Sun, Nov 12, 2023 page12

• US gamblers skirt laws to bet big on 2024 elections

  • By Nicholas Roll / AFP, WASHINGTON
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Like many US political watchers, a Nevada resident named Domer had an opinion about who would emerge from turmoil within the Republican Party to become the next speaker of the US House of Representatives.

  Unlike most of them, he made US$13,000 when Mike Johnson was finally elected last month.

  That political gambling is illegal in the US has not deterred Domer (a nickname he provided) or others like him from using online overseas markets to wager on US politics.

  

  Money and dice lie in front of a screen showing political market odds in an illustration photograph taken in Los Angeles on Wednesday last week.

  Photo: AFP

  Domer, who said he earns about US$500,000 a year betting on politics across the globe including in Italy and South Africa, is often active in chatrooms on Discord and other sites that buzz with debate among aficionados.

  “There’s a lot of trash talk — it’s similar to sports betting,” he said. “It’s combative and congenial at the same time.”

  Political betting was common — and legal — in the US until the rise of relatively accurate polling in the 1930s.

  Futures trading regulations passed in 1936, as well as crackdowns on sports betting and the perception of gambling as seedy all helped put an end to markets that once populated Wall Street and the politics pages of newspapers.

  Today, critics still worry gambling could fuel corruption or the gamification of the political system.

  However, as the Internet has made gambling easier, people like Domer use virtual private networks to skirt around government regulators that have closed down sites or halted the entry of platforms that try to offer political betting to Americans.

  Only two have been able to stay alive, due to their affiliations with university research projects.

  The government moved last year to shut down one of them, PredictIt, alleging it had exceeded its research-focused mandate. It was granted a lifeline by a July court decision in its favor that would keep its lights on as litigation continues.

  Supporters say legal markets offer benefits to the public and traders alike, and the effect is negligible as bets are capped at a few hundred dollars.

  “These markets encourage attention to political events, and they serve as an antidote to fake news,” PredictIt CEO John Phillips said.

  “Prediction markets are not perfect,” he said, but they are “better than polling.”

  There are studies backing him up, although it is a contention that not all political scientists agree with. For better or worse, journalists stick almost exclusively with polls — which, traders say, also inform their bets.

  PredictIt is currently offering shares in US President Joe Biden being a presidential nominee for US$0.68, meaning a trader who bought a share would earn US$0.32 if he is the Democratic candidate in next year’s election, which is likely.

  However, bet big on California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has not even entered the race, and each share bought for US$0.23 would earn US$0.77, minus fees.

  Markets also deliver insights that polls do not always capture — not just about politics, but also economics, said Tom Gruca, director of the Iowa Electronic Markets, a political betting operation run at the University of Iowa, where he also teaches.

  “When you answer a poll, you tell people what you wish is going to happen,” unlike a market, which captures “what you think is going to happen,” he said.

  “Even a small amount of money changes the stakes for people,” Gruca said, describing a class where, after giving students money to trade, they were “ready to rip each other limb from limb over movements of US$0.10.”

  Political gambling expert Pratik Chougule also cashed in on a House speaker bet, cleaning up US$130 after Jim Jordan lost, and has most recently put about US$1,000 into Biden being the Democratic nominee.

  Chougule cohosts a betting podcast, and started an advocacy group to push for legalization.

  “I was a pretty true believer in the Iraq war... I had gotten that issue very wrong,” Chougule said. “I basically realized that bad prediction, bad forecasting in our policymaking is actually the norm, not the exception.”

  “Having skin in the game is at least an important consideration in doing better,” he added.

  For markets to work — for academic insights to be gleaned and riches to be won — there must also be losers.

  “I’m currently betting a lot of money that [former US president Donald] Trump will not be the GOP [Republican] nominee — which was what I thought was a smart bet a year ago, and is now looking like the world’s dumbest bet ever,” Domer said.

  Despite — or perhaps, because of — the court indictments stacking up against the former president, he looks almost certain to grab the Republican presidential nomination.

  So just how dumb was Domer’s bet?

  “Oh, I’m gonna lose a couple hundred thousand,” he said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    LA Dodgers show off World Series rings

  • 2

    Homeless Sudan club defy odds in CAF Champions

  • 3

    Dodgers edge Tigers and Yankees beat Brewers in opening games in the US

  • 4

    Michkov key as Flyers beat Predators

  • 5

    Trump announces 32% tariffs on Taiwan