The explosion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has taken the world by storm, but one question all too rarely comes up: Who can afford it?
OpenAI Inc bled about US$540 million last year as it developed ChatGPT and said it needs US$100 billion to meet its ambitions, according to industry media The Information.
“We’re going to be the most capital-intensive start-up in Silicon Valley history,” OpenAI founder Sam Altman told a panel recently.
Photo: AFP
When Microsoft Corp, which poured billions of dollars in investment into OpenAI, was asked about how much its AI adventure would cost, the company answered with assurances that it is keeping an eye on its bottom line.
Building something even near the scale of what OpenAI, Microsoft or Google have on offer would require an eye-watering investment on state-of-the-art chips and recruiting prize-winning researchers.
“People don’t realize that to do a significant amount of AI things like ChatGPT takes huge amounts of processing power. And training those models can cost tens of millions of dollars,” independent analyst Jack Gold said.
“How many companies can actually afford to go out and buy 10,000 Nvidia H100 systems that go for tens of thousands of dollars a piece?” Gold asked.
The answer is pretty much no one and in tech, if you cannot build the infrastructure, you rent it and that is what companies already do massively by outsourcing their computing needs to Microsoft, Google and Amazon Web Services.
With the advent of generative AI, this dependency on cloud computing and tech giants deepens, leaving the same players in the driver’s seat, experts said.
The unpredictable costs of cloud computing “is a heavily underestimated problem for many companies,” Software AG chief product officer Stefan Sigg said.
Sigg compared cloud costs to electricity bills and said companies that do not know better are in for “a big surprise” if they let their engineers run up bills in the mad rush to build tech, including AI.
Microsoft’s signature cloud offer is Azure and some observers believe the giant’s all-in bet on AI is really about protecting Azure success and guaranteeing the cash cow’s future.
Azure has been the giant’s unsexy bread-winner for years, bringing in huge profits, but without attracting the headlines of an iPhone or social media that go straight to the consumer.
For Microsoft, “the golden goose is monetizing cloud with Azure, because we’re talking about what could be a US$20, US$30, US$40 billion opportunity annually down the road if the AI bet is successful,” Wedbush Securities Inc analyst Dan Ives said.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that generative AI is “moving fast in the right direction.”
Deeply respected on Wall Street, Nadella would have a six or nine-month grace period to show his bet is a winner, Ives said.
Microsoft acknowledges the risk, but insists that on AI, it must “lead this wave,” chief financial officer Amy Hood told analysts this month.
“We will charge for those AI capabilities, and then ultimately, we’ll deliver operating profit,” she said.
Piling up profit at the company founded by Bill Gates can only mean passing on the cost of AI to customers. From Main Street to Fortune 500, the dependency on the AI-amped would be an expensive one, and companies and investors are drumming up alternatives to at least reduce the bill.
“AI training, GPT training will become a very important cloud service going forward,” Spectro Cloud CEO Tenry Fu said.
His company, like many others in the sector, helps companies optimize cloud technology to reduce expenses.
“But after training, a company will be able to get their model back for real AI application” and the dependence on the cloud giants will hopefully be reduced, he added.
Regulators are hoping that they can keep up and not leave the giants in charge, imposing their terms on smaller companies.
“Law enforcers [must] ensure that ... opportunities and openings for competition ... are not getting squashed out by the incumbents,” US Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Lina Khan told CNBC.
Semiconductor business between Taiwan and the US is a “win-win” model for both sides given the high level of complementarity, the government said yesterday responding to tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Home to the world’s largest contract chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), Taiwan is a key link in the global technology supply chain for companies such as Apple Inc and Nvidia Corp. Trump said on Monday he plans to impose tariffs on imported chips, pharmaceuticals and steel in an effort to get the producers to make them in the US. “Taiwan and the US semiconductor and other technology industries
SMALL AND EFFICIENT: The Chinese AI app’s initial success has spurred worries in the US that its tech giants’ massive AI spending needs re-evaluation, a market strategist said Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek’s (深度求索) eponymous AI assistant rocketed to the top of Apple Inc’s iPhone download charts, stirring doubts in Silicon Valley about the strength of the US’ technological dominance. The app’s underlying AI model is widely seen as competitive with OpenAI and Meta Platforms Inc’s latest. Its claim that it cost much less to train and develop triggered share moves across Asia’s supply chain. Chinese tech firms linked to DeepSeek, such as Iflytek Co (科大訊飛), surged yesterday, while chipmaking tool makers like Advantest Corp slumped on the potential threat to demand for Nvidia Corp’s AI accelerators. US stock
The US Federal Reserve is expected to announce a pause in rate cuts on Wednesday, as policymakers look to continue tackling inflation under close and vocal scrutiny from US President Donald Trump. The Fed cut its key lending rate by a full percentage point in the final four months of last year and indicated it would move more cautiously going forward amid an uptick in inflation away from its long-term target of 2 percent. “I think they will do nothing, and I think they should do nothing,” Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis former president Jim Bullard said. “I think the
SUBSIDIES: The nominee for commerce secretary indicated the Trump administration wants to put its stamp on the plan, but not unravel it entirely US President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the agency in charge of a US$52 billion semiconductor subsidy program declined to give it unqualified support, raising questions about the disbursement of funds to companies like Intel Corp and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電). “I can’t say that I can honor something I haven’t read,” Howard Lutnick, Trump’s nominee for commerce secretary, said of the binding CHIPS and Science Act awards in a confirmation hearing on Wednesday. “To the extent monies have been disbursed, I would commit to rigorously enforcing documents that have been signed by those companies to make sure we get
RSS