PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Australia is putting nine senior partners on leave and appointing independent directors to its board as the embattled firm seeks to claw back confidence in the wake of a tax scandal.
The company plans to ring-fence business conducted with Australia’s government to minimize conflicts of interest and boost governance, it said in a statement yesterday.
The chairs of its governance board and its designated risk committee also stepped down from their respective roles.
Photo: AP
“We are announcing these actions today, despite the fact that our investigation continues, because we recognize that our stakeholders want more transparency in order to restore confidence in our firm,” PwC Australia acting CEO Kristin Stubbins said.
PwC has been under fire following revelations that one of its former tax chiefs obtained secret information during his time working as an adviser to the government, and then leaked it to his colleagues who used it to shop tax-planning advice to global customers.
“We recognize that enhanced governance, structures and controls are necessary, and the decision to ring-fence our Federal government business is a critical next step,” Stubbins said.
Earlier this month, Ziggy Switkowski, a former telecommunications executive, was appointed to lead an independent review into the firm’s governance and culture.
Stubbins said the full report and its recommendations would be published when the review concludes in September.
PwC did not name the partners being put on leave.
Then-PwC Australia CEO Tom Seymour and two other executives stepped down earlier this year after e-mails dating from 2014 to 2017 were made public following demands from the Australian parliament, albeit with names redacted.
The nation’s police force last week opened an investigation into the matter.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was yesterday asked whether the names of all PwC partners who had access to confidential tax information should be publicly released.
“All of this should become public at the appropriate time. Of course, there are investigations under way and I don’t want to say anything to interfere with those processes, but quite clearly what went on there is completely unacceptable,” Albanese said on 2SM radio.
In a separate letter, Stubbins yesterday apologized on behalf of her firm for “betraying the trust placed in us.”
“I have worked at PwC for my whole career, and this has been personally and professionally devastating for me and my colleagues at PwC,” she said.
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process