largest management buyout in Japanese history, announced last week.
With the founding Uehara family in control of a majority of shares, most expect the proposal to succeed even in the face of grumblings from minority shareholders, bringing to an end six decades as a public firm.
Photo: AP
Taisho might be the biggest, but is far from alone in choosing this path. Buyouts by management and controlling parties have surged this year in Japan, with the total value now set to pass ¥1 trillion (US$6.8 billion). Cram-school operator Benesse Holdings Inc and karaoke provider Shidax Corp are among firms also choosing to abandon public markets.
Expect this trend to continue: For many businesses, being public is no longer worth the hassle. For decades, a listing in Japan was easy street. Extensive cross-holdings ensured a compliant shareholder base; even if the domestic market was stagnant, the rise of China provided growth opportunities next door; and most of all, no one really expected stocks to deliver much of a return.
All that is changing. Now, everywhere management looks, there is a new annoyance. Activist investors are emboldened by recent successes and launching campaigns to bend boards to their will. The Tokyo Stock Exchange is increasingly breathing down executives’ necks, looking to nag them into compliance with the goal of boosting valuations. Who needs the hassle?
That might sum up the response of Tsuruha Holdings Inc. Despite victory against Oasis Management in the activist investor’s attempt to place directors on its board, the drugstore operator is reported to be talking to private-equity firms for a potential US$4 billion deal to take itself off the market. (Tsuruha says going private is nothing more than one option to boost shareholder value.)
The Tokyo Stock Exchange’s pressure campaign to enhance corporate returns and reduce the vast number of firms that trade below book value has been a key catalyst in the rally of Japanese stocks to new three-decade highs. A widely publicized revamp of markets last year was dismissed as a cosmetic exercise, but the bourse is now tightening the screws; next year, it plans to launch a “name and shame” list of firms that are not meeting its value goals.
Meanwhile, shareholder bases are being diversified with a gradual unwinding of cross-shareholdings. Toyota Motor Corp’s reported sale of a large chunk of its Denso Corp stake is the most high-profile example.
Combined with speculation that the Bank of Japan is nearing the end of its seven-year experiment with negative rates, and it encourages management to eye the exit.
Including other types of take-private deals, along with mergers and aquisitions and a reduction in “parent-child” listings, where the parent company and its subsidiary are both public, the number of listed companies in Tokyo is set to fall.
That is a good thing — the country has far too many listed that do not need to be.
The Prime segment of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, supposed to highlight the country’s best firms, has 1,655 constituents. That proliferation forces tracker funds to buy and sell highly illiquid stocks. About two-thirds of the country’s 4,000 or so listed firms have zero analyst coverage — heaven perhaps for value investors, but not for everyone. These little understood, albeit sometimes greatly undervalued companies drag down the broader indexes, leaving investors with the impression that Japanese stocks have little upside.
Compounding the problem is the fact that Japanese start-ups still often list too early, forcing them to focus too soon on profitability instead of growth. That is one reason the country has failed to produce a decacorn — a privately held company with a valuation that exceeds US$10 billion.
For many firms, there is little advantage to remaining public: Low rates make debt a more attractive option than dilutive share sales, while a once-lacking private equity sector has become increasingly sophisticated in the past decade, aiding businesses that need to be broken up and sold off.
When it comes to management buyouts, minority shareholders are frequently upset with the lack of a more transparent sales process — or a bidding war that could drive up valuations. Absent a well-coordinated activist campaign, these holders often have little choice but to accept what they are offered. The 55 percent premium from Taisho’s founding family might seem generous, but if a person was unfortunate enough to build their stake in 2018, they would need another 60 percent on top of that to break even.
However, that is partly explained by a particularly unique Japanese way of thinking about management’s responsibility to all stakeholders. Boards need to consider workers, suppliers and customers in their deliberations — invested parties would suffer if the firm was wound up and money returned to shareholders, as the business books would advise.
Consider the case of Culture Convenience Club Co, the operator of Japan’s equivalent of Blockbuster Video. Seeing the writing on the wall for that industry, it went private in 2011 in a ¥69.6 billion deal. It has since flourished as a unlisted firm, successfully pivoting to a line of upscale bookstores as demand for DVDs fell off. Blockbuster, of course, went under.
As pressure on boards intensifies, Tokyo is only likely to see more of them pursue this option.
The most-speculated-about of all potential deals is a long-rumored management buyout of SoftBank Group Corp by founder Masayoshi Son, who frequently complains that his company is undervalued by public markets.
Such a deal, if it ever materialized, would redefine how, and where, major firms see their future.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and South and North Korea. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares