Microsoft Corp’s US$69 billion takeover bid for games developer Activision Blizzard Inc came back from the brink after the EU gave its blessing for one of the biggest deals in history.
In a decision diametrically opposed to findings by British and US antitrust authorities, EU regulators on Monday said that the transaction could actually boost competition and make the fledgling cloud-gaming market better.
While EU Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager’s team has raised hopes in Redmond, Washington, and Santa Monica, California — where Microsoft and Activision have their respective headquarters — the duo still face a formidable task convincing UK and US judges to side with them in legal challenges.
Photo: Bloomberg
The hardest fight could be in Britain, where the firms must receive a positive ruling from the specialized Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), a court with a narrow remit and a history of siding with the officials who pen the initial decisions.
Microsoft is expected to formally file its appeal with the tribunal by the end of the month.
“I struggle to see what can be done,” said Pablo Ibanez Colomo, a law professor specialized in competition at the London School of Economics and Political Science. “The standard of review in merger cases in the UK is deferential,” meaning that “the grounds on which the decision can be annulled are quite limited.”
If deference is a factor, then the CAT would be mindful of comments from British Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) chief executive Sarah Cardell, who responded to the EU’s announcement in an unusually blunt fashion, highlighting how commitments accepted by Brussels would allow “Microsoft to set the terms and conditions for this market for the next 10 years.”
“They would replace a free, open and competitive market with one subject to ongoing regulation of the games Microsoft sells, the platforms to which it sells them, and the conditions of sale,” Cardell said.
Earlier on Monday, Vestager dubbed the deal a “pro-competitive” merger that would help to “kick-start” the cloud streaming market.
She said the EU saw merits in Microsoft’s remedies offering, with her team noting how 10-year licensing deals for rival platforms represented a “significant improvement for cloud-game streaming compared to the current situation.”
Microsoft president Brad Smith praised the EU decision as empowering “millions of consumers worldwide to play these games on any device they choose.”
Activision CEO Bobby Kotick said the EU conducted a “thorough, deliberate process to gain a comprehensive understanding of gaming.”
Microsoft’s and Activision’s lawyers would use it “to provide greater ballast to their appeal of the CMA’s decision which is in the works,” said Alex Haffner, competition partner at London law firm Fladgate LLP.
When the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued to block the merger in December last year, Microsoft maintained it still had avenues for approval. The Xbox maker’s plan was to persuade UK and EU authorities to accept a global behavioral remedy, then return to negotiations with the FTC. If the US regulator refused to budge, the company wagered it could persuade a US judge that those binding global remedies resolved the competition concerns.
That strategy has suddenly become much more challenging. As it stands, the FTC trial is not set to begin until early August and is not likely to produce a decision until the end of the year.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) would not produce its most advanced technologies in the US next year, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the comment during an appearance at the legislature, hours after the chipmaker announced that it would invest an additional US$100 billion to expand its manufacturing operations in the US. Asked by Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) if TSMC would allow its most advanced technologies, the yet-to-be-released 2-nanometer and 1.6-nanometer processes, to go to the US in the near term, Kuo denied it. TSMC recently opened its first US factory, which produces 4-nanometer
GREAT SUCCESS: Republican Senator Todd Young expressed surprise at Trump’s comments and said he expects the administration to keep the program running US lawmakers who helped secure billions of dollars in subsidies for domestic semiconductor manufacturing rejected US President Donald Trump’s call to revoke the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, signaling that any repeal effort in the US Congress would fall short. US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who negotiated the law, on Wednesday said that Trump’s demand would fail, while a top Republican proponent, US Senator Todd Young, expressed surprise at the president’s comments and said he expects the administration to keep the program running. The CHIPS Act is “essential for America leading the world in tech, leading the world in AI [artificial
REACTIONS: While most analysts were positive about TSMC’s investment, one said the US expansion could disrupt the company’s supply-demand balance Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) new US$100 billion investment in the US would exert a positive effect on the chipmaker’s revenue in the medium term on the back of booming artificial intelligence (AI) chip demand from US chip designers, an International Data Corp (IDC) analyst said yesterday. “This is good for TSMC in terms of business expansion, as its major clients for advanced chips are US chip designers,” IDC senior semiconductor research manager Galen Zeng (曾冠瑋) said by telephone yesterday. “Besides, those US companies all consider supply chain resilience a business imperative,” Zeng said. That meant local supply would
Servers that might contain artificial intelligence (AI)-powering Nvidia Corp chips shipped from the US to Singapore ended up in Malaysia, but their actual final destination remains a mystery, Singaporean Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam said yesterday. The US is cracking down on exports of advanced semiconductors to China, seeking to retain a competitive edge over the technology. However, Bloomberg News reported in late January that US officials were probing whether Chinese AI firm DeepSeek (深度求索) bought advanced Nvidia semiconductors through third parties in Singapore, skirting Washington’s restrictions. Shanmugam said the route of the chips emerged in the course of an