In February 2021, Dominican baseball superstar Fernando Tatis Jr signed a monster deal with the San Diego Padres — US$340 million over 14 years.
However, up to US$30 million of that total is eventually to go to Big League Advantage (BLA), which financed Tatis in the early stages of his career, according to US media estimates.
The company and its investors stand to make at least 10 times their initial investment.
Photo: AFP
BLA is one of several start-ups offering individuals an opportunity to bankroll young athletes in exchange for a portion of their future earnings — a new and perfectly legal market that has some sports agents wringing their hands.
Investing in young athletes is nothing new. In the early 2000s, hundreds of promising soccer players ceded their rights to investment funds before the sport’s world governing body FIFA banned the practice in 2015.
Yet now, these opportunities are increasingly available to the average investor, and not just a handful of rich elites with high-powered financial advisers — thanks to new regulations that took effect in 2016.
“We started Finlete because we wanted to bridge the gap between athletes and their fans,” said Rob Connolly, cofounder of the California-based platform, which has the backing of media-telecom giant Comcast Corp.
Finlete is awaiting operations approval from the US Securities and Exchange Commission, in what would be a first for an investment firm open to all, no matter their wealth or earnings.
“Our goal is to have the share price at around US$25,” affording the investor a share of a blue-chip athlete’s future income, said Connolly, adding that he has several thousand people already on a wait list to buy in.
Shareholders would then be able to buy and sell on the platform.
Until now, this nascent investment industry has been largely linked to Major League Baseball (MLB), as its minor league system creates a market of thousands of young players who could eventually make it big.
However, Swiss company FANtium has launched with a focus on tennis, and Commonwealth, which initially specialized in shares of racehorses, is expanding its listings to include golfers.
Those players receive US$225,000 upfront to cover a three-year span, in exchange for 30 percent of their earnings over the same period — a percentage that dwindles to 10 percent in year six, when the contract expires.
The money is placed in a joint account controlled by the player and Commonwealth, “so that we have full visibility into what the money is being spent on,” Commonwealth cofounder and CEO Brian Doxtator said.
At Commonwealth, Finlete and most of their competitors, the athlete is not required to reimburse any of the initial investment if they do not make it to the professional ranks.
For the time being, for athlete investments, Commonwealth only accepts accredited investors, who fulfill a minimum wealth and income threshold.
Yet eventually, “we’ll be able to sell shares in athletes for 100 bucks” as is done for racehorses, Doxtator said.
However, one executive from a sports agency who asked not to be named, voiced skepticism about the benefits of such investments for the athletes.
“It’s become really a predatory practice,” they said. “It can be incredibly dangerous, because you can be giving away a significant financial upside long-term for sort of early short-term gains.”
The executive said he hoped to see more government regulation of the sector, with “more guardrails and safeguards.”
“But it’s still so early,” he said. “Only time will tell — I don’t think people fully understand the whole practice at large.”
Doxtator said he hopes to “completely eradicate predatory deals,” citing the example of an athlete being given US$50,000, and then owing 50 percent of his earnings to investors for 10 years.
“It’s just crazy,” he said.
Registering Commonwealth with the Securities and Exchange Commission would force transparency, especially on the financial parameters of the deals signed by the players, Doxtator said.
Connolly said he understands why some are hesitant to buy into his investment model, but added that some athletes do not have the “support system” needed to make it to the big leagues.
“A lot of these athletes have to quit their dream of being a professional athlete before they reach their full potential because of financial hardship,” Connolly said. “We believe we’re getting more [of them] the ability to achieve their dreams.”
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process