From India to China to the US, automakers cannot make vehicles — not that no one wants any, but because a more than US$450 billion industry for semiconductors got blindsided. How did both sides end up here?
Over the past two weeks, automakers across the world have bemoaned the shortage of chips. Germany’s Audi, owned by Volkswagen AG, would delay making some of its high-end vehicles because of what chief executive officer Markus Duesmann called a “massive” shortfall in an interview with the Financial Times.
The firm has furloughed more than 10,000 workers and reined in production.
Photo: Reuters
That is a further blow to an industry reeling from COVID-19-induced shutdowns and a global market that had already been struggling under a growing regulatory push toward greener vehicles and the technology to keep up with the future of mobility.
Companies appear to have been off in their calculations that traditional auto production was all but coming to a halt, and that new-era vehicles were almost here.
In reality, talk of the death of the conventional auto industry has been premature. So were prospects around the technology upgrade that has been under way.
Yes, demand has been down and slowing, but we have been hovering around “peak auto” for a while, with global sales of 70 million to 80 million a year. They fell 15 percent to 66.8 million last year.
However, the expected onslaught of new-technology vehicles has not been as severe as the hype. Announcements of billions of dollars of investment covering electric to hydrogen and autonomous systems would have you believe that we have entered a new era of driving — or of being driven around. Yet electric and autonomous vehicles still account for only about 4 percent of all sales.
Misjudging expectations means that companies ended up effectively shelving too early their investment in the more mundane chips that help steer, brake and push up windows they actually need.
Meanwhile, chipmakers are not producing enough of them and have put money in higher-margin businesses. One result is that we are clearly at an imbalance of supply and demand.
Consider the number and types of semiconductor chips that go into a vehicle. Demand is not just about the number of automobiles, but how many chips each one needs. Electronic parts and components account for 40 percent of the cost of a new, internal-combustion engine vehicle, up from 18 percent in 2000.
That portion would continue to rise. It is becoming a problem across the board, and not just for higher-end models. India’s automakers’ association has complained of a shortage, and many vehicles there are relatively less sophisticated given pricing considerations.
So there was always going to be some sort of demand, whether you argued that more or fewer people would be driving.
Automotive electronics were expected to be the fastest-growing markets in the semiconductor industry, accounting for about 12 percent of sales revenue by next year, according to an April 2019 Deloitte report.
The 2022 model year is expected to be a key one. Credits that many automakers accumulated to meet greenhouse gas emission rules would expire at the end of the 2021 model year.
More compliant vehicles would be needed, and electrics and hybrids use twice the semiconductor content as traditional models, according to a PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP report.
On the supply side, the concern was more around keeping up with technology. In October 2019, the likes of Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc were contending with potential overproduction issues of certain types of chips. A year earlier, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, had sounded concerns about oversupply in 28-nanometer nodes — in demand for higher-end vehicle features at the time — as its other customers migrated to more advanced chipsets.
Part of the issue is that there is no fast substitute. Customers usually put orders in eight to 10 weeks ahead, but lead times have gotten much longer since the COVID-19 outbreak. Automakers in China, for instance, do not have more than a few weeks of supply on hand in keeping with lean, cost-friendly manufacturing operations.
There is also an equipment shortage, so foundries that make wafers typically suited for broad-based auto usage have limited capacity.
Chipmakers’ cycles — from development to certification — are long. Keeping track of and aligning with shifts in auto markets is difficult. The pandemic has not made that any easier. It seems that none of the players are quite in sync. The supply-demand balance is far too delicate. Even if consumer electronics are sucking up the chip supply, with everyone suddenly playing a lot more video games or increasing use of personal computers, manufacturers should not be disabled from making vehicles.
Everyone’s math ought to add up better than this.
Anjani Trivedi is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies in Asia. She previously worked for the Wall Street Journal.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
It is challenging to build infrastructure in much of Europe. Constrained budgets and polarized politics tend to undermine long-term projects, forcing officials to react to emergencies rather than plan for the future. Not in Austria. Today, the country is to officially open its Koralmbahn tunnel, the 5.9 billion euro (US$6.9 billion) centerpiece of a groundbreaking new railway that will eventually run from Poland’s Baltic coast to the Adriatic Sea, transforming travel within Austria and positioning the Alpine nation at the forefront of logistics in Europe. “It is Austria’s biggest socio-economic experiment in over a century,” said Eric Kirschner, an economist at Graz-based Joanneum
France is developing domestic production of electric vehicle (EV) batteries with an eye on industrial independence, but Asian experts are proving key in launching operations. In the Verkor factory outside the northern city of Dunkirk, which was inaugurated on Thursday, foreign specialists, notably from South Korea and Malaysia, are training the local staff. Verkor is the third battery gigafactory to open in northern France in a region that has become known as “Battery Valley.” At the Automotive Energy Supply Corp (AESC) factory near the city of Douai, where production has been under way for several months, Chinese engineers and technicians supervise French recruits. “They
RSS