Sonos Inc won a US trade agency ruling that limits the imports of some phones, laptops and speakers made overseas by Alphabet Inc’s Google because they infringe on patents for home audio technology.
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) issued the ban after affirming a judge’s findings that the devices were using Sonos’ patented inventions without permission. The US can veto the exclusion order on public-policy grounds, although that rarely happens. Otherwise, the ban takes effect in 60 days.
Sonos’ victory is the first time Google has faced an import ban at the trade agency. Last year, it fended off a case brought by closely held EcoFactor Inc involving smart thermostats.
The real-world impact has been hotly debated by both companies. The ITC judge had cleared changes Google made to its software to work around the patented inventions.
While Google has said that means none of its hardware can be halted at the US border, Sonos maintains that the products can still be kept from entering the country unless Google removes or degrades key audio features.
In its complaint with the agency filed two years ago, Sonos alleged that Google learned of Sonos’ technology under the guise of a working partnership to integrate Google Play Music into Sonos’ products, but instead used the patented ideas in its Home and Chromecast systems and Pixel phones and laptops. Google has filed its own claims in district court accusing Sonos of trying to take credit for work owned by Google.
Investors have been watching the ITC case closely, looking for hints that Sonos would use its patents to maintain its market share and generate revenue from patent royalties. Since the litigation began, Sonos has said that it is looking for an agreement in which Google would pay for using the technology.
Sonos said in a filing last month that while some software code changes might have been cleared by the judge, Google has not implemented those changes into any actual products. It said Google should be required to present those arguments to US Customs officials after the import ban takes effect.
Google’s gadget sales are a small fraction of its business, and the company does not disclose revenue from devices. However, Google has continued to invest in phones and home speakers as a strategy to fortify its search-and-media services against threats from Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc.
Google told the commission that no import ban should be imposed at all. The case involves Google products with sound systems such as the Nest Hub, Nest WiFi point, Pixel smartphones and Pixelbook laptops.
“Sonos chose to assert narrow software patents covering only very minor and specific audio playback features, against an extensive array of Google products that each contain thousands of times more features than what is accused,” Google said in the filing. “Sonos’ business interests in asserting these limited patents against Google’s household products do not justify the harm to the public.”
Two of the five patents involve techniques to synchronize audio playback, thereby eliminating minor differences that the ear could interpret as echoes. The others involve ways to pair up speakers to create stereo sounds, adjusting volumes of either single or groups of speakers with a single controller, and a way to easily connect the system to a home’s Wi-Fi. Three of the patents expire in 2024, while a fourth expires in 2024 and a fifth in 2027.
GROWING OWINGS: While Luxembourg and China swapped the top three spots, the US continued to be the largest exposure for Taiwan for the 41st consecutive quarter The US remained the largest debtor nation to Taiwan’s banking sector for the 41st consecutive quarter at the end of September, after local banks’ exposure to the US market rose more than 2 percent from three months earlier, the central bank said. Exposure to the US increased to US$198.896 billion, up US$4.026 billion, or 2.07 percent, from US$194.87 billion in the previous quarter, data released by the central bank showed on Friday. Of the increase, about US$1.4 billion came from banks’ investments in securitized products and interbank loans in the US, while another US$2.6 billion stemmed from trust assets, including mutual funds,
Micron Memory Taiwan Co (台灣美光), a subsidiary of US memorychip maker Micron Technology Inc, has been granted a NT$4.7 billion (US$149.5 million) subsidy under the Ministry of Economic Affairs A+ Corporate Innovation and R&D Enhancement program, the ministry said yesterday. The US memorychip maker’s program aims to back the development of high-performance and high-bandwidth memory chips with a total budget of NT$11.75 billion, the ministry said. Aside from the government funding, Micron is to inject the remaining investment of NT$7.06 billion as the company applied to participate the government’s Global Innovation Partnership Program to deepen technology cooperation, a ministry official told the
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s leading advanced chipmaker, officially began volume production of its 2-nanometer chips in the fourth quarter of this year, according to a recent update on the company’s Web site. The low-key announcement confirms that TSMC, the go-to chipmaker for artificial intelligence (AI) hardware providers Nvidia Corp and iPhone maker Apple Inc, met its original roadmap for the next-generation technology. Production is currently centered at Fab 22 in Kaohsiung, utilizing the company’s first-generation nanosheet transistor technology. The new architecture achieves “full-node strides in performance and power consumption,” TSMC said. The company described the 2nm process as
Even as the US is embarked on a bitter rivalry with China over the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), Chinese technology is quietly making inroads into the US market. Despite considerable geopolitical tensions, Chinese open-source AI models are winning over a growing number of programmers and companies in the US. These are different from the closed generative AI models that have become household names — ChatGPT-maker OpenAI or Google’s Gemini — whose inner workings are fiercely protected. In contrast, “open” models offered by many Chinese rivals, from Alibaba (阿里巴巴) to DeepSeek (深度求索), allow programmers to customize parts of the software to suit their
RSS