Sun, May 16, 2021 page16

• Bitcoin won’t eclipse central banks

  • By Huw van Steenis / Bloomberg Opinion
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Innovation in central banking often starts in small markets. New Zealand was the first country to formally adopt inflation targeting as we now know it in 1990. Today, the Bahamas and Cambodia lead China in piloting central bank money in electronic form.

  However, few realize it was Finland that pioneered the world’s first central bank digital currency (CBDC). The experiment has some important lessons for those feverishly trying to figure out how revolutionary CBDCs will be, including the UK, which joined the club just last month with a new task force.

  Finland introduced the Avant Card in December 1992, long before bitcoin came into existence. It could be loaded with up to 500 euros (US$607) in today’s terms and was rechargeable.

  

  Mining rigs are pictured at the CryptoUniverse mining farm in Nadvoitsy, Russia, on March 18.

  Photo: Bloomberg

  According to Aleksi Grym, an economist at the Bank of Finland, central bankers were convinced that this system would quickly displace cash.

  However, consumers found it difficult to use. Retailers were frustrated to have to add extra point-of-sale equipment. Finland’s central bank ended up selling the card to a group of banks that shut it down in 2006.

  Today, Avant Cards can be found on eBay for US$10 — hardly digital gold.

  It turns out that displacing the efficiency and convenience of modern credit card networks, and now their digital brethren, is incredibly hard. Most consumers value the reassurance that their money is safe in the bank if they lose their debit or credit card, which was not true with these bearer instruments.

  It is revealing that today Finland has chosen the digital slow lane for reconsidering a CBDC, despite being the most cash-lite country in the world, with just 3 percent of transactions undertaken in cash.

  This leads to another key lesson: Before major central banks issue tokens at scale, there needs to be a far deeper assessment of the impact on financial stability and monetary policy, and whether they increase the potential for bank runs.

  This, not a technical judgment about the efficiency of rival payments systems, is what will determine how large central banks will act.

  After all, access to central bank money has traditionally been the preserve of domestic regulated banks. The age of the blockchain could open it up directly to other businesses, a huge taboo to break.

  What would that mean for the banking system, especially in a world where cash is far less important?

  Deposit flight in times of stress is far from a theoretical risk. The IMF totted up 124 systemic banking crises from 1970 to 2007. Even though post-crisis reforms make banks far stronger, liquidity scares would happen.

  To address this, pilot projects have limited the amount of funds available or gated the ability to move money, as with the Bahamas’ sand dollar.

  However, creating expensive new payment systems just for transactions of up to 3,000 euros, as the European Central Bank has suggested, is unlikely to be worthwhile.

  Central banks might even see their control over monetary policy transmission diluted, as Denis Beau, deputy governor of the Bank de France, has said.

  The financial crisis taught us that the models central banks relied upon were overly simplistic, fair-weather versions of what really could happen because they overlooked the complexity of how banks function. No central banker wants to repeat that mistake.

  This is not to say a digital dollar or euro is unviable, rather that central bankers will tread gingerly, starting with a narrower scope. This would leave the field open to bitcoin, other crypto assets and private sector stablecoins to make the running for years to come.

  However, in no way will central bankers simply sit this round out while others build some magical, new decentralized market without them.

  As former Bank of England governor Cameron Cobbold said: “A central bank is a bank, not a study group.”

  So the real action would be in making wholesale markets and cross-border transactions more efficient.

  An example is in Singapore, where JPMorgan Chase & Co and DBS Group Holdings Ltd (星展集團) are working with Temasek Holdings Pte to digitize commercial bank money on blockchain technology for international payments, building on a pilot program by the central bank.

  So perhaps the most interesting part of the UK’s announcement of a CDBC task force was not the tantalizing glimmer of a “Britcoin.” It was the Bank of England’s creation of a new “omnibus” account to provide access to its real-time settlement system beyond its traditional customers.

  This would allow new providers of financial market infrastructure to leverage blockchain technology to deliver faster and cheaper wholesale payments and settle them using central bank money.

  One consortium, comprised of 15 shareholders, including UBS Group AG, Barclays PLC and Nasdaq Inc, has already applied for access with a goal to be up and running next year. Others are likely to follow.

  Put another way, the UK might have the world’s first synthetic digital currency system for wholesale payments — backed by a central bank — as early as next year. Such a development, over time, would have a profound effect on the role of banks in settlement. This is what to watch, not the Bahamas’ sand dollar.

  Huw van Steenis is senior adviser to the CEO at UBS Group AG. He formerly served as senior adviser to former Bank of England governor Mark Carney.

  This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    US removes no independence statement

  • 2

    Taiwan thanks Japan for family registry change

  • 3

    MAC warns of PRC arrests, detentions

  • 4

    Taiwan blacklists two Chinese schools

  • 5

    Inter denied top spot in Serie A by rivals Juve