The world’s chocolate industry could be in for a turbulent ride as the two biggest cocoa producers set down demands for manufacturers to pay higher prices for their growers.
The quarrel focuses on the Living Income Differential — a policy that Ivory Coast and Ghana introduced in 2019 to fight poverty among cocoa farmers in the global US$130 billion chocolate market.
Under it, Ivory Coast and Ghana vowed to charge a premium of US$400 per tonne on all cocoa sales, starting with the 2020-2021 harvest.
Photo: AFP
However, trade boards in the countries — the Ivorian Coffee-Cocoa Council (CCC) and the Ghana Cocoa Board (Cocobod) — say the scheme is being undermined as cocoa traders depress the price of another premium that operates in parallel.
“We’ve introduced the Living Income Differential as a means of improving the farmer income,” Cocobod spokesperson Fiifi Boafo said. “You have these companies circumventing these processes to ensure that the Living Income Differential effect is not felt in [their] lives.”
The two countries together account for 60 percent of the world’s cocoa, but their farmers earn less than 6 percent of the industry’s global revenue.
They boycotted a bridge-building meeting in Brussels late last month and set today as a deadline for bringing buyers into line.
They are threatening to punish corporations by barring them from visiting plantations to estimate harvests — a key factor in cocoa price forecasting, and are also threatening to suspend sustainability programs that chocolate giants use to enhance their image with fast-growing ethnic consumers.
“This boycott and also ultimatum is to draw attention to the fact that inasmuch as it is important for us to talk about deforestation, it is important to talk about child labor, it is equally important to talk about the farmer income,” Boafo said.
The Living Income Differential premium is being completed by a price stabilization fund to help buffer the international price of cocoa in the event of big market fluctuations.
Some experts say the chocolate giants have factored the Living Income Differential into their costs but claw back some of this by exerting pressure on another premium based on the quality of cocoa beans.
This premium, known as the origin differential, has plunged below zero in recent years, effectively canceling out part of the Living Income Differential.
COVID-19 is being used as “a pretext not to pay,” CCC president Yves Brahima Kone said. “The thing is, the multinationals have increased their profits — they are able to pay.”
The World Cocoa Foundation, an umbrella group of public entities and corporations aimed at supporting sustainability in the sector, declined to comment on the face-off.
Among corporations, Nestle said it strongly backed efforts for growers to maintain a decent standard of living and had been paying the Living Income Differential since its inception.
Some experts say that time might weigh against Ivory Coast and Ghana if the row escalates.
Virtually all of Ivory Coast’s crop is purchased by roughly half a dozen majors. Of this, about 80 percent heads to Europe, the wealthy market where sustainability factors — environmental and labor criteria — count most for consumers.
“Ivory Coast’s economy is heavily dependent on cocoa income,” one specialist said. “It needs to sell its beans.”
“Stopping sustainability programs is difficult to explain to the general public, and Ivory Coast’s image could [also] suffer,” they said.
Other commodities:
Gold for December delivery fell US$8.60 to US$1,754.40 an ounce, declining 0.85 percent from a week earlier.
Silver for December delivery rose US$0.02 to US$21 an ounce, but lost 3.09 percent on the week, while December copper fell US$0.06 to US$3.63 a pound, down 7.16 percent weekly.
Additional reporting by AP
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process
RSS