As in the US, initial public offering (IPO) activity in Asia has had its strongest start to a year, but the frenzy for new shares is likely to taper off as demand falls back in the next few months.
Asian companies, like their global peers, notched their best first quarter for listings ever, thanks to a flood of liquidity during the COVID-19 pandemic, low interest rates and rallying stock markets.
Asian firms raised US$49.3 billion through IPOs at home and abroad — a 154 percent jump over the same period last year, data compiled by Bloomberg showed.
Photo: Reuters
IPOs globally raised an unprecedented US$215 billion, with almost half of that haul coming from the record wave of issuances by special-purpose acquisition companies (SPAC) in the US.
Now, a global rotation out of highly valued technology and healthcare stocks that have dominated market activity, as well as fading excitement around SPACs in the US, is clouding the outlook for new deals.
“Inevitably, there is a mark to market of comparable valuations,” said William Smiley, cohead of equity capital markets at Goldman Sachs Group Inc in Asia ex-Japan. “In terms of our pipeline, there hasn’t been any significant impact from the recent rotation, but opportunistic issuance may have decelerated.”
Asia’s IPO space faces an added challenge — the travails of Chinese technology firms, which dominate fundraising in the region.
These companies are facing a crackdown against monopolistic practices at home and are also in focus as US-China tensions rise. For instance, the US last month moved forward with a law that could result in Chinese firms that do not comply with US auditing standards being removed from stock exchanges in the US.
The red flags are already there, with the investor mania seen earlier this year for deals like the one by Chinese TikTok rival Kuaishou Technology (快手) starting to die down.
Chinese fintech company Bairong Inc (百融雲創), which raised US$507 million, delivered the worst debut in three years among Hong Kong IPOs valued at more than US$500 million when the shares fell 16 percent on Wednesday last week.
US-listed Chinese search giant Baidu Inc (百度) and streaming service Bilibili Inc (嗶哩嗶哩) last month raised a combined US$5.7 billion through secondary listings in Hong Kong, but had lackluster debuts.
In contrast, investors were seen scrambling for a piece of Kuaishou’s US$6.2 billion Hong Kong IPO, the biggest listing globally so far this year, and South Korean e-commerce giant Coupang Inc’s US$4.6 billion float.
That said, muted investor appetite for listings is not affecting other hopeful companies.
Online music company Tencent Music Entertainment Group (騰訊音樂娛樂), microblogging service Sina Weibo Corp (微博) and online travel service Trip.com Group Ltd (攜程) are among US-traded Chinese companies seeking so-called “homecoming” listings in Hong Kong.
These secondary listings, seen as a hedge against China-US tensions, last year raised US$17 billion in Hong Kong and have amassed US$6.4 billion so far this year.
“The secondary listing trend will continue, but what should be interesting to see is whether new issuers who ultimately want to get to a dual listing, perhaps consider seeking a dual primary listing in Hong Kong and the US from the start, rather than doing a primary US listing, waiting two years and then coming to Hong Kong for the secondary listing,” said Francesco Lavatelli, head of equity capital markets for Asia-Pacific at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Technology and healthcare firms make up the bulk of the listing pipeline in Asia, bankers said, even without the “homecoming” cohort, many of whom opted for US listings because of the investor base’s greater familiarity with new economy stocks.
Among them is healthcare start-up WeDoctor (微醫), which is planning a multibillion Hong Kong IPO and Chinese start-up Full Truck Alliance Group (滿幫集團), which is looking into a US$1 billion US listing.
“The pipeline remains quite robust, but is centered around tech and growth stocks, which are obviously seeing a little bit of a re-rating,” said Tucker Highfield, cohead of equity capital markets for Asia-Pacific at Bank of America Corp. “The thesis of good companies being able to buck the trend of volatility will continue and there’s capital available.”
Ultimately, less frothy markets and a cooling of the IPO investor mania might actually be welcome.
“Entering a more balanced market environment isn’t a bad thing. It can extend the issuance cycle and work to keep excesses in check,” Smiley said. “If there is going to be correction, you want it to be fast — a prolonged downturn kills issuance.”
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process