US platform operator Cent, which sold a non-fungible token (NFT) of former Twitter Inc CEO Jack Dorsey’s first tweet for US$2.9 million, has halted most transactions because people were selling tokens of content that did not belong to them, its founder said, calling this a “fundamental problem” in the fast-growing digital assets market.
NFT sales soared to about US$25 billion last year, leaving many baffled as to why so much money is being spent on items that do not physically exist and which anyone can view online for free.
NFTs are crypto assets that record the ownership of a digital file such as an image, video or text. Anyone can create, or “mint,” an NFT, and ownership of the token does not usually confer ownership of the underlying item.
Photo: Bloomberg
Reports of scams and counterfeits have become commonplace.
Cent executed one of the first known million-dollar NFT sales when it sold Dorsey’s tweet as an NFT in March last year.
However, the platform on Feb. 6 stopped allowing buying and selling, Cent CEO and cofounder Cameron Hejazi told Reuters.
“There’s a spectrum of activity that is happening that basically shouldn’t be happening — like, legally,” Hejazi said.
While Cent’s marketplace, beta.cent.co, has paused NFT sales, the part specifically for selling NFTs of Twitter posts, which it calls “Valuables,” is still active.
Hejazi said there were three main problems: people selling unauthorized copies of other NFTs, people making NFTs of content that does not belong to them, and people selling sets of NFTs that resemble a security.
These issues were “rampant,” with users “minting and minting and minting counterfeit digital assets,” he said.
“It kept happening. We would ban offending accounts, but it was like we’re playing a game of whack-a-mole,” he said. “Every time we would ban one, another one would come up, or three more would come up.”
Such problems might come into greater focus as major brands join the rush toward the so-called “metaverse,” or Web3.
Coca-Cola Co and luxury brand Gucci are among companies to have sold NFTs, while YouTube said it would explore NFT features.
While Cent, with 150,000 users and revenue “in the millions,” is a relatively small NFT platform, Hejazi said the issue of fake and illegal content exists across the industry.
“I think this is a pretty fundamental problem with Web3,” he said.
The biggest NFT marketplace — OpenSea, valued at US$13.3 billion after its latest round of venture funding — last month said that more than 80 percent of the NFTs minted for free on its platform were “plagiarized works, fake collections and spam.”
OpenSea tried limiting the number of NFTs a user could mint for free, but then reversed the decision following a backlash from users, the company wrote on Twitter, adding that it was “working through a number of solutions” to deter “bad actors” while supporting creators.
“It is against our policy to sell NFTs using plagiarized content,” an OpenSea spokesperson said. “We are working around the clock to ship products, add features and refine our processes to meet the moment.”
To many NFT-enthusiasts, the decentralized nature of blockchain technology is appealing, allowing users to create and trade digital assets without a central authority controlling the activity.
However, Hejazi said that his company was keen on protecting content creators and might introduce centralized controls as a short-term measure to reopen the marketplace, before exploring decentralized solutions.
It was after the Dorsey NFT sale that Cent started to get a sense of what was going on in NFT markets, the spokesperson said, adding: “We realized that a lot of it is just money chasing money.”
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process
RSS