Green energy investment is hot again in the US. To some, the new boom would raise the specter of the clean-tech bust that followed a streak of exuberance a decade ago.
However, there are reasons to believe that this time the trend is no bubble or mirage.
In the late 2000s and early 2010s, there was an explosion of investment in clean technology — renewable energy, plus other technologies to reduce carbon emissions.
Photo: Reuters
At first the money came largely from venture capitalists, but then the federal government stepped in and began providing cheap loans and subsidies. Then in 2011, solar manufacturer Solyndra spectacularly failed, causing an immense political backlash.
That was only the most prominent failure; overall, investors lost about US$25 billion when the sector crashed. Money dried up fast. For years, “clean tech” was a dirty word in venture capitalists’ conversations.
However, the worm turns, and clean tech is back.
A venture fund led by billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates — in which Michael Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg News, also invests — is committing billions of dollars. Funding for battery companies and electric-vehicle companies has skyrocketed, and investment in solar and wind energy dwarfs everything else.
This raises fear of another bubble for some — of history repeating itself. My colleague Liam Denning said that the rapid rise in valuations is a clear indicator of overpricing, which he expects to collapse when interest rates rise. Others see investors repeating the mistakes of a decade ago.
I am more optimistic. Although investors would certainly experience some ups and downs — already the Wilderhill Clean Energy Index has had a major correction since early last month — I am pretty confident that the clean-tech industry as a whole would not experience the kind of bust it did last time.
The most basic reason is that the fundamental underlying technology has matured in a way it simply had not a decade ago.
In 2009, the levelized cost of solar photovoltaic (PV) electricity was US$359 per megawatt-hour — more than four times as expensive as electricity from a natural gas plant.
By 2019, solar PV had fallen in price to US$40 per megawatt-hour, 28 percent cheaper than gas. That is an 89 percent decline in 10 years, with more cost drops yet to come. Meanwhile, lithium-ion batteries have experienced a similar drop in prices.
That order-of-magnitude drop in costs makes all the difference.
First of all, it means that solar and wind are not risky new technologies. Solyndra failed because it was trying to market an innovative new kind of solar cell, which ended up being too expensive when the tried-and-true design came down in cost. Future investments in solar would not have to bet on any difficult technological breakthroughs.
Batteries might be a different story — lots of money is being thrown at start-ups trying to create solid-state batteries, which would be a true breakthrough.
However, Tesla Inc is doing just fine with the old kind, so that sector is probably going to do okay as well. Venture investing does well when it does not have to bet on “hard tech” and much of clean tech is no longer hard.
Second, cost drops in clean energy mean that success does not depend on government intervention. In the earlier boom, fickle government subsidies were often necessary for capital-intensive energy companies to succeed.
Now, even though US President Joe Biden is planning a big push into clean-energy investment, the market is investing quite a lot in renewables all on its own.
Finally, investors have probably learned their lesson. Clean energy itself was never a good fit for venture. It is capital intensive, since buying solar panels and wind turbines entails a lot of money up front; venture capital tends to focus on cheap, small investments that scale. Instead of companies creating highly differentiated products and new markets, as in software, clean electricity companies are basically all trying to provide the same commodified product.
This time around, venture capitalists are letting bigger investors handle the build-out of solar and wind, and finding other niches where low-cost, differentiated start-ups can add value — such as solar services and financing, lab-grown meat and electric vehicles.
Some of those bets are certainly going to fail, but that is always the case in private equity. The success of Tesla — now with a market cap of almost US$700 billion, or 28 times the amount that was lost in the clean-tech bust — demonstrates the time-honored principle that a few big hits can compensate for a lot of little failures.
In other words, clean tech is entering the final stage of the famous Gartner Hype Cycle — a pattern that describes the progression of emerging technologies and business models, starting with an innovation that sees expectations climb and then crash, before they finally rise again to sustained productivity.
The clean-tech bust, like the dot-com bust in 2000, was a case of investor enthusiasm for a new technology outstripping the technology itself.
However, just as few today would question the value of companies like Google and Facebook Inc that came into their own during a trough in investor enthusiasm, eventually the value of clean technology would not be in question.
In Gartner’s terms, we have passed through the Trough of Disillusionment and are now climbing the Slope of Enlightenment.
Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University and he blogs at Noahpinion.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
A TAIWAN DEAL: TSMC is in early talks to fully operate Intel’s US semiconductor factories in a deal first raised by Trump officials, but Intel’s interest is uncertain Broadcom Inc has had informal talks with its advisers about making a bid for Intel Corp’s chip-design and marketing business, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter. Nothing has been submitted to Intel and Broadcom could decide not to pursue a deal, according to the Journal. Bloomberg News earlier reported that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is in early talks for a controlling stake in Intel’s factories at the request of officials at US President Donald Trump’s administration, as the president looks to boost US manufacturing and maintain the country’s leadership in critical technologies. Trump officials raised the
RSS