Cryptocurrency investors have been transfixed over the past few days by the antics of a mysterious hacker who stole more than US$600 million — before gradually giving it back.
Was the thief a good Samaritan who stole the money to expose a dangerous security flaw, or did they simply realize they were about to be caught?
The hacker on Tuesday struck Poly Network, a company that handles cryptocurrency transfers, in one of the biggest thefts of digital money in history.
Photo: AFP
However, by Thursday the perpetrator had given back almost all of the stolen funds in a slow trickle of transactions.
In messages embedded in the transfers, the thief said that the money had been stolen with good intentions.
“I am not very interested in money,” the hacker wrote, adding that it was “always the plan” to return the funds.
Despite their volatility and concerns over the huge waste of electricity they generate, cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and Ethereum have soared in popularity in the past few years.
Their combined market value stands at nearly US$2 trillion, creating alluring prospects for hackers. Most notoriously, thieves stole 850,000 bitcoins from Japanese exchange Mt. Gox in 2014. Worth about US$470 million at the time, the coins would today be worth a staggering US$38 billion.
Another Japanese exchange, Coincheck, was hacked for nearly US$500 million in 2018.
Yet in both cases, the technology that cryptocurrency uses allowed some of the funds to be traced — even though for Mt. Gox, it came too late to save the company.
Cryptocurrencies use blockchains, digital ledgers that record every transaction made.
Pawel Aleksander, an expert in tracking stolen cryptocurrency, said that thieves typically try to cover their tracks by splitting the money up and moving it around — “sometimes using hundreds of thousands of consecutive transactions.”
However, his company Coinfirm is among a growing number that specialize in following dizzyingly complicated blockchain transactions, helping law enforcement agencies and investors to trace stolen assets. While many crypto aficionados are hailing the Poly Network hacker as a principled hero, others suspect they began handing the money back because sleuths were on their trail.
The returns began after Xiamen SlowMist Technology Co Ltd (廈門慢霧科技有限公司), another investigative firm, said that it had identified some of the hacker’s personal details, including their e-mail address.
“It’s hard to say what the hacker’s initial intention was,” said Aleksander’s colleague, Roman Bieda.
“The hacker could be simply afraid of action taken against him,” he said, although he added that “white hat” ethical hackers do often seek to publicly shame companies for their security flaws.
In an encrypted exchange with the hacker dubbed “Mr White Hat,” Poly offered US$500,000 as a reward and promised: “We assure you that you will not be accountable for this incident.”
The hacker wrote that they had refused the bounty, saying: “I will send all of their money back.”
Crimes involving cryptocurrencies are on a downward trend, despite spectacular thefts such as this one and concerns about their use by criminal gangs.
A report this month by security firm CipherTrace Inc estimated global crypto crime losses at US$1.9 billion last year, down from US$4.5 billion in 2019.
Yet it did warn of an alarming rise in hacking and fraud linked to decentralized finance, or “defi” — a form of crypto-financing, including loans, designed to cut out intermediaries such as banks. The Poly Network heist is part of that trend, with the company calling it the biggest hack “in defi history.”
“The imagination of fraudsters in this industry is constantly developing,” said Syedur Rahman, a British lawyer who specializes in cases involving cryptocurrencies.
However, he added that tighter regulations are increasingly forcing cryptocurrency exchanges to verify users’ identities, while law enforcement agencies are growing more experienced in handling crypto crimes.
Hackers extracted a US$4.4 million ransom in bitcoin from oil company Colonial Pipeline in May, but the FBI was able to track down most of the coins and seize them.
However, retrieving stolen crypto assets can still be difficult.
“Criminal activities in crypto are very much multinational,” Aleksander said. “It’s typical that the victims sit in different jurisdictions, and the exchanges are registered in different jurisdictions.”
Victims’ battle to claw back money stolen in the Mt. Gox hack has been bogged down in years of international litigation, and hiring sleuths to trace stolen assets is an expensive option that is often out of reach for individual investors.
“When you have a consumer who has lost a nominal sum, there’s not much that can be done,” Rahman said.
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
Taiwan’s official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) last month rose 0.2 percentage points to 54.2, in a second consecutive month of expansion, thanks to front-loading demand intended to avoid potential US tariff hikes, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. While short-term demand appeared robust, uncertainties rose due to US President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policy, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) told a news conference in Taipei. Taiwan’s economy this year would be characterized by high-level fluctuations and the volatility would be wilder than most expect, Lien said Demand for electronics, particularly semiconductors, continues to benefit from US technology giants’ effort
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US
RSS