Green energy investment is hot again in the US. To some, the new boom would raise the specter of the clean-tech bust that followed a streak of exuberance a decade ago.
However, there are reasons to believe that this time the trend is no bubble or mirage.
In the late 2000s and early 2010s, there was an explosion of investment in clean technology — renewable energy, plus other technologies to reduce carbon emissions.
Photo: Reuters
At first the money came largely from venture capitalists, but then the federal government stepped in and began providing cheap loans and subsidies. Then in 2011, solar manufacturer Solyndra spectacularly failed, causing an immense political backlash.
That was only the most prominent failure; overall, investors lost about US$25 billion when the sector crashed. Money dried up fast. For years, “clean tech” was a dirty word in venture capitalists’ conversations.
However, the worm turns, and clean tech is back.
A venture fund led by billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates — in which Michael Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg News, also invests — is committing billions of dollars. Funding for battery companies and electric-vehicle companies has skyrocketed, and investment in solar and wind energy dwarfs everything else.
This raises fear of another bubble for some — of history repeating itself. My colleague Liam Denning said that the rapid rise in valuations is a clear indicator of overpricing, which he expects to collapse when interest rates rise. Others see investors repeating the mistakes of a decade ago.
I am more optimistic. Although investors would certainly experience some ups and downs — already the Wilderhill Clean Energy Index has had a major correction since early last month — I am pretty confident that the clean-tech industry as a whole would not experience the kind of bust it did last time.
The most basic reason is that the fundamental underlying technology has matured in a way it simply had not a decade ago.
In 2009, the levelized cost of solar photovoltaic (PV) electricity was US$359 per megawatt-hour — more than four times as expensive as electricity from a natural gas plant.
By 2019, solar PV had fallen in price to US$40 per megawatt-hour, 28 percent cheaper than gas. That is an 89 percent decline in 10 years, with more cost drops yet to come. Meanwhile, lithium-ion batteries have experienced a similar drop in prices.
That order-of-magnitude drop in costs makes all the difference.
First of all, it means that solar and wind are not risky new technologies. Solyndra failed because it was trying to market an innovative new kind of solar cell, which ended up being too expensive when the tried-and-true design came down in cost. Future investments in solar would not have to bet on any difficult technological breakthroughs.
Batteries might be a different story — lots of money is being thrown at start-ups trying to create solid-state batteries, which would be a true breakthrough.
However, Tesla Inc is doing just fine with the old kind, so that sector is probably going to do okay as well. Venture investing does well when it does not have to bet on “hard tech” and much of clean tech is no longer hard.
Second, cost drops in clean energy mean that success does not depend on government intervention. In the earlier boom, fickle government subsidies were often necessary for capital-intensive energy companies to succeed.
Now, even though US President Joe Biden is planning a big push into clean-energy investment, the market is investing quite a lot in renewables all on its own.
Finally, investors have probably learned their lesson. Clean energy itself was never a good fit for venture. It is capital intensive, since buying solar panels and wind turbines entails a lot of money up front; venture capital tends to focus on cheap, small investments that scale. Instead of companies creating highly differentiated products and new markets, as in software, clean electricity companies are basically all trying to provide the same commodified product.
This time around, venture capitalists are letting bigger investors handle the build-out of solar and wind, and finding other niches where low-cost, differentiated start-ups can add value — such as solar services and financing, lab-grown meat and electric vehicles.
Some of those bets are certainly going to fail, but that is always the case in private equity. The success of Tesla — now with a market cap of almost US$700 billion, or 28 times the amount that was lost in the clean-tech bust — demonstrates the time-honored principle that a few big hits can compensate for a lot of little failures.
In other words, clean tech is entering the final stage of the famous Gartner Hype Cycle — a pattern that describes the progression of emerging technologies and business models, starting with an innovation that sees expectations climb and then crash, before they finally rise again to sustained productivity.
The clean-tech bust, like the dot-com bust in 2000, was a case of investor enthusiasm for a new technology outstripping the technology itself.
However, just as few today would question the value of companies like Google and Facebook Inc that came into their own during a trough in investor enthusiasm, eventually the value of clean technology would not be in question.
In Gartner’s terms, we have passed through the Trough of Disillusionment and are now climbing the Slope of Enlightenment.
Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University and he blogs at Noahpinion.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Taiwan’s official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) last month rose 0.2 percentage points to 54.2, in a second consecutive month of expansion, thanks to front-loading demand intended to avoid potential US tariff hikes, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. While short-term demand appeared robust, uncertainties rose due to US President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policy, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) told a news conference in Taipei. Taiwan’s economy this year would be characterized by high-level fluctuations and the volatility would be wilder than most expect, Lien said Demand for electronics, particularly semiconductors, continues to benefit from US technology giants’ effort
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US