An amateur photographer who goes by the name “ibreakphotos” decided to do an experiment on his Samsung smartphone last month to find out how a feature called “space zoom” actually works.
The feature, first released in 2020, claims a 100x zoom rate, and Samsung Electronics Co used sparkling clear images of the moon in its marketing.
Ibreakphotos took his own pictures of the moon — blurry and without detail — and watched as his phone added craters and other details.
Photo: AFP / Jos Avery
The phone’s artificial intelligence (AI) software was using data from its “training” on many other pictures of the moon to add detail where there was none.
“The moon pictures from Samsung are fake,” he wrote, leading many to wonder whether the shots people take are really theirs anymore — or if they can even be described as photographs.
Samsung has defended the technology, saying it does not “overlay” images, and pointed out that users can switch off the function.
The firm is not alone in the race to pack its smartphone cameras with AI — Google’s Pixel devices and Apple Inc’s iPhone have been marketing such features since 2016.
The AI can do all the things photographers used to labor over — tweaking the lighting, blurring backgrounds, sharpening eyes — without the user ever knowing.
However, it can also transform backgrounds or simply wipe away people from the image entirely.
The debate over AI is not limited to hobbyists on message boards — professional bodies are raising the alarm too.
The industry is awash with AI, from cameras to software like Photoshop, said Michael Pritchard, director of education and public affairs at the Royal Photographic Society of Britain.
“This automation is increasingly blurring boundaries between a photograph and a piece of artwork,” he said.
The nature of AI is different to previous innovations, because the technology can learn and bring new elements beyond those recorded by film or sensor, he said.
This brings opportunities, but also “fundamental challenges around redefining what photography is, and how ‘real’ a photograph is,” Pritchard said.
Nick Dunmur of the Britain-based Association of Photographers said professionals most often use “RAW” files on their digital cameras, which capture images with as little processing as possible.
However, sidestepping the technology is less easy for a casual smartphone shooter.
Ibreakphotos, who posted his finding on Reddit, said that technical jargon around AI is not always easy to understand — perhaps deliberately so.
“I wouldn’t say that I am happy with the use of AI in cameras, but I am OK with it as long as it is communicated clearly what each processing pipeline actually does,” he told reporters, asking not to use his real name.
What professional photographers are most concerned about, though, is the rise of AI tools that generate completely new images.
In the past year, DALL-E 2, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion have exploded in popularity thanks to their ability to create images in hundreds of styles with just a short text prompt.
“This is not human-authored work,” Dunmur said. “And in many cases is based on the use of training datasets of unlicensed work.”
These issues have already led to court cases in the US and Europe.
According to Pritchard, the tools risk disrupting the work of anyone “from photographers, to models, to retouchers and art directors.”
However, Jos Avery, a US amateur photographer who recently tricked thousands on Instagram by filling his feed with stunning portraits he had created with Midjourney, disagreed.
He said the lines drawn between “our work” and “the tool’s work” were arbitrary, pointing out that his Midjourney images often took many hours to create.
However, there is broad agreement on one fundamental aspect of the debate — the risk for photography is not existential.
“AI will not be the death of photography,” Avery said.
Pritchard agreed, saying that photography had endured from the daguerreotype to the digital era, and photographers had always risen to technical challenges.
That process would continue even in a world awash with AI-generated images, he said.
“The photographer will bring a deeper understanding to the resulting image even if they haven’t directly photographed it,” he said.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday obtained the government’s approval to inject an additional US$7.5 billion into its US subsidiary, the Department of Investment Review said in a statement. The department approved TSMC’s application of investing in TSMC Arizona Corp, which is engaged in the manufacturing, sales, testing and design of IC and other semiconductor devices, it said. The latest capital injection follows a US$5 billion investment for TSMC Arizona approved in June. The chipmaker has broken ground on two advanced fabs in Arizona with aggregated investments approved by the department totaling US$24 billion thus far. According to TSMC, the first Arizona
The lethal hack of Hezbollah’s Asian-branded pagers and walkie-talkies has sparked an intense search for the devices’ path, revealing a murky market for older technologies where buyers might have few assurances about what they are getting. While supply chains and distribution channels for higher-margin and newer products are tightly managed, that is not the case for older electronics from Asia where counterfeiting, surplus inventories and complex contract manufacturing deals can sometimes make it impossible to identify the source of a product, analysts and consultants say. The response from the companies at the center of the booby-trapped gadgets that killed 37
FRIENDLY TAKEOVER: While Qualcomm Inc’s proposal to buy some or all of Intel raises the prospect of other competitors, Broadcom Inc is staying on the sidelines Qualcomm Inc has approached Intel Corp to discuss a potential acquisition of the struggling chipmaker, people with knowledge of the matter said, raising the prospect of one of the biggest-ever merger and acquisition deals. California-based Qualcomm proposed a friendly takeover for Intel in recent days, said the sources, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information. The proposal is for all of the chipmaker, although Qualcomm has not ruled out buying some parts of Intel and selling off others. It is uncertain whether the initial approach would lead to an agreement and any deal is likely to come under close antitrust scrutiny
SECURITY CONCERNS: The proposed ban on Chinese autonomous vehicle software and hardware would go into effect with the 2027 and 2030 model years respectively The US Department of Commerce today is expected to propose prohibiting Chinese software and hardware in connected and autonomous vehicles on US roads due to national security concerns, two sources said. US President Joe Biden’s administration has raised concerns about the collection of data by Chinese companies on US drivers and infrastructure as well as the potential foreign manipulation of vehicles connected to the Internet and navigation systems. The proposed regulation would ban the import and sale of vehicles from China with key communications or automated driving system software or hardware, said the two sources, who declined to be identified because the