Cryptocurrency investors have been transfixed over the past few days by the antics of a mysterious hacker who stole more than US$600 million — before gradually giving it back.
Was the thief a good Samaritan who stole the money to expose a dangerous security flaw, or did they simply realize they were about to be caught?
The hacker on Tuesday struck Poly Network, a company that handles cryptocurrency transfers, in one of the biggest thefts of digital money in history.
Photo: AFP
However, by Thursday the perpetrator had given back almost all of the stolen funds in a slow trickle of transactions.
In messages embedded in the transfers, the thief said that the money had been stolen with good intentions.
“I am not very interested in money,” the hacker wrote, adding that it was “always the plan” to return the funds.
Despite their volatility and concerns over the huge waste of electricity they generate, cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and Ethereum have soared in popularity in the past few years.
Their combined market value stands at nearly US$2 trillion, creating alluring prospects for hackers. Most notoriously, thieves stole 850,000 bitcoins from Japanese exchange Mt. Gox in 2014. Worth about US$470 million at the time, the coins would today be worth a staggering US$38 billion.
Another Japanese exchange, Coincheck, was hacked for nearly US$500 million in 2018.
Yet in both cases, the technology that cryptocurrency uses allowed some of the funds to be traced — even though for Mt. Gox, it came too late to save the company.
Cryptocurrencies use blockchains, digital ledgers that record every transaction made.
Pawel Aleksander, an expert in tracking stolen cryptocurrency, said that thieves typically try to cover their tracks by splitting the money up and moving it around — “sometimes using hundreds of thousands of consecutive transactions.”
However, his company Coinfirm is among a growing number that specialize in following dizzyingly complicated blockchain transactions, helping law enforcement agencies and investors to trace stolen assets. While many crypto aficionados are hailing the Poly Network hacker as a principled hero, others suspect they began handing the money back because sleuths were on their trail.
The returns began after Xiamen SlowMist Technology Co Ltd (廈門慢霧科技有限公司), another investigative firm, said that it had identified some of the hacker’s personal details, including their e-mail address.
“It’s hard to say what the hacker’s initial intention was,” said Aleksander’s colleague, Roman Bieda.
“The hacker could be simply afraid of action taken against him,” he said, although he added that “white hat” ethical hackers do often seek to publicly shame companies for their security flaws.
In an encrypted exchange with the hacker dubbed “Mr White Hat,” Poly offered US$500,000 as a reward and promised: “We assure you that you will not be accountable for this incident.”
The hacker wrote that they had refused the bounty, saying: “I will send all of their money back.”
Crimes involving cryptocurrencies are on a downward trend, despite spectacular thefts such as this one and concerns about their use by criminal gangs.
A report this month by security firm CipherTrace Inc estimated global crypto crime losses at US$1.9 billion last year, down from US$4.5 billion in 2019.
Yet it did warn of an alarming rise in hacking and fraud linked to decentralized finance, or “defi” — a form of crypto-financing, including loans, designed to cut out intermediaries such as banks. The Poly Network heist is part of that trend, with the company calling it the biggest hack “in defi history.”
“The imagination of fraudsters in this industry is constantly developing,” said Syedur Rahman, a British lawyer who specializes in cases involving cryptocurrencies.
However, he added that tighter regulations are increasingly forcing cryptocurrency exchanges to verify users’ identities, while law enforcement agencies are growing more experienced in handling crypto crimes.
Hackers extracted a US$4.4 million ransom in bitcoin from oil company Colonial Pipeline in May, but the FBI was able to track down most of the coins and seize them.
However, retrieving stolen crypto assets can still be difficult.
“Criminal activities in crypto are very much multinational,” Aleksander said. “It’s typical that the victims sit in different jurisdictions, and the exchanges are registered in different jurisdictions.”
Victims’ battle to claw back money stolen in the Mt. Gox hack has been bogged down in years of international litigation, and hiring sleuths to trace stolen assets is an expensive option that is often out of reach for individual investors.
“When you have a consumer who has lost a nominal sum, there’s not much that can be done,” Rahman said.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process