A revolt by junior Goldman Sachs Group Inc bankers over work weeks that can stretch to as long as 105 hours has inspired schadenfreude over discontent at the storied investment bank and wider debate about the future of work after the COVID-19 pandemic.
The erosion between office and home boundaries during the pandemic means many white-collar workers can relate on some level to the complaints, even if the plight of elite young bankers seeking riches does not inspire sympathy.
The issues underlying the Goldman Sachs controversy are “reflective of a broader problem,” said Temple University sociologist Kevin Delaney, author of Money at Work: On the Job with Priests, Poker Players and Hedge Fund Traders.
Photo: Reuters
“People feel the boundaries have disappeared between work and leisure and work and life. A lot of people are struggling with it because they are not sure when they are allowed to take time off,” he said.
In the wake of the dustup, Goldman Sachs chief executive David Solomon has urged staff to respect a firm-wide policy of not working on Saturdays, and praised the young staffers for speaking up.
The gripes were felt beyond Goldman’s corner of Lower Manhattan. Citigroup Inc chief executive Jane Fraser last week announced “Zoom-Free Fridays” and urged workers to take their vacation time, adding that she planned a few days off “knowing I will come back with a fresher brain.”
Compared with other options, being overworked could be viewed as a preferable plight during the pandemic. Government data show millions of people in the US remain out of work.
COVID-19 itself has also infected or killed many “essential” workers such as supermarket staff, transit workers, nurses and others who cannot telecommute.
Among those still with jobs, mental burnout is on the rise.
In a Harvard Business Review article published last month, Jennifer Moss, a syndicated columnist who specializes in workplace issues, said the disruption has been especially pronounced for younger staff.
One worker quoted in the story said they encountered professional roadblocks as well as negative health effects from diminished opportunities to exercise.
A survey of 1,500 workers showed 85 percent reported that their well-being had declined, and 55 percent said they felt like they had not been able to balance their home and work life, Moss wrote.
Possible steps to remedy the situation include establishing a manageable workload and a mental health resource page for staff as part of a strategy to destigmatize the issue.
Solutions must go beyond self-care steps such as yoga and meditation apps, Moss said.
“We desperately need upstream interventions, not downstream tactics,” she said.
All of the young Goldman bankers felt their work hours had negatively affected relationships with friends and family and also created unrealistic deadlines.
Most also reported feeling as though they experienced workplace abuse and were shunned in meetings, according to an 11-page presentation complete with statistics and graphs, not unlike what the bank would prepare for a client.
“There was a point where I was not eating, showering or doing anything else other than working from morning until after midnight,” said one of the staff members surveyed.
A Goldman Sachs employee who has been with the firm for about three years said that the pandemic indeed made work more grueling, and that first-year employees can suffer especially from the lack of opportunities to interact with senior employees.
Work weeks of 95 hours or more were not a surprise, said the employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
Semiconductor shares in China surged yesterday after Reuters reported the US had ordered chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to halt shipments of advanced chips to Chinese customers, which investors believe could accelerate Beijing’s self-reliance efforts. TSMC yesterday started to suspend shipments of certain sophisticated chips to some Chinese clients after receiving a letter from the US Department of Commerce imposing export restrictions on those products, Reuters reported on Sunday, citing an unnamed source. The US imposed export restrictions on TSMC’s 7-nanometer or more advanced designs, Reuters reported. Investors figured that would encourage authorities to support China’s industry and bought shares
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said