The embattled landlord at the center of Sweden’s property crisis might look to sell the company following a plunge in the share price.
Samhallsbyggnadsbolaget i Norden AB (SBB) has initiated a strategic review that could result in “a sale of the company, business segments, or specific assets, as well as other strategic transactions,” the board of directors said in a statement.
Selling new shares is not in the scope of the review.
A sale of the company would mark a major reversal of fortunes for SBB chief executive Ilija Batljan, who in seven years built up a US$13 billion portfolio of social housing and municipal properties across the Nordic region.
“The board believes that the underlying share value in the business is significantly higher than SBB’s current market value,” Batljan said by telephone. “Because of this you have to look at the options that maximize shareholder value.”
Key to SBB’s aggressive growth had been a debt splurge that relied on cheap financing on the bond markets.
However, with bond yields — and hence borrowing costs — jumping higher, the company’s US$8 billion debt pile suddenly became unsustainable. Facing calls from investors and credit rating firms to cut leverage, the firm pledged to sell 6 billion kronor (US$554.4 million) of assets to shore up its balance sheet.
However, the efforts to conserve cash did not go far enough, which Batljan also acknowledged.
The target of 6 billion kronor “is very little in relation to a balance sheet of 160 billion kronor,” he said.
It is an assessment shared by the companies responsible for SBB’s public credit ratings. This month has seen the landlord stripped of its investment grade credit status — a vital tool to unlock cheap financing — at both S&P Global Rating and Fitch Ratings.
The move by S&P on May 8 sparked panic among investors and led to a 40 percent slump in the share price. SBB was forced to postpone its dividend and scrap plans for an emergency sale of shares to shore up liquidity.
SBB’s “current financial constraints stem from receiving forms of deferred payments for assets devolved from the group, rather than immediate cash proceeds to deleverage,” Fitch said after the market closed on Friday, having cut the landlord’s rating one step to “BB+.”
“What has led to the situation is the level where the company’s shares are traded,” Batljan said. “[SBB’s] market value deviates very strongly from the intrinsic value of our equity.”
“If we sell the entire company, we will want a very good price,” he added.
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process
RSS