Why should only the wealthy get to ride unicorns to further riches?
Privately held firms with at least US$1 billion in value come with daunting price tags that freeze out ordinary investors. Banks that help unicorns raise money are glad to chalk up a few bulky subscriptions — US$1 million and more — from top clients. It works fine with regulators who do not want the general public to lose their life savings on risky bets.
Were the ticket, say, US$1,000, even affluent millennials might want to take a punt on the next Facebook Inc or Uber Technologies Inc without having to wait for a stock market debut.
Photo: AFP
That wait is only getting longer. A sizable chunk of US$2.5 trillion of uncalled private equity — dry powder — is with venture capital funds that promising companies can use to delay going public and spread the wealth more evenly.
The “status quo” is unfair. Until its recent initial public offering (IPO), the moneyed folk who would never deign to set foot in an Airbnb Inc property could buy in, whereas a younger, regular user could not. This gap in access could also be expensive.
The “massive downward pressure on wages” that the International Labour Organization has forecast for the near term — particularly for women — could make it harder for millennials to build nest eggs if interest rates remain low for long.
However, the existing setup lacks the technology to make private securities a mass-market product.
“Private banks only show deals to clients with net worth above US$50 million,” said Oi Yee Choo, chief commercial officer of Istox, a Singapore-based digital securities platform that aims to democratize finance by fractionalizing it.
It is not the first player to do so. San Francisco-based Forge Global Inc made available unlisted shares of Spotify Technology SA, Snap Inc and Square Inc to sovereign wealth funds, family offices and wealth managers.
The Peter Thiel-backed firm is now expanding in Asia. The timing is right.
Thanks to Airbnb and DoorDash Inc, venture-backed IPOs had a banner 2020, encouraging Asian unicorns to accelerate their own listing plans. The closer the offering, the greater the retail appetite.
Blockchain might offer a way to meet this demand. Istox, a start-up that counts Singapore’s stock exchange and state investment firm among its investors, is turning securities into tokens on distributed ledgers.
These are not public and permission-less like bitcoin. Istox tokens have no value in the outside world. Nevertheless, by using them, time-consuming manual processes can be automated via smart contracts — software code that self-executes when conditions are met. A three-day settlement cycle can be shortened to seconds. Bespoke investments can be resized as tiny parcels.
Istox, which is regulated by Singapore’s monetary authority, has given people access to the world’s first digitized unicorn fund for as little as US$20,000.
After securing US$50 million in Series A funding this week from a couple of Japanese government-backed investors and others, the goal is to create an exchange that would let individuals “participate in the growth of large pre-IPO companies like Grab and TransferWise, for example,” Choo said.
The technology can handle a ticket size as low as US$500.
Grab Holdings Ltd, which began as a ride-hailing service in Southeast Asia, is now a financial services player with a Singapore digital bank license.
UK-based TransferWise has found its niche in offering cheaper international money transfers than banks. If early backers or employees of unicorns can cash out when they want, the benefit of their US$1.4 trillion market value might reach more people.
Despite the lure of red-hot equities and the appeal of day-trading platforms like Robinhood Markets Inc, the 25-to-40 age group in the US has a slightly higher exposure to cash than older cohorts. The future of work and wages is under a cloud.
If millennials’ average US$83,000 retirement account balance does not get a return boost, they would lag behind wealthier older generations.
In Asia, too, inequality is worsening in ways that would matter for both states and markets, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (ANZ) has said.
Unemployment is soaring among Indonesia’s less-educated workers, South Korea’s part-time labor force is facing a job crunch, and India’s real wages have cratered.
To top it all, “the performance of financial assets is becoming a source of inequality,” ANZ analysts Sanjay Mathur and Dhiraj Nim said.
Before politicians reach for the hammer of taxation to tackle the inequality problem, they should use the mallet of technology.
Expectations must be realistic, though, about gains from this kind of investment democratization. Sustained 20 percent annual returns are increasingly something that only top private equity managers can boast.
In the US, the private equity industry’s 10-year performance advantage over public markets disappeared in 2019. The US-China cold war and Beijing’s scuttling of Ant Group Co’s (螞蟻集團) IPO — a reining in of “tech, trade and titans,” as Morgan Stanley puts it — might also weigh on future returns.
Singapore has not had much luck in competing with Hong Kong for hot IPOs.
However, by offering a pragmatic regulatory environment for enterprises that use blockchain — not necessarily for cryptocurrencies, but for eliminating inefficiencies in everything from remittances to trade finance and asset management — the financial center is acknowledging a simple reality: When it comes to making — or saving — money, millennials and generation Z will expect a fairer deal. They are the early adopters of tech unicorns’ products. Why should they be the last in line to get rich from businesses they have to explain to their mums and dads?
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services. He previously was a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He has also worked for the Straits Times, ET NOW and Bloomberg News.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process