Depending on which side you are on, tech giant Microsoft Corp is either the hero fighting to bring some of the most popular video games to more people, or the villain on the brink of killing competition in the sector.
The Xbox owner has embarked on a campaign to convince all three EU, UK and US regulators to back its US$69 billion bid to take over Activision Blizzard Inc, owner of hit games Candy Crush and Call Of Duty.
The effort to create the world’s third-largest gaming company by revenue was launched last year, but the company must now address concerns from all three regulators that if it takes control of such market-leading games it could stifle competition.
Photo: AP
Sony Group Corp, which produces the bestselling PlayStation console, says the deal would give Microsoft the power to limit rivals’ access to the popular franchise.
Microsoft has said that it would not make financial sense for it to do so.
The toughest authority to convince could be the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which in February issued preliminary findings that the takeover could harm competition and consumer choice.
The British market is smaller than that of the US or the EU, but if the CMA blocks the Activision Blizzard takeover, Microsoft would probably have to back down.
Microsoft would have to comply, since removing all of its products from British users would mean losing a huge market, Anne Witt, a professor of anti-trust law at EDHEC business school in France, told reporters.
“It is unthinkable that Microsoft would completely withdraw from the UK. It’s not only video games, it’s Windows,” Witt said, referring to Microsoft’s globally dominant PC operating system.
Witt pointed to the UK regulator’s recent decision to order Facebook owner Meta Platforms Inc to sell animated graphics start-up Giphy, ruling that the deal would harm competition.
“The CMA is the first competition agency ever to have prohibited a big tech acquisition,” Witt said.
If the CMA takes a harder line than Brussels on the Microsoft and Activision Blizzard deal, it would mark the first time since Brexit that the UK regulator has differed from the EU in such a major case.
However, deep-pocketed Microsoft could appeal to the competition appeals tribunal, where experts say it has a real chance of winning.
Microsoft appeared to get a reprieve last month when the CMA narrowed the scope of its probe to cloud gaming — agreeing with Microsoft that if the firm made Call of Duty exclusive to the Xbox console it “would be significantly loss-making.”
The CMA is expected to rule by Wednesday next week, while the EU is due to decide by May 22, so there is space for them to diverge from each other — or for either to disagree with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
“It’s possible for the UK and EU and then even the FTC, to say that it is anti-competitive,” said Eleanor Fox, a professor at New York University law school.
“And it’s possible to have divergence on what is the right remedy, whether you stop the whole thing or whether you allow Microsoft to make certain promises,” Fox said.
The case is emblematic of regulators’ newly focused attitude toward big tech companies, and Witt said the British regulator seems to be taking on a leadership role among its peers.
The European Commission is expected to be an easier hurdle than Britain.
During Microsoft executive Brad Smith’s visit to Brussels, he appeared confident the EU would rubber stamp the acquisition after the company showed evidence of its deals with cloud gaming service providers.
Microsoft argues that these would give 150 million more people access to games like Call of Duty.
When an apartment comes up for rent in Germany’s big cities, hundreds of prospective tenants often queue down the street to view it, but the acute shortage of affordable housing is getting scant attention ahead of today’s snap general election. “Housing is one of the main problems for people, but nobody talks about it, nobody takes it seriously,” said Andreas Ibel, president of Build Europe, an association representing housing developers. Migration and the sluggish economy top the list of voters’ concerns, but analysts say housing policy fails to break through as returns on investment take time to register, making the
‘SILVER LINING’: Although the news caused TSMC to fall on the local market, an analyst said that as tariffs are not set to go into effect until April, there is still time for negotiations US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said that he would likely impose tariffs on semiconductor, automobile and pharmaceutical imports of about 25 percent, with an announcement coming as soon as April 2 in a move that would represent a dramatic widening of the US leader’s trade war. “I probably will tell you that on April 2, but it’ll be in the neighborhood of 25 percent,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago club when asked about his plan for auto tariffs. Asked about similar levies on pharmaceutical drugs and semiconductors, the president said that “it’ll be 25 percent and higher, and it’ll
NOT TO WORRY: Some people are concerned funds might continue moving out of the country, but the central bank said financial account outflows are not unusual in Taiwan Taiwan’s outbound investments hit a new high last year due to investments made by contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and other major manufacturers to boost global expansion, the central bank said on Thursday. The net increase in outbound investments last year reached a record US$21.05 billion, while the net increase in outbound investments by Taiwanese residents reached a record US$31.98 billion, central bank data showed. Chen Fei-wen (陳斐紋), deputy director of the central bank’s Department of Economic Research, said the increase was largely due to TSMC’s efforts to expand production in the US and Japan. Investments by Vanguard International
WARNING SHOT: The US president has threatened to impose 25 percent tariffs on all imported vehicles, and similar or higher duties on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors US President Donald Trump on Wednesday suggested that a trade deal with China was “possible” — a key target in the US leader’s tariffs policy. The US in 2020 had already agreed to “a great trade deal with China” and a new deal was “possible,” Trump said. Trump said he expected Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to visit the US, without giving a timeline for his trip. Trump also said that he was talking to China about TikTok, as the US seeks to broker a sale of the popular app owned by Chinese firm ByteDance Ltd (字節跳動). Trump last week said that he had
RSS