From India to China to the US, automakers cannot make vehicles — not that no one wants any, but because a more than US$450 billion industry for semiconductors got blindsided. How did both sides end up here?
Over the past two weeks, automakers across the world have bemoaned the shortage of chips. Germany’s Audi, owned by Volkswagen AG, would delay making some of its high-end vehicles because of what chief executive officer Markus Duesmann called a “massive” shortfall in an interview with the Financial Times.
The firm has furloughed more than 10,000 workers and reined in production.
Photo: Reuters
That is a further blow to an industry reeling from COVID-19-induced shutdowns and a global market that had already been struggling under a growing regulatory push toward greener vehicles and the technology to keep up with the future of mobility.
Companies appear to have been off in their calculations that traditional auto production was all but coming to a halt, and that new-era vehicles were almost here.
In reality, talk of the death of the conventional auto industry has been premature. So were prospects around the technology upgrade that has been under way.
Yes, demand has been down and slowing, but we have been hovering around “peak auto” for a while, with global sales of 70 million to 80 million a year. They fell 15 percent to 66.8 million last year.
However, the expected onslaught of new-technology vehicles has not been as severe as the hype. Announcements of billions of dollars of investment covering electric to hydrogen and autonomous systems would have you believe that we have entered a new era of driving — or of being driven around. Yet electric and autonomous vehicles still account for only about 4 percent of all sales.
Misjudging expectations means that companies ended up effectively shelving too early their investment in the more mundane chips that help steer, brake and push up windows they actually need.
Meanwhile, chipmakers are not producing enough of them and have put money in higher-margin businesses. One result is that we are clearly at an imbalance of supply and demand.
Consider the number and types of semiconductor chips that go into a vehicle. Demand is not just about the number of automobiles, but how many chips each one needs. Electronic parts and components account for 40 percent of the cost of a new, internal-combustion engine vehicle, up from 18 percent in 2000.
That portion would continue to rise. It is becoming a problem across the board, and not just for higher-end models. India’s automakers’ association has complained of a shortage, and many vehicles there are relatively less sophisticated given pricing considerations.
So there was always going to be some sort of demand, whether you argued that more or fewer people would be driving.
Automotive electronics were expected to be the fastest-growing markets in the semiconductor industry, accounting for about 12 percent of sales revenue by next year, according to an April 2019 Deloitte report.
The 2022 model year is expected to be a key one. Credits that many automakers accumulated to meet greenhouse gas emission rules would expire at the end of the 2021 model year.
More compliant vehicles would be needed, and electrics and hybrids use twice the semiconductor content as traditional models, according to a PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP report.
On the supply side, the concern was more around keeping up with technology. In October 2019, the likes of Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc were contending with potential overproduction issues of certain types of chips. A year earlier, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, had sounded concerns about oversupply in 28-nanometer nodes — in demand for higher-end vehicle features at the time — as its other customers migrated to more advanced chipsets.
Part of the issue is that there is no fast substitute. Customers usually put orders in eight to 10 weeks ahead, but lead times have gotten much longer since the COVID-19 outbreak. Automakers in China, for instance, do not have more than a few weeks of supply on hand in keeping with lean, cost-friendly manufacturing operations.
There is also an equipment shortage, so foundries that make wafers typically suited for broad-based auto usage have limited capacity.
Chipmakers’ cycles — from development to certification — are long. Keeping track of and aligning with shifts in auto markets is difficult. The pandemic has not made that any easier. It seems that none of the players are quite in sync. The supply-demand balance is far too delicate. Even if consumer electronics are sucking up the chip supply, with everyone suddenly playing a lot more video games or increasing use of personal computers, manufacturers should not be disabled from making vehicles.
Everyone’s math ought to add up better than this.
Anjani Trivedi is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies in Asia. She previously worked for the Wall Street Journal.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
IN THE AIR: While most companies said they were committed to North American operations, some added that production and costs would depend on the outcome of a US trade probe Leading local contract electronics makers Wistron Corp (緯創), Quanta Computer Inc (廣達), Inventec Corp (英業達) and Compal Electronics Inc (仁寶) are to maintain their North American expansion plans, despite Washington’s 20 percent tariff on Taiwanese goods. Wistron said it has long maintained a presence in the US, while distributing production across Taiwan, North America, Southeast Asia and Europe. The company is in talks with customers to align capacity with their site preferences, a company official told the Taipei Times by telephone on Friday. The company is still in talks with clients over who would bear the tariff costs, with the outcome pending further
A proposed 100 percent tariff on chip imports announced by US President Donald Trump could shift more of Taiwan’s semiconductor production overseas, a Taiwan Institute of Economic Research (TIER) researcher said yesterday. Trump’s tariff policy will accelerate the global semiconductor industry’s pace to establish roots in the US, leading to higher supply chain costs and ultimately raising prices of consumer electronics and creating uncertainty for future market demand, Arisa Liu (劉佩真) at the institute’s Taiwan Industry Economics Database said in a telephone interview. Trump’s move signals his intention to "restore the glory of the US semiconductor industry," Liu noted, saying that
STILL UNCLEAR: Several aspects of the policy still need to be clarified, such as whether the exemptions would expand to related products, PwC Taiwan warned The TAIEX surged yesterday, led by gains in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), after US President Donald Trump announced a sweeping 100 percent tariff on imported semiconductors — while exempting companies operating or building plants in the US, which includes TSMC. The benchmark index jumped 556.41 points, or 2.37 percent, to close at 24,003.77, breaching the 24,000-point level and hitting its highest close this year, Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) data showed. TSMC rose NT$55, or 4.89 percent, to close at a record NT$1,180, as the company is already investing heavily in a multibillion-dollar plant in Arizona that led investors to assume
AI: Softbank’s stake increases in Nvidia and TSMC reflect Masayoshi Son’s effort to gain a foothold in key nodes of the AI value chain, from chip design to data infrastructure Softbank Group Corp is building up stakes in Nvidia Corp and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the latest reflection of founder Masayoshi Son’s focus on the tools and hardware underpinning artificial intelligence (AI). The Japanese technology investor raised its stake in Nvidia to about US$3 billion by the end of March, up from US$1 billion in the prior quarter, regulatory filings showed. It bought about US$330 million worth of TSMC shares and US$170 million in Oracle Corp, they showed. Softbank’s signature Vision Fund has also monetized almost US$2 billion of public and private assets in the first half of this year,