Anti-piracy authorities say they have cracked down on illegal streaming of film and TV, but data suggest it is booming, reaching 215 billion illegal site visits last year.
That figure from Britain-based MUSO, which claims the most comprehensive data on piracy Web sites, shows an 18 percent increase between 2021 and last year, covering 480,000 films and TV shows.
“It’s as easy as it ever was to get illegal content,” MUSO CEO Andy Chatterley said.
The entertainment industry is not giving up.
It recognizes that previous efforts were counter-productive. Targeting individuals with massive fines for downloading a few movies made them look like corporate bullies, while court orders to block Web sites were often a whack-a-mole waste of time.
These days, they focus on the big fish — “people buying supercars with the millions they are making out of piracy sites,” in the words of Stan McCoy, president and managing director of the region encompassing Europe, the Middle East, and Africa for the Motion Picture Association, which represents Hollywood studios.
It is a key member of the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE), formed in 2017 to coordinate anti-piracy efforts globally. It does the legwork to track down big operators and alert police.
This year, ACE has helped shut down operators in Spain, Brazil, Germany, Vietnam, Egypt and Tunisia, each with millions of monthly users.
The organization claims clear results, measured in prison sentences for operators and reduced options for users.
ACE says the number of illegal subscription services has dropped from 1,443 to 143 in the US on its watch.
However, free entertainment is still easy to find.
An inexperienced Agence France-Presse reporter took just a few minutes to Google a list of illegal streaming sites and access the latest episodes of hit shows Succession and White Lotus without any sign-up or payment.
Many are undeterred by crackdowns. The r/piracy discussion board on Reddit has 1.2 million members and every conceivable justification for their hobby, from the cost of legal streaming sites to lack of access in certain countries to vague anti-capitalist diatribes.
Some are disarmingly frank: “I don’t have any excuses. I could afford to pay for it all if I wanted, but instead of giving my money to some media company’s CEO who makes a thousand times what I do, I’d rather just save the money for my own retirement,” Reddit user ScarecrowJohnny wrote.
One factor dominates at the moment: the explosion of streaming options, with content now spread across increasingly pricey subscriptions to Netflix, Amazon.com Inc, Hulu, HBO and many more.
“I was paying for one or two, but now there’s 50 of the damn things and everything in the world costs more practically every day, so I went back to piracy,” Reddit user Jaydra wrote.
However, the watchdogs are unimpressed.
“People always find an excuse for piracy. It used to be there wasn’t enough choice — now it’s too much,” McCoy said.
Ironically, as the streaming environment fragments, MUSO’s piracy data has become one of the most accurate ways for media companies to measure which films and shows are genuinely popular. “Piracy is effectively the largest VOD [video-on-demand] platform in the world,” Chatterley said. “There is no platform bias, no cost bias, no access bias. You see what people actually want to watch.”
“We have clients who see what’s popular on piracy Web sites and then go buy it for their platform,” Chatterley said.
Since eliminating piracy is unrealistic, perhaps the most important goal for the industry is ensuring it does not become normalized.
“We’ve made a hell of a lot of progress to make it less easy,” McCoy said. “If people are dedicated to breaking the law, they will do, but it should be a marginalized activity, not mainstream.”
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process