Fri, Mar 05, 2021 page12

• Ministry ready to talk over LNG site

  • By Angelica Oung / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday said it is ready to “sit down and exchange opinions” with environmentalists pushing a referendum to block the construction of a planned third liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal at the Guantang Industrial Park (觀塘工業區) in Taoyuan.

  The so-called “pink storm” referendum has garnered more than 430,000 signatures to stop the terminal and protect “algal reefs that are more than 7,500 years old” off Guanyin District’s (觀音) Datan Borough (大潭).

  “We are willing to communicate with environmentalists in any way possible,” Minister of Economic Affairs Wang Mei-hua (王美花) said.

  

  Algal reefs are pictured near Guantang Industrial Park in Taoyuan’s Guanyin District on Monday.

  Photo: Cheng Shu-ting, Taipei Times

  “If the referendum process goes forward, the Central Election Commission would hold hearings, which we would participate in, but we welcome exchanges of ideas whenever possible,” Wang said.

  “Let us sit down and talk,” she said.

  Environmental groups have accused the government of not considering “possible win-win alternatives” to the site for the planned project.

  They have dismissed Wang’s remarks that blocking the project would lead to more burning of coal, saying that it amounted to “threatening the people.”

  “In no way are we ‘threatening the people,’” Wang said. “Long-term planning is required to ensure electricity supply.”

  President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) energy transition plan calls for the proportion of natural gas used in electricity generation to be raised to 50 percent, said CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC, 台灣中油), which is responsible for the construction of the LNG terminal.

  “Currently we have two receiving terminals that are already running flat out,” CPC spokesman Chang Ray-chung (張瑞宗) said. “Without a third receiving terminal, there would be no way to supply the seventh, eighth and ninth generators at the Datan LNG plant.”

  Generators 8 and 9 would between them provide 6 percent of Taiwan’s total power output, Chang said.

  “If that 6 percent deficit is not filled, we would have to burn coal, which releases twice as much greenhouse gas and is also more polluting,” he said.

  The first storage tank at the planned terminal is scheduled to be finished in October next year, although the whole complex, which is to have two storage tanks, a wharf and a regasification system, is not slated to be completed until 2025, he said.

  When asked if alternatives to the site could be found, Chang said that a move would require a lengthy process of planning and assessment.

  “We went through years of environmental impact assessments for the current site,” he said. “All of that would have to be repeated.”

  “A site further from the power plant would require 30km to 50km of pipeline,” Chang said.

  “Moreover, no matter what site is chosen, there is no guarantee that there would not be objections,” he said.

  An assessment by CPC did not find a vibrant algal reef environment that environmentalists claim exists at the site, Chang said.

  “The planned terminal has been moved 740m offshore, where the water is more than 10m deep,” he said. “The seafloor is sand and is not a biodiverse site.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    LA Dodgers show off World Series rings

  • 2

    Homeless Sudan club defy odds in CAF Champions

  • 3

    Trump announces 32% tariffs on Taiwan

  • 4

    Michkov key as Flyers beat Predators

  • 5

    US hands over first long-awaited F-16