Norway’s oil and gas reserves have made it one of the world’s wealthiest countries, but its dreams for deep-sea discovery now center on something different.
This time, Oslo is looking for a leading role in mining copper, zinc and other metals found on the seabed and in hot demand in green technologies.
The country could license companies for deep-sea mining as early as 2023, the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy said, potentially placing it among the first countries to harvest seabed metals for electric vehicle batteries, wind turbines and solar farms.
However, that could also place it on the front line of a controversy over the environmental risks posed by exploiting the world’s unexplored seabeds.
Norway on Tuesday announced it was starting preparations for an environmental impact study needed to open areas of its seabed mineral exploration and production.
The move follows three years of expeditions on which Norway has found deep-sea deposits containing copper, zinc, cobalt, gold and silver, said the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, which conducted the work.
There could be up to 21.7 million tonnes of copper — more than the world’s copper output in 2019 — and 22.7 million tonnes of zinc on the Norwegian continental shelf, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) researchers have estimated.
However, mean estimates are far lower, at 6.9 million and 7.1 million tonnes, respectively.
“Copper mining inside Norway’s jurisdiction will probably never replace extraction onshore, but ... it can be an important contributor in meeting future global demand,” NTNU associate professor Steinar Loeve Ellefmo said.
“Deep-sea mining might also change the geopolitical climate,” he said.
The metals have been found in polymetallic sulphides, or “black smokers,” which are formed when sea water reaches magma, heats up and is flushed back to the seabed carrying dissolved metals and sulfur.
The expeditions have also discovered high concentrations of lithium and the rare earth metal scandium used in electronics, and alloys in manganese crusts that grow on bedrock, the directorate said.
Norway has mapped these deposits along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between Jan Mayen Island and the Svalbard archipelago in the Norwegian Sea as far as 700km offshore.
TIMELINE
Once completed, the government plans public consultations on its environmental impact assessment and on a proposal for opening areas for exploration and production by the end of next year, followed by debate and a vote in parliament in the second quarter of 2023.
“Were parliament to decide to open up, exploration licenses could be issued — possibly in the second half of 2023 or in 2024,” the oil and energy ministry said.
“We are moving forward on this, and the momentum is high,” Norwegian Minister of Petroleum and Energy Tina Bru said. “This is an industry with great potential.”
Japan has similar plans, but its project with private firms is not expected to begin before some time between 2026 and 2028, an official at the Japanese Agency for Natural Resources and Energy said.
Timing would depend on metals prices and reducing the costs of deep-sea mining, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The UN International Seabed Authority (ISA), which regulates seabed mineral activities in international waters, has approved 30 contracts for exploration with China holding the most with five.
The Jamaica-based ISA was forced to postpone plans to approve rules governing the production of deep-sea minerals to this year from last year due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, Norway does not have to wait as its resources are not in international waters.
ENVIRONMENT ISSUES
Although demand for the metals on offer is being driven by clean technologies, exploration of the seabed presents environmental challenges of its own.
Environmentalists including Britain’s David Attenborough have called for a moratorium on deep-seabed mining until more is known about species living on the seabed and the potential effect on them.
Greenpeace called for a permanent ban in a report.
“Greater knowledge of the environmental impacts, as well as the ability to mitigate these to acceptable levels, is required before we can be confident that engaging in industrial-scale deep-seabed mining would bring a global net benefit,” an expert report that was published last month and commissioned by the Ocean Panel said.
The Ocean Panel is cochaired by Norway and groups 14 coastal states that seek to shape policy on the world’s oceans.
“We are not saying a complete and final “no” to seabed mining, but we know that it can have very substantial impact on the seabed habitat, more than oil and gas extraction,” said Peter Haugan, a professor at the University of Bergen and one of the report’s coauthors.
Giant tube worms, clam shells, crabs and micro fauna all rely on the bacterial oxidation of chemicals in fluids in the hydrothermal vents where seabed minerals are found, according to the ISA.
Companies seeking exploration licenses say that they would focus their attention on inactive “smokers.”
“I believe Norway can do this in a sustainable way, but we have to do it step by step, which has been a key success factor for developing our oil and gas industry,” Bru said.
PIVOT FROM OIL
While oil and gas have made Norway rich, the country of 5.4 million is keen to find alternatives to gradually replace its top industry and to play its role in greener energy and the growth it offers.
Deep-sea mining could generate up to US$20 billion in annual revenue for Norway toward 2050 — compared with about US$61 billion from oil and gas in 2019 — and create about 20,000 jobs, Oslo-based consultancy Rystad Energy has estimated.
Seabird Exploration, which maps out the seabed for oil and gas deposits, plans to list a deep-sea mining subsidiary on the Euronext Growth Oslo small-cap bourse this quarter.
The Cyprus-based firm believes production could start by the late 2020s and could apply technologies used in the oil and gas sector.
“We will need to design from scratch the production system, but the basic elements are there ... it will be a mixture of mining and petroleum technology,” Seabird executive chairman Staale Rodahl said.
Nordic Mining also said that it would seek exploration licenses, while Norway’s largest energy firm Equinor and oil-focused investment group Aker have not yet decided whether to get involved, they said.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process