Apple Inc assembled more than US$7 billion of iPhones in India last fiscal year, tripling production in the world’s fastest-growing smartphone arena after accelerating its move beyond China.
The US company now makes almost 7 percent of its iPhones in India through expanding partners from Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) to Pegatron Corp (和碩), people familiar with the matter said.
That is a significant leap for India, which accounted for an estimated 1 percent of the world’s iPhones in 2021.
Photo: Bloomberg
Apple is exploring ways to reduce its reliance on China as tensions between Washington and Beijing continue to escalate.
Its longtime partners, who make most of the world’s iPhones in sprawling factories in China, have added assembly lines in other countries at a rapid pace over the past year, the people said on the condition of anonymity.
The world’s most valuable company struggled last year with chaos at Foxconn’s main “iPhone City” complex in Zhengzhou, which drove home vulnerabilities in Apple’s supply chain and forced it to cut output estimates.
Of the total production, Apple exported US$5 billion of iPhones in the fiscal year ended last month, nearly four times as much as the previous period, the people said.
Apple is likely to manufacture the next iPhones in India at the same time as in China, sometime in the fall of this year. If so, that would be the first time that iPhone assembly begins concurrently in the two countries.
If the aggressive expansion of its suppliers continues, Apple could assemble one-quarter of all its iPhones in India by 2025.
Even before last year’s iPhone City difficulty, Apple had recognized the need to diversify its supply chain. It successfully lobbied for incentives in India and pushed suppliers Foxconn, Pegatron and Wistron Corp (緯創) to ramp up locally. The trio, which together employ about 60,000 workers in India, make models ranging from the aging iPhone 11 to the latest iPhone 14.
That has helped place Apple at the heart of India’s ambitions to become a major manufacturing alternative to China.
Apple is among the world’s most exacting when it comes to manufacturing. Its production chain encompasses hundreds of companies across the world and employs millions, much of that now in China.
The migration of iPhone production represents an economic triumph for India that could have implications for how other US brands plan their futures. For Apple, the country itself represents a fount of future growth as the Chinese economy sputters.
Apple is scheduled to open its first two retail stores in India next week, one in the financial hub of Mumbai and another in the capital New Delhi.
Apple CEO Tim Cook is scheduled to fly in to inaugurate the two stores, underscoring the domestic market’s rising importance.
Apple has also sought changes in India’s labor laws as part of its effort to expand local production and create mega factories.
Its largest contract manufacturer, Foxconn, plans to invest about US$700 million in a southern state to make phone components and possibly iPhones.
The tech industry’s reliance on China could be reduced by 20 to 40 percent by 2030, Bloomberg analysts said, adding that it could take years of investment to untangle from China’s complex, efficient and skilled supply chain.
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process