Japanese companies are dropping out of offshore wind projects in Taiwan, one of fastest-growing markets for the technology, as rising costs and worsening delays plunge the industry into deeper trouble worldwide.
Oil refiner Eneos Holdings Inc last week said that it might exit the Yunlin Offshore Wind Project (允能雲林離岸風廠) after regional utility Shikoku Electric Power Co decided to pull out of the same project due to delays threatening its profitability.
Electricity generator JERA Co announced that it completed the sale of its stake in Formosa 3, another Taiwanese offshore wind project, in June.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Power Co
“The withdrawal of companies indicate that the attractive proposition of Taiwan’s offshore wind is diminishing, which might affect investor confidence in the sector,” said Diao Chenyuan (刁晨元), managing consultant for power and renewables research at Wood Mackenzie Ltd.
However, Japan’s Mitsui & Co has decided to continue investing in building offshore wind farm in Taiwan, teaming up with Canada’s Northland Power Inc, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said yesterday.
Spanish power company Iberdrola group, Blue Float Energy Co, France’s EDF group and Floatation Energy are also continuing with their plans to develop offshore wind farms, the ministry said.
Taiwan’s wind farms are part of a plan to increase the ratio of electricity coming from renewables to 20 percent by 2025, from 8 percent last year.
The nation aims to have 5.7 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by then, compared with 2.1GW now.
Taiwan is also looking to increase its use of natural gas, cut coal and eliminate nuclear power, but is falling behind schedule on its targets.
Fewer players in the market reduces competition and leads to undersubscription in tenders, and could jeopardize Taiwan’s targets, Diao said.
The troubles in Taiwan’s wind industry compound a crisis that has already hit other parts of the world, as the aftereffects of the COVID-19 pandemic push up the cost of labor and borrowing.
While many businesses are able to offset cost changes by raising prices, many wind developments find themselves locked into contracts to sell power at rates set years ago.
Denmark’s Orsted A/S this week withdrew from a partnership developing offshore wind in Norway due to rising costs, while BP PLC and Norway’s Equinor ASA recently took large impairments on projects.
US-based public utility Eversource Energy also incurred a US$331 million after-tax impairment charge in the second quarter for its offshore wind operations.
In Taiwan, rigid requirements mandating that developers procure 60 percent of their equipment from local manufacturers have made projects even more expensive, sometimes doubling costs.
The rules could lead to a sharp rise in offshore tariffs, saddling ratepayers with higher prices and bringing delays in installations, BloombergNEF Analyst Leo Wang said in a report this month.
Less experienced suppliers in new offshore wind markets also often offer products that are more expensive than their international peers and of lower quality, he said.
Additional reporting by Lisa Wang
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known