Visit a mid-sized store in an Indian city, and you would wonder if it exists to make any money. It might just as well be there to process transactions for half-a-dozen payment apps: PhonePe, Paytm, Google Pay, BharatPe, Amazon Pay and MobiKwik. Add up the merchants who have downloaded the digital services and the figure quickly reaches 80 million.
One-third of India’s 60 million-plus small businesses are using an average of four different platforms, said Raman Khanduja, chief executive officer of Mintoak, a Mumbai-based fintech.
“The neighborhood shopkeepers’ bandwidth is getting sucked into accepting money,” he says. “When do they run their business?”
There are several juggling acts going on, apart from the millions of owners of small businesses reconciling their accounts across the many services that have sprung up as an alternative to cash and plastic.
The payment apps do not make any money out of this activity because they all run on a shared public utility. What they get is data that they can analyze to predict the creditworthiness of the small shops.
It is the banks that ultimately issue loans to these “thin-file” customers, but fintech controls the flow of information — and gets remunerated by the lenders for finding creditworthy merchants.
BANK QUESTION
Why have the banks let fintech get between them and all these potential clients?
Historically, depository institutions in emerging markets such as India did not see much business in democratizing cashless payments. Card readers were costly pieces of hardware and could only be deployed at shops that were well-established. These point-of-sale devices were also dumb: Even when the lenders got data about a store that was swiping a lot of cards issued by them, to advance money to a retailer based on that knowledge required multiple sales calls. It was not worth the trouble then, and makes even less sense now that India’s digital revolution has put plastic in the shade.
Credit and debit cards get swiped in two out of 10 transactions — usually for higher-value purchases and at bigger retailers.
Banks also fell behind in embracing payments on smartphones.
They do not have a tech DNA and the weight of their legacy infrastructure made their own online products clunky.
Fintech, which was far nimbler and more willing to shower generous cash-backs at early adopters, jumped on the opportunity created by India’s six-year-old Unified Payments Interface. Using this highly popular, open-source protocol, mobile apps in India move funds in real time — using phone numbers for person-to-person transfers and QR codes to settle shopping bills.
POPULAR METHOD
Nearly 2 billion such merchant transactions got done in February. The Indian government mandates that all Unified Payments Interface transactions be free of charge.
You would think that the apps, looking for ways to make money from payments, would attack the banks’ deposit-taking franchise, then. They are, actually. BharatPe part-owns a bank and is thus in a position to lure retailers to switch their current accounts. Similarly, Alphabet Inc’s Google Pay, the second most popular consumer wallet in India after Walmart Inc-owned PhonePe, is using its sway to promote fixed deposits.
WHAT’S THE POINT?
If lenders lose control of demand and time deposits, what is even the point of having a banking license?
Lending in a digital world is proving to be equally problematic. Banks are not intuitively geared to handle the unique requirements of small businesses. Suppose the salesperson for Unilever PLC’s local unit shows up at a store and says: “Since I have to meet my quarterly target, you can have another 5 percent discount if you pay upfront.”
Traditional lenders’ internal processes are too slow to clear an immediate loan like that. What is needed are pre-approved credit limits based on the borrower’s digital cash flows and innovative products such as buy-now, pay-later — but for retailers.
This is what banks have been missing out on.
Now they want to reclaim the lost ground, but can they?
Perhaps.
They would have to come in as consolidators, leveraging the trust advantage they still have over fintech, which is hobbled by its own ubiquity. Because there are already so many apps on an average shopkeeper’s phone, each service obtains only a fragment of actual sales.
WHITE-LABEL PLATFORM
“Nobody is getting enough data to offer meaningful financial services,” Khanduja says.
That is why the former Visa Inc executive, together with a couple of his colleagues, came up with the idea of Mintoak, a white-label merchant-payment platform for banks that can accept all digital payments, as well as cash and cards.
It produces a single report, leaving retailers free to run their business.
Mintoak, which works with HDFC Bank Ltd and State Bank of India, two of India’s largest lenders, earns a subscription fee and gets a cut on products that banks sell on the platform.
HDFC Bank owns 5.2 percent of the start-up.
EMERGING MARKETS
India’s success in digital finance has inspired many emerging markets to design payments along similar lines, giving Mintoak a foothold in the Middle East and the prospect of its first client in Africa.
“We want to reconnect banks with SMEs [small and medium-sized enterprises],” Khanduja says.
Payments are not the only way to tap small businesses. A vast chunk of the working capital that retailers need is embedded in the inventory. This credit used to reach them informally via distributors of brands, but it is increasingly being provided by e-commerce platforms such as venture capital-backed Udaan and billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s JioMart app for neighborhood stores.
STANDARD CHARTERED
UK-based Standard Chartered PLC has made an attempt to get into India’s business-to-business e-commerce with the hope of replicating the model in Kenya and other emerging markets.
However, most other banks would rather stick to what they know.
Luckily for them, none of the existing merchant-payment apps still has the revenue heft of a Block Inc — formerly Square Inc — in the US.
Before a dominant player emerges in the fragmented market, India’s banks need to find their way back to the cash counter.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services.
CHIP WAR: Tariffs on Taiwanese chips would prompt companies to move their factories, but not necessarily to the US, unleashing a ‘global cross-sector tariff war’ US President Donald Trump would “shoot himself in the foot” if he follows through on his recent pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese and other foreign semiconductors entering the US, analysts said. Trump’s plans to raise tariffs on chips manufactured in Taiwan to as high as 100 percent would backfire, macroeconomist Henry Wu (吳嘉隆) said. He would “shoot himself in the foot,” Wu said on Saturday, as such economic measures would lead Taiwanese chip suppliers to pass on additional costs to their US clients and consumers, and ultimately cause another wave of inflation. Trump has claimed that Taiwan took up to
A start-up in Mexico is trying to help get a handle on one coastal city’s plastic waste problem by converting it into gasoline, diesel and other fuels. With less than 10 percent of the world’s plastics being recycled, Petgas’ idea is that rather than letting discarded plastic become waste, it can become productive again as fuel. Petgas developed a machine in the port city of Boca del Rio that uses pyrolysis, a thermodynamic process that heats plastics in the absence of oxygen, breaking it down to produce gasoline, diesel, kerosene, paraffin and coke. Petgas chief technology officer Carlos Parraguirre Diaz said that in
Japan intends to closely monitor the impact on its currency of US President Donald Trump’s new tariffs and is worried about the international fallout from the trade imposts, Japanese Minister of Finance Katsunobu Kato said. “We need to carefully see how the exchange rate and other factors will be affected and what form US monetary policy will take in the future,” Kato said yesterday in an interview with Fuji Television. Japan is very concerned about how the tariffs might impact the global economy, he added. Kato spoke as nations and firms brace for potential repercussions after Trump unleashed the first salvo of
SUPPORT: The government said it would help firms deal with supply disruptions, after Trump signed orders imposing tariffs of 25 percent on imports from Canada and Mexico The government pledged to help companies with operations in Mexico, such as iPhone assembler Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), shift production lines and investment if needed to deal with higher US tariffs. The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday announced measures to help local firms cope with the US tariff increases on Canada, Mexico, China and other potential areas. The ministry said that it would establish an investment and trade service center in the US to help Taiwanese firms assess the investment environment in different US states, plan supply chain relocation strategies and
RSS