Like many US political watchers, a Nevada resident named Domer had an opinion about who would emerge from turmoil within the Republican Party to become the next speaker of the US House of Representatives.
Unlike most of them, he made US$13,000 when Mike Johnson was finally elected last month.
That political gambling is illegal in the US has not deterred Domer (a nickname he provided) or others like him from using online overseas markets to wager on US politics.
Photo: AFP
Domer, who said he earns about US$500,000 a year betting on politics across the globe including in Italy and South Africa, is often active in chatrooms on Discord and other sites that buzz with debate among aficionados.
“There’s a lot of trash talk — it’s similar to sports betting,” he said. “It’s combative and congenial at the same time.”
Political betting was common — and legal — in the US until the rise of relatively accurate polling in the 1930s.
Futures trading regulations passed in 1936, as well as crackdowns on sports betting and the perception of gambling as seedy all helped put an end to markets that once populated Wall Street and the politics pages of newspapers.
Today, critics still worry gambling could fuel corruption or the gamification of the political system.
However, as the Internet has made gambling easier, people like Domer use virtual private networks to skirt around government regulators that have closed down sites or halted the entry of platforms that try to offer political betting to Americans.
Only two have been able to stay alive, due to their affiliations with university research projects.
The government moved last year to shut down one of them, PredictIt, alleging it had exceeded its research-focused mandate. It was granted a lifeline by a July court decision in its favor that would keep its lights on as litigation continues.
Supporters say legal markets offer benefits to the public and traders alike, and the effect is negligible as bets are capped at a few hundred dollars.
“These markets encourage attention to political events, and they serve as an antidote to fake news,” PredictIt CEO John Phillips said.
“Prediction markets are not perfect,” he said, but they are “better than polling.”
There are studies backing him up, although it is a contention that not all political scientists agree with. For better or worse, journalists stick almost exclusively with polls — which, traders say, also inform their bets.
PredictIt is currently offering shares in US President Joe Biden being a presidential nominee for US$0.68, meaning a trader who bought a share would earn US$0.32 if he is the Democratic candidate in next year’s election, which is likely.
However, bet big on California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has not even entered the race, and each share bought for US$0.23 would earn US$0.77, minus fees.
Markets also deliver insights that polls do not always capture — not just about politics, but also economics, said Tom Gruca, director of the Iowa Electronic Markets, a political betting operation run at the University of Iowa, where he also teaches.
“When you answer a poll, you tell people what you wish is going to happen,” unlike a market, which captures “what you think is going to happen,” he said.
“Even a small amount of money changes the stakes for people,” Gruca said, describing a class where, after giving students money to trade, they were “ready to rip each other limb from limb over movements of US$0.10.”
Political gambling expert Pratik Chougule also cashed in on a House speaker bet, cleaning up US$130 after Jim Jordan lost, and has most recently put about US$1,000 into Biden being the Democratic nominee.
Chougule cohosts a betting podcast, and started an advocacy group to push for legalization.
“I was a pretty true believer in the Iraq war... I had gotten that issue very wrong,” Chougule said. “I basically realized that bad prediction, bad forecasting in our policymaking is actually the norm, not the exception.”
“Having skin in the game is at least an important consideration in doing better,” he added.
For markets to work — for academic insights to be gleaned and riches to be won — there must also be losers.
“I’m currently betting a lot of money that [former US president Donald] Trump will not be the GOP [Republican] nominee — which was what I thought was a smart bet a year ago, and is now looking like the world’s dumbest bet ever,” Domer said.
Despite — or perhaps, because of — the court indictments stacking up against the former president, he looks almost certain to grab the Republican presidential nomination.
So just how dumb was Domer’s bet?
“Oh, I’m gonna lose a couple hundred thousand,” he said.
Nvidia Corp’s demand for advanced packaging from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) remains strong though the kind of technology it needs is changing, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) said yesterday, after he was asked whether the company was cutting orders. Nvidia’s most advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chip, Blackwell, consists of multiple chips glued together using a complex chip-on-wafer-on-substrate (CoWoS) advanced packaging technology offered by TSMC, Nvidia’s main contract chipmaker. “As we move into Blackwell, we will use largely CoWoS-L. Of course, we’re still manufacturing Hopper, and Hopper will use CowoS-S. We will also transition the CoWoS-S capacity to CoWos-L,” Huang said
Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) is expected to miss the inauguration of US president-elect Donald Trump on Monday, bucking a trend among high-profile US technology leaders. Huang is visiting East Asia this week, as he typically does around the time of the Lunar New Year, a person familiar with the situation said. He has never previously attended a US presidential inauguration, said the person, who asked not to be identified, because the plans have not been announced. That makes Nvidia an exception among the most valuable technology companies, most of which are sending cofounders or CEOs to the event. That includes
TARIFF TRADE-OFF: Machinery exports to China dropped after Beijing ended its tariff reductions in June, while potential new tariffs fueled ‘front-loaded’ orders to the US The nation’s machinery exports to the US amounted to US$7.19 billion last year, surpassing the US$6.86 billion to China to become the largest export destination for the local machinery industry, the Taiwan Association of Machinery Industry (TAMI, 台灣機械公會) said in a report on Jan. 10. It came as some manufacturers brought forward or “front-loaded” US-bound shipments as required by customers ahead of potential tariffs imposed by the new US administration, the association said. During his campaign, US president-elect Donald Trump threatened tariffs of as high as 60 percent on Chinese goods and 10 percent to 20 percent on imports from other countries.
INDUSTRY LEADER: TSMC aims to continue outperforming the industry’s growth and makes 2025 another strong growth year, chairman and CEO C.C. Wei says Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), a major chip supplier to Nvidia Corp and Apple Inc, yesterday said it aims to grow revenue by about 25 percent this year, driven by robust demand for artificial intelligence (AI) chips. That means TSMC would continue to outpace the foundry industry’s 10 percent annual growth this year based on the chipmaker’s estimate. The chipmaker expects revenue from AI-related chips to double this year, extending a three-fold increase last year. The growth would quicken over the next five years at a compound annual growth rate of 45 percent, fueled by strong demand for the high-performance computing
RSS