Sun, Dec 19, 2021 page12

• Estonia’s wood pellet industry stokes controversy

  Producers of wood pellets say they only use wood that has been rejected by sawmills or plywood factories, but environmentalists say that biomass demand is causing logging to intensify, threatening some bird species

  • By Polina Kalantar / AFP, IMAVERE, Estonia
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Estonia’s thriving wood pellet industry is pitting environmentalists who say it increases logging and harms biodiversity against supporters who say it makes good use of wood that would otherwise go to waste.

  The subject is particularly sensitive in the tiny Baltic state once ruled by Moscow, whose forests cover more than half its surface area and are very much part of the national identity.

  However, at a plant belonging to Europe’s biggest wood pellet producer, Estonia’s AS Graanul Invest, Mihkel Jugaste, the company’s head of quality and certification systems, defended the industry.

  

  A logging machine grabs a tree trunk in a forest near Kernu, Estonia, on Oct. 27. Environmentalists say that the wood pellet industry has caused an increase in forest logging, but supporters of the sector say it is making efficient use of low-quality wood.

  Photo: AFP

  “Wood only comes to us when sawmill or plywood factories reject it,” Jugaste said over the sounds of machinery turning logs into sawdust and compacting them into pellets.

  Wood pellets are a type of biofuel that can be used in special pellet stoves or central heating furnaces for homes.

  They are also used on a larger scale.

  

  Forest owner Taavi Ehrpais, head of forest management organization Vardi Metsauhistu, talks in a forest near Kernu, Estonia, on Oct. 27.

  Photo: AFP

  The former coal-fired power station of Drax in the UK now runs partially on wood pellets, including some from Estonia.

  Environmentalists say biomass demand in western Europe is causing an intensification of logging in places such as Estonia, including in protected areas, and the use of techniques such as clearcutting in which entire areas of forest are destroyed.

  They say that bird species such as the black grouse and woodlark are under threat from the logging, with woodland bird numbers falling by about one-quarter over the past two decades.

  

  A man holds wood pellets at a plant belonging to AS Graanul Invest in Imavere, Estonia, on Oct. 27.

  Photo: AFP

  Their warnings have been heard in Brussels, and the European Commission earlier this year initiated infringement proceedings against Estonia for failing to ensure environmental impact assessments before issuing logging permits in these areas.

  “The intensity of Estonian forest management is too high and pellet production within the forestry industry plays an important role,” said Siim Kuresoo, forest program coordinator at the Estonian Fund for Nature.

  “The initial idea of allowing wood to be burned as renewable energy was only to lessen the waste of the industry. Now it has grown into a big industry by itself,” Kuresoo said.

  Wood and wood product exports make up about 10 percent of Estonia’s total, and the value rose by 48 percent to 165 million euros (US$185.46 million) for the 12 months through August compared with a year earlier, official figures showed.

  Graanul has also reported that its revenues last year rose to 438.9 million euros from 401.7 million euros in 2019.

  Jugaste said his company respects and would continue to abide by any environmental protection regulation, but added that sometimes stakeholders disagree on what the rules should be.

  “We, as a wood processor, cannot really decide for them,” he said.

  “As long as experts make a decision about the protection status or the protection territory and that list is given to us, then we can protect it 100 percent,” he said.

  An article in Nature Research last year found that there had been an 85 percent increase in logged areas in Estonia from 2016 to 2018 compared with 2004 to 2015 — one of the largest expansions in the EU.

  At the same time, thanks to natural reforestation and planting, the overall forested area in Estonia last year increased to 2.3 million hectares from 2.2 million hectares in 2001.

  The issue in Estonia is part of a wider European debate over whether wood pellets can be considered a carbon-neutral energy source as long as there is replanting of trees.

  Many say they cannot because burning wood is as dirty as coal and trees take many years to grow back.

  Taavi Ehrpais, a forest owner in northwest Estonia, said only about 10 percent of his timber — the lowest quality pieces — would end up in a pellet factory.

  Ehrpais, who is also the head of Vardi Metsauhistu, a forest management organization, said it was “an unbelievable myth” that the wood pellet industry was leading to an increase in logging.

  Ehrpais also defended logging laws, saying they are “very strict” and guarantee biodiversity.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bukele proposes prisoner swap with Maduro

  • 2

    HK, Macau residency rules tightened

  • 3

    Mexican baseball’s growth starting to rival soccer clubs

  • 4

    KMT officials to be questioned for illegal assembly

  • 5

    New missile system to be used in US-Philippines Balikatan joint exercise