Autonomous vehicle companies and suppliers have collectively spent about US$75 billion developing self-driving technology, with scant sign of meaningful revenue emerging from robo-car services after all that cash incineration.
This has spelled disaster for Aurora Innovation Inc, TuSimple Holdings Inc and Embark Technology inc, whose shares have each plunged at least 80 percent this year.
It is no wonder that Intel Corp just slashed the targeted valuation for its autonomous-driving business Mobileye to about US$16 billion, a fraction of the more than US$50 billion it reportedly had in mind 10 months ago.
Photo: Reuters
Cruise LLC, owned by General Motors Co (GM), raised money at a roughly US$30 billion valuation early last year. In March, GM bought out SoftBank Vision Fund at a price implying the venture was worth about US$19 billion.
This is what happens when long-gestating new technology meets the short patience of public markets and harsh reality of rising interest rates. Many of these companies raised tens of billions of dollars long before their technology was proven or their businesses came close to being self-sustaining.
The hype of the past decade or so and crash of late is calling into question whether self-driving vehicles will ever work.
Anthony Levandowski, one of Google’s early autonomy pioneers, who left for Uber Technologies Inc and was later convicted of stealing trade secrets, is the cofounder and chief executive of Pronto, a start-up developing autonomous trucks for industrial sites.
In a Businessweek cover story this month, he said that less-complex use cases would be the way forward for the foreseeable future.
Adam Jonas, head of global auto and shared mobility research at Morgan Stanley, seven years ago ascribed massive value to a Tesla Inc mobility service that is still nowhere to be found.
He said in recent a note that autonomy could be a 10 or 20-year proposition.
Companies in the space are now being forced to contemplate drastic measures. Aurora chief executive Chris Urmson last month sent out an internal memo raising the prospect of cost cuts, taking the company private, spinning off assets or even trying to sell the company to Apple Inc or Microsoft Corp.
Others have seen high-level turnover. GM chief executive Mary Barra dismissed Cruise counterpart Dan Ammann late last year. TuSimple replaced founder and chief executive Lu Cheng (呂程) in March, and its general counsel James Mullen resigned last month. Alphabet-owned Waymo LLC lost its chief product officer Dan Chu last month to 23andMe Holding Co.
While executives and investors alike are in some cases heading for the exits, well-capitalized companies in the space are plowing ahead into new markets and projects. Cruise plans to replicate its San Francisco robo-taxi service in Phoenix and Austin, Texas. Waymo is to start offering rides in Los Angeles and also has been hauling beer between Dallas and Houston.
Start-up Kodiak Robotics raised US$30 million in private capital this week and ran its freight trucks 12,875km from Texas to Florida.
While there was a test driver at the wheel, the human ceded to the robot 94 percent of the time, Kodiak chief executive and founder Don Burnette said. The company is starting to haul furniture for Ikea.
Asked if Kodiak would be ready to ditch the safety driver anytime soon, Burnette said: “We’re pretty close. It seems like we always say this. It’s a couple years out.”
It might take even longer, but the market getting the timing of autonomy wrong does not mean it will never work. The lesson is that technology as radical as robotic driving was always better off in the incubators of daring venture capitalists, not the portfolios of trigger-happy stock traders.
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process
RSS